Carolyn Ehrlich1, Elizabeth Kendall2, Sanjoti Parekh2, Caroline Walters2. 1. CONROD, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia c.ehrlich@griffith.edu.au. 2. CONROD, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The health of people from Indigenous and ethnic minorities is poorer than the remainder of the population. Frequently, Westernized health systems respond by introducing self-management interventions to improve chronic illness health outcomes. The aim of this study was to answer the research question: "Can self-management programs that have been adapted or modified still be effective for ethnic minority and Indigenous populations?" METHODS: A systematic review across four databases was conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-three publications met the inclusion criteria. As the studies were heterogeneous, meta-analysis was not possible. Overall, interventions resulted in more positive health outcomes than usual care, but findings were inconsistent. DISCUSSION: We argue that rather than focusing on individual skills, knowledge, self-efficacy, and attitudes toward self-management, it may be more important to explore the structures and processes that underpin the sharing of information and skills within clinical or education encounters. Given that self-management is a Western cultural construct, creating empathic and responsive systems might be more effective for improving health of Indigenous and ethnic minority groups rather than relying predominantly on individual skill development.
OBJECTIVES: The health of people from Indigenous and ethnic minorities is poorer than the remainder of the population. Frequently, Westernized health systems respond by introducing self-management interventions to improve chronic illness health outcomes. The aim of this study was to answer the research question: "Can self-management programs that have been adapted or modified still be effective for ethnic minority and Indigenous populations?" METHODS: A systematic review across four databases was conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-three publications met the inclusion criteria. As the studies were heterogeneous, meta-analysis was not possible. Overall, interventions resulted in more positive health outcomes than usual care, but findings were inconsistent. DISCUSSION: We argue that rather than focusing on individual skills, knowledge, self-efficacy, and attitudes toward self-management, it may be more important to explore the structures and processes that underpin the sharing of information and skills within clinical or education encounters. Given that self-management is a Western cultural construct, creating empathic and responsive systems might be more effective for improving health of Indigenous and ethnic minority groups rather than relying predominantly on individual skill development.
Authors: Jane Lloyd; Louise Dougherty; Sarah Dennis; Heather Attenbrow; Elizabeth Harris; Marilyn Wise; Mark Harris Journal: Health Lit Res Pract Date: 2019-10-10