Literature DB >> 26028279

Risk of poor neonatal outcome at term after medically assisted reproduction: a propensity score-matched study.

Sabine Ensing1, Ameen Abu-Hanna2, Tessa J Roseboom3, Sjoerd Repping4, Fulco van der Veen4, Ben Willem J Mol5, Anita C J Ravelli2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study risk of birth asphyxia and related morbidity among term singletons born after medically assisted reproduction (MAR).
DESIGN: Population cohort study.
SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): A total of 1,953,932 term singleton pregnancies selected from a national registry for 1999-2011. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome Apgar score <4; secondary outcomes Apgar score <7, intrauterine fetal death, perinatal mortality, congenital anomalies, small for gestational age, asphyxia related morbidity, and cesarean delivery. RESULT(S): The risks of birth asphyxia and related morbidity were calculated in women who conceived either through MAR or spontaneously (SC), with a subgroup analysis for in vitro fertilization (IVF). An additional propensity score matching analysis was performed with matching on multiple maternal baseline covariates (maternal age, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, parity, year of birth, and preexistent diseases). Each MAR pregnancy was matched to three SC controls. Relative to SC, the MAR singletons had an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes including Apgar score <4 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.29; 95% CI, 1.14-1.46) and intrauterine fetal death (adjusted OR 1.61; 95% CI, 1.35-1.91). After propensity score matching, the risk of an Apgar score <4 was comparable between MAR and SC singletons (OR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.14). Cesarean delivery for both fetal distress and nonprogressive labor occurred more among MAR pregnancies compared with SC pregnancies. CONCLUSION(S): Term singletons conceived after MAR have an increased risk of morbidity related to birth asphyxia. Because this is mainly due to maternal characteristics, obstetric caregivers should be aware that the increased rates of cesareans reflect the behavior of women and physicians rather than increased perinatal complications.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth asphyxia; in vitro fertilization; medically assisted reproduction (MAR); poor neonatal outcome; propensity score matching

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26028279     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

Review 1.  Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment: a comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Roy Homburg; Susanna Santagni; Giovanni Battista La Sala; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.211

2.  Pregnant after assisted reproduction: a risk pregnancy is born! 18-years perinatal outcome results from a population-based registry in Flanders, Belgium.

Authors:  W Ombelet; G Martens; L Bruckers
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2016-12

3.  Patients with IVF complicated by moderate-to-critical OHSS experience increased thrombosis, GDM and neonatal NICU admission but slightly shorter gestation compared with matched IVF counterparts: A retrospective Chinese cohort study.

Authors:  Linli Hu; Rui Xie; Mengying Wang; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nakeisha A Lodge-Tulloch; Flavia T S Elias; Jessica Pudwell; Laura Gaudet; Mark Walker; Graeme N Smith; Maria P Velez
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Relationship between Maternal Serum Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone and in vitro Fertilisation-Conceived Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Ayla Coussa; Thomas M Barber; Zakwan Khrait; Samer Cheaib; Hayder A Hasan
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-06-01

6.  Is telephone follow-up reliable in maternal and neonatal outcomes surveys in in vitro fertilization?

Authors:  Ling Sun; Jian Xu; Pei-Ling Liang; Chun-Lin Liu
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 7.  Impact of contraception and IVF hormones on metabolic, endocrine, and inflammatory status.

Authors:  Ayla Coussa; Hayder A Hasan; Thomas M Barber
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.412

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.