Bram Trachet1, Rodrigo A Fraga-Silva2, Francisco J Londono3, Abigaïl Swillens3, Nikolaos Stergiopulos2, Patrick Segers3. 1. IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University-IMinds Medical IT, Ghent, Belgium; Institute of Bioengineering, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. 2. Institute of Bioengineering, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. 3. IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University-IMinds Medical IT, Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Several ultrasound-based methods are currently used to assess aortic diameter, circumferential strain and stiffness in mice, but none of them is flawless and a gold standard is lacking. We aimed to assess the validity and sensitivity of these methods in control animals and animals developing dissecting abdominal aortic aneurysm. METHODS AND RESULTS: We first compared systolic and diastolic diameters as well as local circumferential strains obtained in 47 Angiotensin II-infused ApoE(-/-) mice with three different techniques (BMode, short axis MMode, long axis MMode), at two different abdominal aortic locations (supraceliac and paravisceral), and at three different time points of abdominal aneurysm formation (baseline, 14 days and 28 days). We found that short axis BMode was preferred to assess diameters, but should be avoided for strains. Short axis MMode gave good results for diameters but high standard deviations for strains. Long axis MMode should be avoided for diameters, and was comparable to short axis MMode for strains. We then compared pulse wave velocity measurements using global, ultrasound-based transit time or regional, pressure-based transit time in 10 control and 20 angiotensin II-infused, anti-TGF-Beta injected C57BL/6 mice. Both transit-time methods poorly correlated and were not able to detect a significant difference in PWV between controls and aneurysms. However, a combination of invasive pressure and MMode diameter, based on radio-frequency data, detected a highly significant difference in local aortic stiffness between controls and aneurysms, with low standard deviation. CONCLUSIONS: In small animal ultrasound the short axis view is preferred over the long axis view to measure aortic diameters, local methods are preferred over transit-time methods to measure aortic stiffness, invasive pressure-diameter data are preferred over non-invasive strains to measure local aortic stiffness, and the use of radiofrequency data improves the accuracy of diameter, strain as well as stiffness measurements.
OBJECTIVE: Several ultrasound-based methods are currently used to assess aortic diameter, circumferential strain and stiffness in mice, but none of them is flawless and a gold standard is lacking. We aimed to assess the validity and sensitivity of these methods in control animals and animals developing dissecting abdominal aortic aneurysm. METHODS AND RESULTS: We first compared systolic and diastolic diameters as well as local circumferential strains obtained in 47 Angiotensin II-infused ApoE(-/-) mice with three different techniques (BMode, short axis MMode, long axis MMode), at two different abdominal aortic locations (supraceliac and paravisceral), and at three different time points of abdominal aneurysm formation (baseline, 14 days and 28 days). We found that short axis BMode was preferred to assess diameters, but should be avoided for strains. Short axis MMode gave good results for diameters but high standard deviations for strains. Long axis MMode should be avoided for diameters, and was comparable to short axis MMode for strains. We then compared pulse wave velocity measurements using global, ultrasound-based transit time or regional, pressure-based transit time in 10 control and 20 angiotensin II-infused, anti-TGF-Beta injected C57BL/6 mice. Both transit-time methods poorly correlated and were not able to detect a significant difference in PWV between controls and aneurysms. However, a combination of invasive pressure and MMode diameter, based on radio-frequency data, detected a highly significant difference in local aortic stiffness between controls and aneurysms, with low standard deviation. CONCLUSIONS: In small animal ultrasound the short axis view is preferred over the long axis view to measure aortic diameters, local methods are preferred over transit-time methods to measure aortic stiffness, invasive pressure-diameter data are preferred over non-invasive strains to measure local aortic stiffness, and the use of radiofrequency data improves the accuracy of diameter, strain as well as stiffness measurements.
Authors: Kana Fujikura; Jianwen Luo; Viktor Gamarnik; Mathieu Pernot; Royd Fukumoto; Martin David Tilson; Elisa E Konofagou Journal: Ultrason Imaging Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 1.578
Authors: Christophe Casteleyn; Bram Trachet; Denis Van Loo; Daniel G H Devos; Wim Van den Broeck; Paul Simoens; Pieter Cornillie Journal: J Anat Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 2.610
Authors: Arthur J A Leloup; Paul Fransen; Cor E Van Hove; Marc Demolder; Gilles W De Keulenaer; Dorien M Schrijvers Journal: Hypertension Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Craig J Hartley; Anilkumar K Reddy; Sridhar Madala; Mark L Entman; Lloyd H Michael; George E Taffet Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Dan Gavrila; Wei Gen Li; Michael L McCormick; Manesh Thomas; Alan Daugherty; Lisa A Cassis; Francis J Miller; Larry W Oberley; Kevin C Dellsperger; Neal L Weintraub Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2005-06-02 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Brian S Knipp; Gorav Ailawadi; Vita V Sullivan; Karen J Roelofs; Peter K Henke; James C Stanley; Gilbert R Upchurch Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: M Rouer; B H Xu; H J Xuan; H Tanaka; N Fujimura; K J Glover; Y Furusho; M Gerritsen; R L Dalman Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Hisashi Sawada; Jeff Z Chen; Bradley C Wright; Jessica J Moorleghen; Hong S Lu; Alan Daugherty Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Justyna Janus; Baris Kanber; Wadhah Mahbuba; Charlotte Beynon; Kumar V Ramnarine; David G Lambert; Nilesh J Samani; Emma J Stringer; Michael E Kelly Journal: Ultrasound Date: 2018-08-07
Authors: Arvin H Soepriatna; Frederick W Damen; Pavlos P Vlachos; Craig J Goergen Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 2.357