Literature DB >> 26023955

Losses of Ammonia and Nitrate from Agriculture and Their Effect on Nitrogen Recovery in the European Union and the United States between 1900 and 2050.

Hans J M van Grinsven, Lex Bouwman, Kenneth G Cassman, Harold M van Es, Michelle L McCrackin, Arthur H W Beusen.   

Abstract

Historical trends and levels of nitrogen (N) budgets and emissions to air and water in the European Union and the United States are markedly different. Agro-environmental policy approaches also differ, with emphasis on voluntary or incentive-based schemes in the United States versus a more regulatory approach in the European Union. This paper explores the implications of these differences for attaining long-term policy targets for air and water quality. Nutrient surplus problems were more severe in the European Union than in the United States during the 1970s and 1980s. The EU Nitrates and National Emission Ceilings directives contributed to decreases in fertilizer use, N surplus, and ammonia (NH) emissions, whereas in the United States they stabilized, although NH emissions are still increasing. These differences were analyzed using statistical data for 1900-2005 and the global IMAGE model. IMAGE could reproduce NH emissions and soil N surpluses at different scales (European Union and United States, country and state) and N loads in the Rhine and Mississippi. The regulation-driven changes during the past 25 yr in the European Union have reduced public concerns and have brought agricultural N loads to the aquatic environment closer to US levels. Despite differences in agro-environmental policies and agricultural structure (more N-fixing soybean and more spatially separated feed and livestock production in the United States than in the European Union), current N use efficiency in US and EU crop production is similar. IMAGE projections for the IAASTD-baseline scenario indicate that N loading to the environment in 2050 will be similar to current levels. In the United States, environmental N loads will remain substantially smaller than in the European Union, whereas agricultural production in 2050 in the United States will increase by 30% relative to 2005, as compared with an increase of 8% in the European Union. However, in the United States, even rigorous mitigation with maximum recycling of manure N and a 25% reduction in fertilizer use will not achieve the policy target to halve the N export to the Gulf of Mexico.
Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26023955     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2014.03.0102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  8 in total

Review 1.  Nanotechnology and artificial intelligence to enable sustainable and precision agriculture.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Zhiling Guo; Sami Ullah; Georgia Melagraki; Antreas Afantitis; Iseult Lynch
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 15.793

2.  From planetary to regional boundaries for agricultural nitrogen pollution.

Authors:  L F Schulte-Uebbing; A H W Beusen; A F Bouwman; W de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 69.504

3.  Nitrogen and the future of agriculture: 20 years on : This article belongs to Ambio's 50th Anniversary Collection. Theme: Solutions-oriented research.

Authors:  Kenneth G Cassman; Achim Dobermann
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Opinion: A "more ammonium solution" to mitigate nitrogen pollution and boost crop yields.

Authors:  G V Subbarao; Timothy D Searchinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter.

Authors:  Juliane Hirte; Jens Leifeld; Samuel Abiven; Hans-Rudolf Oberholzer; Andreas Hammelehle; Jochen Mayer
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Atmospheric nitrogen deposition in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: A history of change.

Authors:  Douglas A Burns; Gopal Bhatt; Lewis C Linker; Jesse O Bash; Paul D Capel; Gary W Shenk
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Where Have All the Nutrients Gone? Long-Term Decoupling of Inputs and Outputs in the Willamette River Watershed, Oregon, United States.

Authors:  Genevieve S Metson; Jiajia Lin; John A Harrison; Jana E Compton
Journal:  J Geophys Res Biogeosci       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Global nitrogen budgets in cereals: A 50-year assessment for maize, rice, and wheat production systems.

Authors:  J K Ladha; A Tirol-Padre; C K Reddy; K G Cassman; Sudhir Verma; D S Powlson; C van Kessel; Daniel de B Richter; Debashis Chakraborty; Himanshu Pathak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.