Literature DB >> 26024346

Air contaminants associated with potential respiratory effects from unconventional resource development activities.

Michael McCawley1.   

Abstract

Unconventional natural gas development uses horizontal drilling in conjunction with hydraulic fracturing to gain access to natural gas deposits which may be tightly held in shale deposits and unavailable to conventional vertical drilling operations. The intensive work required to extract this source of energy results in higher than usual numbers of vehicles involved, potential release of emissions from those vehicles in congested zones surrounding the drill site, and release of other contaminants from materials drawn back out of the borehole after fracturing of the shale. Typical contaminants would be diesel exhaust particulate and gases, volatile organic compounds and other hydrocarbons both from diesels and the drilling process, crystalline silica, used as part of the hydraulic fracturing process in kiloton quantities, and methane escaping from the borehole and piping. A rise in respiratory disease with proximity to the process has been reported in nearby communities and both silica and diesel exposures at the worksite are recognized respiratory hazards. Because of the relatively short time this process has been used to the extent it is currently being used, it is not possible to draw detailed conclusions about the respiratory hazards that may be posed. However, based on the traffic volume associated with each drill site and the number of drill sites in any locale, it is possible at least to compare the effects to that of large traffic volume highways which are known to produce some respiratory effects in surrounding areas. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26024346     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1549453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1069-3424            Impact factor:   3.119


  6 in total

Review 1.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Natural gas development, flaring practices and paediatric asthma hospitalizations in Texas.

Authors:  Mary Willis; Perry Hystad; Alina Denham; Elaine Hill
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Unconventional oil and gas development and risk of childhood leukemia: Assessing the evidence.

Authors:  Elise G Elliott; Pauline Trinh; Xiaomei Ma; Brian P Leaderer; Mary H Ward; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 4.  Adequacy of Current State Setbacks for Directional High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing in the Marcellus, Barnett, and Niobrara Shale Plays.

Authors:  Marsha Haley; Michael McCawley; Anne C Epstein; Bob Arrington; Elizabeth Ferrell Bjerke
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Health-based evaluation of ambient air measurements of PM2.5 and volatile organic compounds near a Marcellus Shale unconventional natural gas well pad site and a school campus.

Authors:  Christopher M Long; Nicole L Briggs; Brian A Cochran; Destiny M Mims
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  Use of Tracer Elements for Estimating Community Exposure to Marcellus Shale Development Operations.

Authors:  Maya Nye; Travis Knuckles; Beizhan Yan; James Ross; William Orem; Matthew Varonka; George Thurston; Alexandria Dzomba; Michael McCawley
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.