Literature DB >> 26025767

Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ - The LORD study.

Lotte E Elshof1, Konstantinos Tryfonidis2, Leen Slaets3, A Elise van Leeuwen-Stok4, Victoria P Skinner5, Nicolas Dif6, Ruud M Pijnappel7, Nina Bijker8, Emiel J Th Rutgers9, Jelle Wesseling10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current debate on overdiagnosis and overtreatment of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) urges the need for prospective studies to address this issue. A substantial number of DCIS lesions will never form a health hazard, particularly if it concerns non- to slow-growing low-grade DCIS. The LORD study aims to evaluate the safety of active surveillance in women with low-risk DCIS.
DESIGN: This is a randomised, international multicentre, open-label, phase III non-inferiority trial, led by the Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG 2014-04) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC-BCG 1401). Standard treatment will be compared to active surveillance in 1240 women aged ⩾ 45 years with asymptomatic, screen-detected, pure low-grade DCIS based on vacuum-assisted biopsies of microcalcifications only. Both study arms will be monitored with annual digital mammography for a period of 10 years. The primary end-point is 10-year ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free percentage. Secondary end-points include patient reported outcomes, diagnostic biopsy rate during follow-up, ipsilateral mastectomy rate and translational research. FEASIBILITY: To explore interest in and feasibility of the LORD study we conducted a survey among EORTC and BOOG centres. A vast majority of EORTC and BOOG responding centres expressed interest in participation in the LORD study. The proposed study design is endorsed by nearly all centres.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Hormonal therapy; Low-grade; Overdiagnosis; Overtreatment; Radiotherapy; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26025767     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  81 in total

1.  Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.

Authors:  Geunwon Kim; Peter G Mikhael; Tawakalitu O Oseni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Mathematical Models for Tumor Growth and the Reduction of Overtreatment.

Authors:  Berdine L Heesterman; John-Melle Bokhorst; Lisa M H de Pont; Berit M Verbist; Jean-Pierre Bayley; Andel G L van der Mey; Eleonora P M Corssmit; Frederik J Hes; Peter Paul G van Benthem; Jeroen C Jansen
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-07-23

3.  Preparing for the renaissance: treating breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic and planning for a safe re-emergence to routine surgical care within a universal health care system.

Authors:  D Berger-Richardson; G Ko; N J Look Hong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast: Present Approaches and Future Directions.

Authors:  Lawrence J Solin
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Paradigm Shifts in Breast Care Delivery: Impact of Imaging in a Multidisciplinary Environment.

Authors:  Savitri Krishnamurthy; Therese Bevers; Henry M Kuerer; Benjamin Smith; Wei Tse Yang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Controversies in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

Authors:  Andrea V Barrio; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 7.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of breast: update 2019.

Authors:  Sunil S Badve; Yesim Gökmen-Polar
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.306

8.  Modeling Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): An Overview of CISNET Model Approaches.

Authors:  Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Jeroen J van den Broek; Xiaoxue Li; Harald Weedon-Fekjær; Clyde B Schechter; Oguzhan Alagoz; Xuelin Huang; Donald L Weaver; Elizabeth S Burnside; Rinaa S Punglia; Harry J de Koning; Sandra J Lee
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Are we overtreating intraductal papillomas?

Authors:  Sayee Kiran; Young Ju Jeong; Maria E Nelson; Alexander Ring; Meade B Johnson; Pulin A Sheth; Yanling Ma; Stephen F Sener; Julie E Lang
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Can dedicated breast PET help to reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment by differentiating between indolent and potentially aggressive ductal carcinoma in situ?

Authors:  Lucía Graña-López; Michel Herranz; Inés Domínguez-Prado; Sonia Argibay; Ángeles Villares; Manuel Vázquez-Caruncho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.