Anshul Rai1, Surendra Agrawal2, Abhay Datarkar3. 1. Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, AIIMS, Bhopal, M.P India. 2. Department of Prosthodontics, Peoples Dental College, Bhopal, M.P India. 3. Datarkar Institute of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pratap Nagar, Nagpur, M.H India.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this technical note was to compare the primary stability and less bone drilling with the help of conventional and trephine drills. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 40 patients were divided into two groups (I & II) of 20 each and group I patients treated with conventional drills and group II with trephine drills. The patients who were reported to dental clinic and research centre between Jan 2011 to june 2011 and who required their teeth replacement with the help of dental implants were included in the study and patients with diabetes, Arthritis and smokers were excluded from the study. CONCLUSION: Trephine drills provide better primary stability and good long term results.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this technical note was to compare the primary stability and less bone drilling with the help of conventional and trephinedrills. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 40 patients were divided into two groups (I & II) of 20 each and group I patients treated with conventional drills and group II with trephinedrills. The patients who were reported to dental clinic and research centre between Jan 2011 to june 2011 and who required their teeth replacement with the help of dental implants were included in the study and patients with diabetes, Arthritis and smokers were excluded from the study. CONCLUSION:Trephinedrills provide better primary stability and good long term results.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone preservation; Primary stability; Trephine drills