Literature DB >> 26026485

IAEA randomised trial of optimal single dose radiotherapy in the treatment of painful bone metastases.

Peter Hoskin1, Ana Rojas2, Elena Fidarova3, Rakesh Jalali4, Ana Mena Merino5, Adela Poitevin6, Seam Oucrif7, Sherif Abdelwahab8, Lotfi Kochbati9, Aista Plieskiene10, Francesc Casas11, Susana Stojanovic12, Günther Schneider13, Branislav Jeremic3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine the optimal single-dose radiotherapy schedule for pain from bone metastases in a multi-centre, international, randomised trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 651 patients were randomised to either 8Gy (n=325) or 4Gy (n=326) radiotherapy. Pain at 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52weeks was assessed using a Categorical Scale (CS) and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The primary endpoint was response at 4weeks.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in patient demographics and other co-variates. The complete response (CR) rate and ORR (complete or partial response) for all follow-up times were higher after 8Gy (p=0.02). The Kaplan-Meier actuarial rate (categorical scale) at 4weeks for ORR was 80% after 8Gy compared to 68% after 4Gy (p=0.0015). 117 re-treatments were given of which 72 were in the 4Gy group and 45 in 8Gy arm (p=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: There was a marked consistent difference in pain relief at all time points in favour of 8Gy. These data reinforce the case for single dose 8Gy radiotherapy to be recommended for metastatic bone pain in all healthcare settings.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone metastases; Bone pain; Dose response; Palliative radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26026485     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  6 in total

1.  [Comparison of different fraction doses in single dose irradiation of painful bone metastases].

Authors:  Carsten Nieder
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design.

Authors:  Joanne M van der Velden; Helena M Verkooijen; Enrica Seravalli; Jochem Hes; A Sophie Gerlich; Nicolien Kasperts; Wietse S C Eppinga; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; Marco van Vulpen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Effectiveness and toxicity of conventional radiotherapy treatment for painful spinal metastases: a detailed course of side effects after opposing fields versus a single posterior field technique.

Authors:  Paulien G Westhoff; Alexander de Graeff; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Ilse de Pree; Marco van Vulpen; Jan Willem H Leer; Corrie A M Marijnen; Yvette M van der Linden
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-09-19

4.  Net Pain Relief After Palliative Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Useful Measure to Reflect Response Duration? A Further Analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study.

Authors:  Katie Spencer; Galina Velikova; Ann Henry; Paulien Westhoff; Pe Ter Hall; Yvette M van der Linden
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Use and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Trials of Palliative Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexander Fabian; Justus Domschikowski; Anne Letsch; Claudia Schmalz; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Juergen Dunst; David Krug
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01

6.  The influence of fractionated radiotherapy on the stability of spinal bone metastases: a retrospective analysis from 1047 cases.

Authors:  Tanja Sprave; Katharina Hees; Thomas Bruckner; Robert Foerster; Tilman Bostel; Ingmar Schlampp; Rami El Shafie; Nils Henrik Nicolay; Juergen Debus; Harald Rief
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.481

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.