Literature DB >> 26025074

Comparative assessment of different reconstructive techniques of distal femur in revision total knee arthroplasty.

A Completo1, F Fonseca2, A Ramos3, J Simões3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bone loss is often encountered in revision total knee arthroplasty. In particular, when the cortex of distal femur is breached, the surgical decision on the reconstructive options to be taken is challenging due to the variety of defects and the lack of data from clinical or experimental studies that can support it. The aim of the present work was to test the hypothesis that for an identical defect and bone condition, each reconstructive technique option has a dissimilar stress and stability behaviour, which may be related to differing longevity of the revision procedure.
METHODS: Triaxial strain gauges and video extensometer were used to measure distal cortex strains and implant stability in eight reconstructive techniques replicated with synthetic femur under a load of 2030N. To assess the cancellous bone strains, finite element models were developed and validated.
RESULTS: The measured strains showed that the distal cortex is not immune to the different reconstructive techniques, when applied to an identical defect; however, significant differences (P < 0.05) were found only between bone graft and metal augment on the 12-mm larger distal defect. The stem addition improves the stability of all reconstructive techniques; however, significant differences (P = 0.03) were found only on the bone-graft technique.
CONCLUSIONS: Cement-fill and metal-augment techniques, applied to the 4-mm smaller defect, are not associated with different structural behaviour, while for the 12-mm larger defect, the metal-augment and bone-graft techniques presented distinct biomechanical effects. These effects, by themselves, may not be sufficient to be associated with a different longevity of the revision procedure among techniques, when the stem is added to the bone-graft technique. These findings, based on independent scientific understanding and advanced prediction tools, can improve the surgical decision-making process, when the peripheral cortex of the distal femur is breached.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experimental strains; Modular augments; Press-fit stem; Revision total knee arthroplasty; Structural allograft

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26025074     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3652-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  34 in total

1.  Failure of the stem-condyle junction of a modular femoral stem in revision total knee arthroplasty: a report of five cases.

Authors:  L A Lim; R T Trousdale; D J Berry; A D Hanssen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Bone allografts: What they can offer and what they cannot.

Authors:  C Delloye; O Cornu; V Druez; O Barbier
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-05

Review 3.  The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement.

Authors:  J P Whittaker; R Dharmarajan; A D Toms
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-08

4.  Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with bone allograft in 30 cases.

Authors:  Katrina F Franke; Iulian Nusem; Gaugin Gamboa; David A F Morgan
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.500

5.  Improved stability with intramedullary stem after anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Completo; F Fonseca; C Relvas; A Ramos; J A Simões
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: clinical outcome comparison with and without the use of femoral head structural allograft.

Authors:  Corey J Richards; Donald S Garbuz; Luke Pugh; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The Rotaglide mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no difference between cemented and hybrid implantation.

Authors:  Michael Iosifidis; Efthymios Iliopoulos; Dimos Neofytou; Nikolaos Sakorafas; Dimitrios Andreou; Dimitrios Alvanos; Anastasios Kyriakidis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking.

Authors:  J B Morrison
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chiu; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Repairing minor bone defects: augmentation & autograft.

Authors:  D A Dennis
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  1 in total

1.  Femoral revision knee Arthroplasty with Metaphyseal sleeves: the use of a stem is not mandatory of a structural point of view.

Authors:  F Fonseca; A Sousa; A Completo
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2020-04-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.