Literature DB >> 26025216

Cluster-randomized clinical trial examining the impact of platelet function testing on practice: the treatment with adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors: longitudinal assessment of treatment patterns and events after acute coronary syndrome prospective open label antiplatelet therapy study.

Tracy Y Wang1, Timothy D Henry2, Mark B Effron2, Emily Honeycutt2, Connie N Hess2, Marjorie E Zettler2, David J Cohen2, Brian A Baker2, Peter B Berger2, Kevin J Anstrom2, Dominick J Angiolillo2, Eric D Peterson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how clinicians use platelet function testing to guide choice and dosing of adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor (ADPri) therapy in routine community practice. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The Treatment With Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events After Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)-Prospective, Open Label, Antiplatelet Therapy Study (TRANSLATE-POPS) was a cluster-randomized trial in which 100 hospitals were assigned access to no-cost platelet function testing versus usual care for acute myocardial infarction patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. In both arms, ADPri treatment decisions were left up to the care team. The primary end point was the frequency of ADPri therapy adjustment before discharge. Secondary end points included 30-day rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries-defined bleeding events. Platelet function testing was performed in 66.9% of patients treated in intervention sites versus 1.4% of patients in usual care sites. Intervention arm patients were more likely to have ADPri therapy adjustment than usual care patients (14.8% versus 10.5%, P=0.004; odds ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.18-2.40); however, there were no significant differences in 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (4.8% versus 5.4%, P=0.73; odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.66-1.34) or bleeding (4.3% versus 4.2%, P=0.33; odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.55-1.34). One-year outcomes were also not significantly different between groups. An as-treated analysis showed higher incidence of ADPri therapy adjustment among intervention arm patients who received platelet function testing than untested usual care arm (16.4% versus 10.2%, P<0.0001), but no significant differences in major adverse cardiovascular events or bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: TRANSLATE-POPS found that when clinicians routinely used platelet function testing, they were more likely to adjust their choice or dosing of ADPri therapy; yet with few changes in therapy overall, significant differences in clinical outcomes were not seen. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01088503.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  percutaneous coronary intervention; physicians’ treatment choice; platelet function testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26025216     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  5 in total

Review 1.  Antiplatelet Therapy in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Interv Cardiol Clin       Date:  2016-02-13

2.  Adequate Platelet Function Inhibition Confirmed by Two Inductive Agents Predicts Lower Recurrence of Ischemic Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack.

Authors:  Lulu Zhang; Xiaowei Hu; Juehua Zhu; Xiuying Cai; Yan Kong; Hui Wang; Shanshan Diao; Hongru Zhao; Jianhua Jiang; Dapeng Wang; Quanquan Zhang; Yiren Qin; Wei Yue; Qi Fang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Antiplatelet Therapy Changes for Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Recurrent Ischemic Events: Insights Into Contemporary Practice From the TRANSLATE-ACS (Treatment With ADP Receptor Inhibitors: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events After Acute Coronary Syndrome) Study.

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Eric D Peterson; Mohammed W Akhter; Mark B Effron; Timothy D Henry; Tracy Y Wang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Contractile forces in platelet aggregates under microfluidic shear gradients reflect platelet inhibition and bleeding risk.

Authors:  Lucas H Ting; Shirin Feghhi; Nikita Taparia; Annie O Smith; Ari Karchin; Esther Lim; Alex St John; Xu Wang; Tessa Rue; Nathan J White; Nathan J Sniadecki
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease: Current status and future directions.

Authors:  Gabriella Passacquale; Pankaj Sharma; Divaka Perera; Albert Ferro
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.716

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.