Mark W Creaby1, Melinda M Franettovich Smith2. 1. School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Australia. Electronic address: mark.creaby@acu.edu.au. 2. Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Reducing tibial acceleration through gait retraining is thought to reduce the risk of stress fracture development, however current approaches require the use of advanced accelerometry equipment not readily available in the clinical setting. The aim was to compare the effect of clinician guided feedback with accelerometry guided feedback on peak tibial accelerations during running. DESIGN: Repeated measures randomised design. METHODS:Twenty-two healthy male runners were randomised to receive either tibial accelerometry or clinician guided feedback. Peak tibial accelerations were obtained for all participants (i) prior to intervention, (ii) after 10min of feedback, (iii) after a further 10min without feedback, and (iv) 1 week later. RESULTS: Across groups, significant reductions in peak tibial acceleration were observed from baseline to each of the subsequent time points in the order of 19-29% (p=0.001). No between-group differences in peak tibial acceleration were observed at any of the follow-up time points (p=0.434). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that in the short term the low cost, low technology, clinician guided approach to retraining running gait may be equally as effective as the more expensive accelerometry guided solution in reducing peak tibial accelerations. Longer term follow-up is required to evaluate the efficacy of both approaches in reducing the risk of stress fracture development.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Reducing tibial acceleration through gait retraining is thought to reduce the risk of stress fracture development, however current approaches require the use of advanced accelerometry equipment not readily available in the clinical setting. The aim was to compare the effect of clinician guided feedback with accelerometry guided feedback on peak tibial accelerations during running. DESIGN: Repeated measures randomised design. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy male runners were randomised to receive either tibial accelerometry or clinician guided feedback. Peak tibial accelerations were obtained for all participants (i) prior to intervention, (ii) after 10min of feedback, (iii) after a further 10min without feedback, and (iv) 1 week later. RESULTS: Across groups, significant reductions in peak tibial acceleration were observed from baseline to each of the subsequent time points in the order of 19-29% (p=0.001). No between-group differences in peak tibial acceleration were observed at any of the follow-up time points (p=0.434). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that in the short term the low cost, low technology, clinician guided approach to retraining running gait may be equally as effective as the more expensive accelerometry guided solution in reducing peak tibial accelerations. Longer term follow-up is required to evaluate the efficacy of both approaches in reducing the risk of stress fracture development.
Authors: Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart Journal: Sports Med Date: 2022-10-15 Impact factor: 11.928
Authors: José Roberto de Souza Júnior; Pedro Henrique Reis Rabelo; Thiago Vilela Lemos; Jean-Francois Esculier; João Pedro da Silva Carto; João Paulo Chieregato Matheus Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pieter Van den Berghe; Valerio Lorenzoni; Rud Derie; Joren Six; Joeri Gerlo; Marc Leman; Dirk De Clercq Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 4.379