Leonardo Rangel-Castilla1, Robert F Spetzler1. 1. Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
Abstract
OBJECT: The ideal surgical approach to thalamic cavernous malformations (CMs) varies according to their location within the thalamus. To standardize surgical approaches, the authors have divided the thalamus into 6 different regions and matched them with the corresponding surgical approach. METHODS: The regions were defined as Region 1 (anteroinferior), Region 2 (medial), Region 3 (lateral), Region 4 (posterosuperior), Region 5 (lateral posteroinferior), and Region 6 (medial posteroinferior). The senior author's surgical experience with 46 thalamic CMs was reviewed according to this classification. An orbitozygomatic approach was used for Region 1; anterior ipsilateral transcallosal for Region 2; anterior contralateral transcallosal for Region 3; posterior transcallosal for Region 4; parietooccipital transventricularfor Region 5; and supracerebellar-infratentorial for Region 6. RESULTS: Region 3 was the most common location (17 [37%]). There were 5 CMs in Region 1 (11%), 9 in Region 2 (20%), 17 in Region 3 (37%), 3 in Region 4 (6%), 4 in Region 5 (9%), and 8 in Region 6 (17%). Complete resection was achieved in all patients except for 2, who required a second-stage operation. The mean follow-up period was 1.7 years (range 6 months-9 years). At the last clinical follow-up, 40 patients (87%) had an excellent or good outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 0-2) and 6 (13%) had poor outcome (mRS scores 3-4). Relative to their preoperative condition, 42 patients (91%) were unchanged or improved, and 4 (9%) were worse. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have presented the largest series reported to date of surgically treated thalamic CMs, achieving excellent results using this methodology. In the authors' experience, conceptually dividing the thalamus into 6 different regions aids in the selection of the ideal surgical approach fora specific region.
OBJECT: The ideal surgical approach to thalamic cavernous malformations (CMs) varies according to their location within the thalamus. To standardize surgical approaches, the authors have divided the thalamus into 6 different regions and matched them with the corresponding surgical approach. METHODS: The regions were defined as Region 1 (anteroinferior), Region 2 (medial), Region 3 (lateral), Region 4 (posterosuperior), Region 5 (lateral posteroinferior), and Region 6 (medial posteroinferior). The senior author's surgical experience with 46 thalamic CMs was reviewed according to this classification. An orbitozygomatic approach was used for Region 1; anterior ipsilateral transcallosal for Region 2; anterior contralateral transcallosal for Region 3; posterior transcallosal for Region 4; parietooccipital transventricularfor Region 5; and supracerebellar-infratentorial for Region 6. RESULTS: Region 3 was the most common location (17 [37%]). There were 5 CMs in Region 1 (11%), 9 in Region 2 (20%), 17 in Region 3 (37%), 3 in Region 4 (6%), 4 in Region 5 (9%), and 8 in Region 6 (17%). Complete resection was achieved in all patients except for 2, who required a second-stage operation. The mean follow-up period was 1.7 years (range 6 months-9 years). At the last clinical follow-up, 40 patients (87%) had an excellent or good outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 0-2) and 6 (13%) had poor outcome (mRS scores 3-4). Relative to their preoperative condition, 42 patients (91%) were unchanged or improved, and 4 (9%) were worse. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have presented the largest series reported to date of surgically treated thalamic CMs, achieving excellent results using this methodology. In the authors' experience, conceptually dividing the thalamus into 6 different regions aids in the selection of the ideal surgical approach fora specific region.
Authors: Aderaldo Costa Alves; Marco Antônio Zanini; Pedro Tadao Hamamoto Filho; Feres Eduardo Aparecido Chaddad-Neto Journal: Front Surg Date: 2022-06-10
Authors: Vladimír Beneš; Michal Zápotocký; Petr Libý; Jakub Táborský; Jana Blažková; Jana Blažková; David Sumerauer; Adéla Mišove; Ivana Perníková; Martin Kynčl; Lenka Krsková; Miroslav Koblížek; Josef Zámečník; Ondřej Bradáč; Michal Tichý Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Jaejoon Lim; YoungJoon Park; Ju Won Ahn; So Jung Hwang; Hyouksang Kwon; Kyoung Su Sung; Kyunggi Cho Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240