Literature DB >> 26026762

Chemical characterization of milk after treatment with thermal (HTST and UHT) and nonthermal (turbulent flow ultraviolet) processing technologies.

Jack C Cappozzo1, Tatiana Koutchma2, Gail Barnes3.   

Abstract

As a result of growing interest to nonthermal processing of milk, the purpose of this study was to characterize the chemical changes in raw milk composition after exposure to a new nonthermal turbulent flow UV process, conventional thermal pasteurization process (high-temperature, short-time; HTST), and their combinations, and compare those changes with commercially UHT-treated milk. Raw milk was exposed to UV light in turbulent flow at a flow rate of 4,000L/h and applied doses of 1,045 and 2,090 J/L, HTST pasteurization, and HTST in combination with UV (before or after the UV). Unprocessed raw milk, HTST-treated milk, and UHT-treated milk were the control to the milk processed with the continuous turbulent flow UV treatment. The chemical characterization included component analysis and fatty acid composition (with emphasis on conjugated linoleic acid) and analysis for vitamin D and A and volatile components. Lipid oxidation, which is an indicator to oxidative rancidity, was evaluated by free fatty acid analysis, and the volatile components (extracted organic fraction) by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to obtain mass spectral profile. These analyses were done over a 14-d period (initially after treatment and at 7 and 14 d) because of the extended shelf-life requirement for milk. The effect of UV light on proteins (i.e., casein or lactalbumin) was evaluated qualitatively by sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE. The milk or liquid soluble fraction was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE for changes in the protein profile. From this study, it appears that continuous turbulent flow UV processing, whether used as a single process or in combination with HTST did not cause any statistically significant chemical changes when compared with raw milk with regard to the proximate analysis (total fat, protein, moisture, or ash), the fatty acid profile, lipid oxidation with respect to volatile analysis, or protein profile. A 56% loss of vitamin D and a 95% loss of vitamin A content was noted after 7 d from the continuous turbulent flow UV processing, but this loss was equally comparable to that found with traditional thermal processing, such as HTST and UHT. Chemical characterization of milk showed that turbulent flow UV light technology can be considered as alternative nonthermal treatment of pasteurized milk and raw milk to extend shelf life.
Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  continuous turbulent flow UV; fatty acid composition; free fatty acid analysis; milk chemical characterization; vitamin analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26026762     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-9190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  4 in total

1.  Nicotinamide Riboside Is a Major NAD+ Precursor Vitamin in Cow Milk.

Authors:  Samuel Aj Trammell; Liping Yu; Philip Redpath; Marie E Migaud; Charles Brenner
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Potential Activity of Aqueous Fig Leaves Extract, Olive Leaves Extract and Their Mixture as Natural Preservatives to Extend the Shelf Life of Pasteurized Buffalo Milk.

Authors:  Mohamed El Dessouky Abdel-Aziz; Mohamed Samir Darwish; Azza H Mohamed; Ayman Y El-Khateeb; Sahar E Hamed
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-05-11

3.  A novel continuous hydrodynamic cavitation technology for the inactivation of pathogens in milk.

Authors:  Xun Sun; Xiaoxu Xuan; Li Ji; Songying Chen; Jingting Liu; Shan Zhao; Seulgi Park; Joon Yong Yoon; Ae Son Om
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 7.491

4.  Use of UV Treated Milk Powder to Increase Vaccine Efficacy in the Elderly.

Authors:  Sara Schaefer; Kasper Arthur Hettinga; James Cullor; J Bruce German; Bethany M Henrick
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 7.561

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.