Literature DB >> 26024280

Nitrogen removal and greenhouse gas emissions from constructed wetlands receiving tile drainage water.

Tyler A Groh, Lowell E Gentry, Mark B David.   

Abstract

Loss of nitrate from agricultural lands to surface waters is an important issue, especially in areas that are extensively tile drained. To reduce these losses, a wide range of in-field and edge-of-field practices have been proposed, including constructed wetlands. We re-evaluated constructed wetlands established in 1994 that were previously studied for their effectiveness in removing nitrate from tile drainage water. Along with this re-evaluation, we measured the production and flux of greenhouse gases (GHGs) (CO, NO, and CH). The tile inlets and outlets of two wetlands were monitored for flow and N during the 2012 and 2013 water years. In addition, seepage rates of water and nitrate under the berm and through the riparian buffer strip were measured. Greenhouse gas emissions from the wetlands were measured using floating chambers (inundated fluxes) or static chambers (terrestrial fluxes). During this 2-yr study, the wetlands removed 56% of the total inlet nitrate load, likely through denitrification in the wetland. Some additional removal of nitrate occurred in seepage water by the riparian buffer strip along each berm (6.1% of the total inlet load, for a total nitrate removal of 62%). The dominant GHG emitted from the wetlands was CO, which represented 75 and 96% of the total GHG emissions during the two water years. The flux of NO contributed between 3.7 and 13% of the total cumulative GHG flux. Emissions of NO were 3.2 and 1.3% of the total nitrate removed from wetlands A and B, respectively. These wetlands continue to remove nitrate at rates similar to those measured after construction, with relatively little GHG gas loss.
Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26024280     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2014.10.0415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Contaminant Transport in Agricultural Drainage Water and Urban Stormwater Runoff.

Authors:  Ehsan Ghane; Andry Z Ranaivoson; Gary W Feyereisen; Carl J Rosen; John F Moncrief
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Efficiency of mitigation measures targeting nutrient losses from agricultural drainage systems: A review.

Authors:  Mette Vodder Carstensen; Fatemeh Hashemi; Carl Christian Hoffmann; Dominik Zak; Joachim Audet; Brian Kronvang
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Effects of modelling studies on controlled drainage in agricultural land on reduction of outflow and nitrate losses-a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Kęsicka; Rafał Stasik; Michał Kozłowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Soil N2O and CH4 emissions from fodder maize production with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation.

Authors:  Jerry C Dlamini; L M Cardenas; E H Tesfamariam; R M Dunn; J Evans; J M B Hawkins; M S A Blackwell; A L Collins
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.993

5.  Nitrogen Removal from Domestic Wastewater and the Development of Tropical Ornamental Plants in Partially Saturated Mesocosm-Scale Constructed Wetlands.

Authors:  Carlos Nakase; Florentina Zurita; Graciela Nani; Guillermo Reyes; Gregorio Fernández-Lambert; Arturo Cabrera-Hernández; Luis Sandoval
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.