Daniele S Feldman1, D Lisa Bollman2, Moshe Fridman3, Lisa M Korst4, Samia El Haj Ibrahim5, Arlene Fink6, Kimberly D Gregory7. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Burns and Allen Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: danielesfeldman@gmail.com. 2. Community Perinatal Network, Yorba Linda, CA. 3. AMF Consulting, Los Angeles, CA. 4. Childbirth Research Associates, North Hollywood, CA. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Burns and Allen Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. 6. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Health Services Research, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Langley Research Institute, Pacific Palisades, CA. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Burns and Allen Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the impact of the laborist staffing model on cesarean rates and maternal morbidity in California community hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study comparing cesarean rates, vaginal birth after cesarean rates, composite maternal morbidity, and severe maternal morbidity for laboring women in California community hospitals with and without laborists. We conducted interviews with nurse managers to obtain data regarding hospital policies, practices, and the presence of laborists, and linked this information with patient-level hospital discharge data for all deliveries in 2012. RESULTS: Of 248 childbirth hospitals, 239 (96.4%) participated; 182 community hospitals were studied, and these hospitals provided 221,247 deliveries for analysis. Hospitals with laborists (n = 43, 23.6%) were busier, had more clinical resources, and cared for higher-risk patients. There was no difference in the unadjusted primary cesarean rate for laborist vs nonlaborist hospitals (11.3% vs 11.7%; P = .382) but there was a higher maternal composite morbidity rate (14.4% vs 12.0%; P = .0006). After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, there were no differences in laborist vs nonlaborist hospitals for any of the specified outcomes. Hospitals with laborists had higher attempted trial of labor after cesarean rates, and lower repeat cesarean rates (90.9% vs 95.9%; P < .0001). However, among women attempting trial of labor after cesarean, there was no difference in the vaginal birth after cesarean success rate. CONCLUSION: We were unable to demonstrate differences in cesarean and maternal childbirth complication rates in community hospitals with and without laborists. Further efforts are needed to understand how the laborist staffing model contributes to neonatal outcomes, cost and efficiency of care, and patient and physician satisfaction.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the impact of the laborist staffing model on cesarean rates and maternal morbidity in California community hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study comparing cesarean rates, vaginal birth after cesarean rates, composite maternal morbidity, and severe maternal morbidity for laboring women in California community hospitals with and without laborists. We conducted interviews with nurse managers to obtain data regarding hospital policies, practices, and the presence of laborists, and linked this information with patient-level hospital discharge data for all deliveries in 2012. RESULTS: Of 248 childbirth hospitals, 239 (96.4%) participated; 182 community hospitals were studied, and these hospitals provided 221,247 deliveries for analysis. Hospitals with laborists (n = 43, 23.6%) were busier, had more clinical resources, and cared for higher-risk patients. There was no difference in the unadjusted primary cesarean rate for laborist vs nonlaborist hospitals (11.3% vs 11.7%; P = .382) but there was a higher maternal composite morbidity rate (14.4% vs 12.0%; P = .0006). After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, there were no differences in laborist vs nonlaborist hospitals for any of the specified outcomes. Hospitals with laborists had higher attempted trial of labor after cesarean rates, and lower repeat cesarean rates (90.9% vs 95.9%; P < .0001). However, among women attempting trial of labor after cesarean, there was no difference in the vaginal birth after cesarean success rate. CONCLUSION: We were unable to demonstrate differences in cesarean and maternal childbirth complication rates in community hospitals with and without laborists. Further efforts are needed to understand how the laborist staffing model contributes to neonatal outcomes, cost and efficiency of care, and patient and physician satisfaction.
Authors: Torri D Metz; Amanda A Allshouse; Sara A Babcock Gilbert; Reina Doyle; Angie Tong; J Christopher Carey Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Jonathan M Snowden; Katy Backes Kozhimannil; Ifeoma Muoto; Aaron B Caughey; K John McConnell Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Aireen Wingert; Cydney Johnson; Robin Featherstone; Meghan Sebastianski; Lisa Hartling; R Douglas Wilson Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 3.007