UNLABELLED: Plyometrics is a popular training modality for basketball players to improve power and change-of-direction speed. Most plyometric training has used sagittal-plane exercises, but improvements in change-of-direction speed have been greater in multi-direction programs. PURPOSE: To determine the benefits of a 6-wk frontal-plane plyometric (FPP) training program compared with a 6-wk sagittal-plane plyometric (SPP) training program with regard to power and change-of-direction speed. METHODS:Fourteen female varsity high school basketball players participated in the study. Multiple 2 × 2 repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to determine differences for the FPP and SPP groups from preintervention to postintervention on 4 tests of power and 2 tests of change-of-direction speed. RESULTS: There was a group main effect for time in all 6 tests. There was a significant group × time interaction effect in 3 of the 6 tests. The SPP improved performance of the countermovement vertical jump more than the FPP, whereas the FPP improved performance of the lateral hop (left) and lateral-shuffle test (left) more than the SPP. The standing long jump, lateral hop (right), and lateral-shuffle test (right) did not show a significant interaction effect. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that basketball players should incorporate plyometric training in all planes to improve power and change-of-direction speed.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: Plyometrics is a popular training modality for basketball players to improve power and change-of-direction speed. Most plyometric training has used sagittal-plane exercises, but improvements in change-of-direction speed have been greater in multi-direction programs. PURPOSE: To determine the benefits of a 6-wk frontal-plane plyometric (FPP) training program compared with a 6-wk sagittal-plane plyometric (SPP) training program with regard to power and change-of-direction speed. METHODS: Fourteen female varsity high school basketball players participated in the study. Multiple 2 × 2 repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to determine differences for the FPP and SPP groups from preintervention to postintervention on 4 tests of power and 2 tests of change-of-direction speed. RESULTS: There was a group main effect for time in all 6 tests. There was a significant group × time interaction effect in 3 of the 6 tests. The SPP improved performance of the countermovement vertical jump more than the FPP, whereas the FPP improved performance of the lateral hop (left) and lateral-shuffle test (left) more than the SPP. The standing long jump, lateral hop (right), and lateral-shuffle test (right) did not show a significant interaction effect. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that basketball players should incorporate plyometric training in all planes to improve power and change-of-direction speed.
Authors: Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Cristian Álvarez; Antonio García-Hermoso; Robinson Ramírez-Vélez; Paulo Gentil; Abbas Asadi; Helmi Chaabene; Jason Moran; Cesar Meylan; Antonio García-de-Alcaraz; Javier Sanchez-Sanchez; Fabio Y Nakamura; Urs Granacher; William Kraemer; Mikel Izquierdo Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: David G Behm; James D Young; Joseph H D Whitten; Jonathan C Reid; Patrick J Quigley; Jonathan Low; Yimeng Li; Camila D Lima; Daniel D Hodgson; Anis Chaouachi; Olaf Prieske; Urs Granacher Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Marta Domínguez-Díez; Daniel Castillo; Javier Raya-González; Silvia Sánchez-Díaz; María Soto-Célix; Tara Rendo-Urteaga; Ángel Lago-Rodríguez Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Luca Petrigna; Bettina Karsten; Giuseppe Marcolin; Antonio Paoli; Giuseppe D'Antona; Antonio Palma; Antonino Bianco Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 4.566