Literature DB >> 26028545

COMT genotype, gambling activity, and cognition.

Jon E Grant1, Eric W Leppink2, Sarah A Redden2, Brian L Odlaug3, Samuel R Chamberlain4.   

Abstract

Neuropsychological studies of adults with problem gambling indicate impairments across multiple cognitive domains. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) plays a unique role in the regulation of dopamine in the prefrontal cortex, and has been implicated in the cognitive dysfunction evident in problem gambling. This study examined adults with varying levels of gambling behavior to determine whether COMT genotype was associated with differences in gambling symptoms and cognitive functioning. 260 non-treatment-seeking adults aged 18-29 years with varying degrees of gambling behavior provided saliva samples for genotyping COMT val158met (rs4680). All subjects underwent clinical evaluations and neurocognitive assessment of decision-making, working memory, and impulsivity. The Val/Val COMT genotype was associated with the largest percentage of subjects with gambling disorder (31.8%), a rate significantly different from the Val/Met (13.2%) group (p = 0.001). The Val/Val COMT group was also associated with significantly more gambling disorder diagnostic criteria being met, greater frequency of gambling behavior, and significantly worse cognitive performance on the Cambridge Gamble Task (risk adjustment and delay aversion) and the Spatial Working Memory task (total errors). This study adds to the growing literature on the role of COMT in impulsive behaviors by showing that the Val/Val genotype was associated with specific clinical and cognitive elements among young adults who gamble, in the absence of differences on demographic measures and other cognitive domains. Future work should consider using genotyping to explore whether certain polymorphisms predict subsequent development of impulsive behaviors including gambling disorder, and treatment outcomes.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COMT; Cognition; Dopamine; Gambling; Impulsivity; Planning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26028545     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  9 in total

Review 1.  Gambling disorder: an integrative review of animal and human studies.

Authors:  Katherine M Nautiyal; Mayumi Okuda; Rene Hen; Carlos Blanco
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Associations between self-harm and distinct types of impulsivity.

Authors:  Samuel R Chamberlain; Sarah A Redden; Jon E Grant
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  Problematic internet use in gamblers: impact on clinical and cognitive measures.

Authors:  Samuel R Chamberlain; Sarah A Redden; Eric Leppink; Jon E Grant
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.790

4.  Dopamine and Gambling Disorder: Prospects for Personalized Treatment.

Authors:  Andrew Kayser
Journal:  Curr Addict Rep       Date:  2019-03-07

5.  Depression Symptoms, Problem Gambling and the Role of Escape and Excitement Gambling Outcome Expectancies.

Authors:  Emma Vaughan; Mal Flack
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2021-05-03

6.  Gambling and family: A two-way relationship.

Authors:  Mythily Subramaniam; Siow Ann Chong; Pratika Satghare; Colette J Browning; Shane Thomas
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.756

7.  Dopamine and Risky Decision-Making in Gambling Disorder.

Authors:  Jan Peters; Taylor Vega; Dawn Weinstein; Jennifer Mitchell; Andrew Kayser
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-06-11

8.  Dopamine, time perception, and future time perspective.

Authors:  Jennifer M Mitchell; Dawn Weinstein; Taylor Vega; Andrew S Kayser
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Association of GDNF and CNTNAP2 gene variants with gambling.

Authors:  Arundhuti Das; Luca Pagliaroli; Andrea Vereczkei; Eszter Kotyuk; Banrida Langstieh; Zsolt Demetrovics; Csaba Barta
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 6.756

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.