Literature DB >> 26028454

[Guideline for the Development of Evidence-based Patient Information: insights into the methods and implementation of evidence-based health information].

Julia Lühnen1, Martina Albrecht2, Käthe Hanßen2, Julia Hildebrandt2, Anke Steckelberg2.   

Abstract

The "Guideline for the Development of Evidence-based Patient Information" project is a novelty. The aim of this project is to enhance the quality of health information. The development and implementation process is guided by national and international standards. Involvement of health information developers plays an essential role. This article provides an insight into the guideline's underlying methodology, using graphics as an example. In addition, the results of a qualitative study exploring the competencies of health information developers are presented. These results will guide the implementation of the guideline. We conducted systematic literature searches (until June 2014), critical appraisal and descriptive analyses applying GRADE for two selected guideline questions. Out of 3,287 hits 11 RCTs were included in the analysis. The evidence has been rated to be of low to moderate quality. Additional graphics may have a positive effect on cognitive outcomes. However, the relevance of the results is questionable. For graphics, we found some indication that especially pictograms but also bar graphs have a positive effect on cognitive outcomes and meet patients' preferences. In order to prepare for the implementation of the guideline, we conducted a qualitative study to explore the competencies of health information developers using expert interviews. Four telephone interviews were conducted, audio recorded, transcribed and analysed according to Grounded Theory. Six categories were identified: literature search, development of health information, participation of target groups, continuing education and further training of health information developers, cooperation with different institutions, essential competencies. Levels of competencies regarding the methods of evidence-based medicine and evidence-based health information vary considerably and indicate a need for training. These results have informed the development of a training programme that will support the implementation.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based health information; Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsinformation; Kompetenzen; Leitlinie; competencies; grafische Darstellungen; graphical representation; guideline

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26028454     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  8 in total

Review 1.  What should governments be doing to prevent diabetes throughout the life course?

Authors:  Patrick Timpel; Lorenz Harst; Doreen Reifegerste; Susann Weihrauch-Blüher; Peter E H Schwarz
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  The Development and Evaluation of an e-Learning Course That Promotes Digital Health Literacy in School-age Children: Pre-Post Measurement Study.

Authors:  Lars König; Eugenia Marbach-Breitrück; Anne Engler; Ralf Suhr
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 7.076

3.  A qualitative study of users' experiences after 3 months: the first Rwandan diabetes self-management Smartphone application "Kir'App".

Authors:  Claudine B Kabeza; Lorenz Harst; Peter E H Schwarz; Patrick Timpel
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.565

4.  Efficacy of a training programme to support the application of the guideline evidence-based health information: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Julia Lühnen; Birte Berger-Höger; Burkhard Haastert; Jana Hinneburg; Jürgen Kasper; Anke Steckelberg
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Helpful explanatory models for somatoform symptoms (HERMES): study protocol of a randomised mixed-methods pilot trial.

Authors:  Paul Hüsing; Bernd Löwe; Tim C Olde Hartman; Lisbeth Frostholm; Angelika Weigel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Fact boxes that inform individual decisions may contribute to a more positive evaluation of COVID-19 vaccinations at the population level.

Authors:  Felix G Rebitschek; Christin Ellermann; Mirjam A Jenny; Nico A Siegel; Christian Spinner; Gert G Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  A blended learning training programme for health information providers to enhance implementation of the Guideline Evidence-based Health Information: development and qualitative pilot study.

Authors:  Jana Hinneburg; Julia Lühnen; Anke Steckelberg; Birte Berger-Höger
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument.

Authors:  Jürgen Kasper; Julia Lühnen; Jana Hinneburg; Andrea Siebenhofer; Nicole Posch; Birte Berger-Höger; Alexander Grafe; Jan Keppler; A Steckelberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.