| Literature DB >> 26029196 |
Patricio Retamal1, Marcela Fresno2, Catherine Dougnac2, Sindy Gutierrez3, Vanessa Gornall3, Roberto Vidal4, Rolando Vernal5, Myriam Pujol2, Marlen Barreto6, Daniel González-Acuña7, Pedro Abalos8.
Abstract
Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis is a worldwide zoonotic agent that has been recognized as a very important food-borne bacterial pathogen, mainly associated with consumption of poultry products. The aim of this work was to determine genotypic and phenotypic evidence of S. Enteritidis transmission among seabirds, poultry and humans in Chile. Genotyping was performed using PCR-based virulotyping, pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST). Pathogenicity-associated phenotypes were determined with survival to free radicals, acidic pH, starvation, antimicrobial resistance, and survival within human dendritic cells. As result of PCR and PFGE assays, some isolates from the three hosts showed identical genotypic patterns, and through MLST it was determined that all of them belong to sequence type 11. Phenotypic assays show diversity of bacterial responses among isolates. When results were analyzed according to bacterial host, statistical differences were identified in starvation and dendritic cells survival assays. In addition, isolates from seabirds showed the highest rates of resistance to gentamycin, tetracycline, and ampicillin. Overall, the very close genetic and phenotypic traits shown by isolates from humans, poultry, and seabirds suggest the inter-species transmission of S. Enteritidis bacteria between hosts, likely through anthropogenic environmental contamination that determines infection of seabirds with bacteria that are potentially pathogenic for other susceptible organism, including humans.Entities:
Keywords: Chile; Enteritidis; Salmonella enterica; humans; poultry; seabirds
Year: 2015 PMID: 26029196 PMCID: PMC4432690 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00464
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
.
Virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance phenotypes appear with shaded squares.
.
.
Virulence gene combinations (Virulotypes) of .
| O | 10000100 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| K | 10010001 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| P | 10011000 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| G | 11000101 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| L | 11010001 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| B | 11010101 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| F | 11100001 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| H | 11100101 | 18 | 14 | 2 | 34 |
| N | 11101100 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| D | 11101101 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| M | 11101110 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| C | 11110001 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 20 |
| A | 11110101 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 18 |
| J | 11111000 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| I | 11111001 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| E | 11111101 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Letters were assigned correlatively according to the order in which isolates appear in the dendogram (Figure .
Frequency of virulence associated genes in .
| 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 90 (100) | |
| 30 (100) | 28 (93) | 27 (90) | 85 (94) | |
| 30 (100)a | 28 (93)a | 22 (73)b | 80 (89) | |
| 10 (33)a | 13 (43)a | 24 (80)b | 47 (52) | |
| 2 (7) | 4 (13) | 1 (3) | 7 (8) | |
| 24 (80) | 20 (67) | 18 (60) | 62 (69) | |
| 1 (3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | |
| 28 (93) | 28 (93) | 27 (90) | 83 (92) | |
Different letters represents statistical differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Dendogram showing genetic similarities (%) between . The ID and host are shown for each isolate. Clusters with at least five isolates sharing more than 95% similarity are indicated with letters A, B, C, and D. Mixed clusters are indicated with letters according to hosts (P, poultry; H, human; S, seabird). The tree was constructed using the UPGMA method with the software TREECON.
Average survival percentages (%) of .
| pH3 | 109.43 | 113.98 | 116.08 | 0.70 |
| H2O2 | 19.07 | 21.09 | 13.70 | 0.71 |
| NaNO2 | 24.29 | 27.30 | 19.80 | 0.85 |
| Starvation 10 d | 30.64a | 23.39a | 6.19b | 0.0004 |
| Starvation 20 d | 2.31a | 16.29a | 0.91b | 0.0005 |
| Starvation 30 d | 0.66a | 2.73b | 0.43a | 0.0022 |
| Starvation 40 d | 0.39a | 1.69b | 0.31a | 0.029 |
| DCs invasion | 1.4E-05 | 1.2E-05 | 4.2E-05 | 0.66 |
| DCs survival | 1.59a | 27.17c | 9.49b | 0.0036 |
Different letters represents statistical differences between groups.
pH3, H.
Figure 2Principal components analysis (PCA) showing the association between . In parenthesis appears the variability associated to each principal component (PC). S, seabirds; H, human; P, poultry; DC inv, invasion to dendritic cells; DC surv, survival within dendritic cells; pH3, survival to acidic pH; S, starvation assay (10–40 d, 10 to 40 days); 15 mM H2O2, survival to reactive oxygen species; 10 mM NaNO2, survival to reactive nitrogen species.
Figure 3Percentages (%) of antimicrobial resistant . AMC, Amoxicillin–clavulanic acid; AMP, Ampicillin; CTX, Cefotaxime; CFR, Cefadroxil; CE, Cefradine; EFT, Ceftiofur; ENR, Enrofloxacin; CN, Gentamicin; STX, Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazol; TE, Tetracycline.
Survival percentages (%) of .
| pH3 | 76.4a | 133.6b | 157.8b | 132.6b | 0.0002 |
| H2O2 | 18.8 | 12.1 | 11.5 | 26.3 | 0.1989 |
| NaNO2 | 33.9a | 20.5ab | 5.5b | 34.7a | 0.0094 |
| Starvation 10 d | 6.7a | 6.5a | 61.4b | 17.4a | <0.0001 |
| Starvation 20 d | 2.4 | 1.0 | 17.8 | 1.9 | 0.1436 |
| Starvation 30 d | 2.4 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.1462 |
| Starvation 40 d | 1.6 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.2012 |
Isolates constituting clusters appear in Figure .