Fatema F Ghasia1, Aasef G Shaikh2, Jonathan Jacobs3, Mark F Walker4. 1. Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States 2Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States 3Daroff-DelOsso Ocular Motility Laboratory, Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cle. 2. Daroff-DelOsso Ocular Motility Laboratory, Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States 4Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States. 3. Daroff-DelOsso Ocular Motility Laboratory, Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States. 4. Daroff-DelOsso Ocular Motility Laboratory, Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States 5Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Pattern strabismus describes vertically incomitant horizontal strabismus. Conventional theories emphasized the role of orbital etiologies, such as abnormal fundus torsion and misaligned orbital pulleys as a cause of the pattern strabismus. Experiments in animal models, however, suggested the role of abnormal cross-connections between the neural circuits. We quantitatively assessed eye movements in patients with pattern strabismus with a goal to delineate the role of neural circuits versus orbital etiologies. METHODS: We measured saccadic eye movements with high-precision video-oculography in 14 subjects with pattern strabismus, 5 with comitant strabismus, and 15 healthy controls. We assessed change in eye position in the direction orthogonal to that of the desired eye movement (cross-coupled responses). We used fundus photography to quantify the fundus torsion. RESULTS: We found cross-coupling of saccades in all patients with pattern strabismus. The cross-coupled responses were in the same direction in both eyes, but larger in the nonviewing eye. All patients had clinically apparent inferior oblique overaction with abnormal excylotorsion. There was no correlation between the amount of the fundus torsion or the grade of oblique overaction and the severity of cross-coupling. The disconjugacy in the saccade direction and amplitude in pattern strabismics did not have characteristics predicted by clinically apparent inferior oblique overaction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results validated primate models of pattern strabismus in human patients. We found no correlation between ocular torsion or oblique overaction and cross-coupling. Therefore, we could not ascribe cross-coupling exclusively to the orbital etiology. Patients with pattern strabismus could have abnormalities in the saccade generators.
PURPOSE: Pattern strabismus describes vertically incomitant horizontal strabismus. Conventional theories emphasized the role of orbital etiologies, such as abnormal fundus torsion and misaligned orbital pulleys as a cause of the pattern strabismus. Experiments in animal models, however, suggested the role of abnormal cross-connections between the neural circuits. We quantitatively assessed eye movements in patients with pattern strabismus with a goal to delineate the role of neural circuits versus orbital etiologies. METHODS: We measured saccadic eye movements with high-precision video-oculography in 14 subjects with pattern strabismus, 5 with comitant strabismus, and 15 healthy controls. We assessed change in eye position in the direction orthogonal to that of the desired eye movement (cross-coupled responses). We used fundus photography to quantify the fundus torsion. RESULTS: We found cross-coupling of saccades in all patients with pattern strabismus. The cross-coupled responses were in the same direction in both eyes, but larger in the nonviewing eye. All patients had clinically apparent inferior oblique overaction with abnormal excylotorsion. There was no correlation between the amount of the fundus torsion or the grade of oblique overaction and the severity of cross-coupling. The disconjugacy in the saccade direction and amplitude in pattern strabismics did not have characteristics predicted by clinically apparent inferior oblique overaction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results validated primate models of pattern strabismus in humanpatients. We found no correlation between ocular torsion or oblique overaction and cross-coupling. Therefore, we could not ascribe cross-coupling exclusively to the orbital etiology. Patients with pattern strabismus could have abnormalities in the saccade generators.
Authors: Sei Yeul Oh; Robert A Clark; Federico Velez; Arthur L Rosenbaum; Joseph L Demer Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Gabriella Ugolini; François Klam; Maria Doldan Dans; David Dubayle; Anne-Marie Brandi; Jean Büttner-Ennever; Werner Graf Journal: J Comp Neurol Date: 2006-10-20 Impact factor: 3.215
Authors: Mark M G Walton; Adam Pallus; Jérome Fleuriet; Michael J Mustari; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Timour Al-Khindi; Michael B Sherman; Takashi Kodama; Preethi Gopal; Zhiwei Pan; James K Kiraly; Hao Zhang; Loyal A Goff; Sascha du Lac; Alex L Kolodkin Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2022-08-22 Impact factor: 10.900
Authors: Talora L Martin; Jordan Murray; Kiran Garg; Charles Gallagher; Aasef G Shaikh; Fatema F Ghasia Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 4.379