Changiz Gholipour1, Fakher Rahim2, Abolghasem Fakhree3, Behrad Ziapour4. 1. Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences , Tabriz, Iran . 2. PhD in molecular, Hearing Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Science , Ahvaz, Iran . 3. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences , Tabriz, Iran . 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences , Ahvaz, Iran .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Currently applications of artificial neural network (ANN) models in outcome predicting of patients have made considerable strides in clinical medicine. This project aims to use a neural network for predicting survival and length of stay of patients in the ward and the intensive care unit (ICU) of trauma patients and to obtain predictive power of the current method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used Neuro-Solution software (NS), a leading-edge neural network software for data mining to create highly accurate and predictive models using advanced preprocessing techniques, intelligent automated neural network topology through cutting-edge distributed computing. This ANN model was used based on back-propagation, feed forward, and fed by Trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) components, biochemical findings, risk factors and outcome of 95 patients. In the next step a trained ANN was used to predict outcome, ICU and ward length of stay for 30 test group patients by processing primary data. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of an ANN for predicting the outcome of traumatic patients in this study calculated 75% and 96.26%, respectively. 93.33% of outcome predictions obtained by ANN were correct. In 3.33% of predictions, results of ANN were optimistic and 3.33% of cases predicted ANN results were worse than the actual outcome of patients. Neither difference in average length of stay in the ward and ICU with predicted ANN results, were statistically significant. Correlation coefficient of two variables of ANN prediction and actual length of stay in hospital was equal to 0.643. CONCLUSION: Using ANN model based on clinical and biochemical variables in patients with moderate to severe traumatic injury, resulted in satisfactory outcome prediction when applied to a test set.
INTRODUCTION: Currently applications of artificial neural network (ANN) models in outcome predicting of patients have made considerable strides in clinical medicine. This project aims to use a neural network for predicting survival and length of stay of patients in the ward and the intensive care unit (ICU) of traumapatients and to obtain predictive power of the current method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used Neuro-Solution software (NS), a leading-edge neural network software for data mining to create highly accurate and predictive models using advanced preprocessing techniques, intelligent automated neural network topology through cutting-edge distributed computing. This ANN model was used based on back-propagation, feed forward, and fed by Trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) components, biochemical findings, risk factors and outcome of 95 patients. In the next step a trained ANN was used to predict outcome, ICU and ward length of stay for 30 test group patients by processing primary data. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of an ANN for predicting the outcome of traumaticpatients in this study calculated 75% and 96.26%, respectively. 93.33% of outcome predictions obtained by ANN were correct. In 3.33% of predictions, results of ANN were optimistic and 3.33% of cases predicted ANN results were worse than the actual outcome of patients. Neither difference in average length of stay in the ward and ICU with predicted ANN results, were statistically significant. Correlation coefficient of two variables of ANN prediction and actual length of stay in hospital was equal to 0.643. CONCLUSION: Using ANN model based on clinical and biochemical variables in patients with moderate to severe traumatic injury, resulted in satisfactory outcome prediction when applied to a test set.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diagnostic value; Information technology; Trauma
Authors: Pedro Vinícius Staziaki; Di Wu; Jesse C Rayan; Irene Dixe de Oliveira Santo; Feng Nan; Aaron Maybury; Neha Gangasani; Ilan Benador; Venkatesh Saligrama; Jonathan Scalera; Stephan W Anderson Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Bradley M Dennis; David P Stonko; Rachael A Callcut; Richard A Sidwell; Nicole A Stassen; Mitchell J Cohen; Bryan A Cotton; Oscar D Guillamondegui Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Andrew T Hale; David P Stonko; Jaims Lim; Oscar D Guillamondegui; Chevis N Shannon; Mayur B Patel Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 2.713
Authors: Rocco J LaFaro; Suryanarayana Pothula; Keshar Paul Kubal; Mario Emil Inchiosa; Venu M Pothula; Stanley C Yuan; David A Maerz; Lucresia Montes; Stephen M Oleszkiewicz; Albert Yusupov; Richard Perline; Mario Anthony Inchiosa Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Luis Serviá; Neus Montserrat; Mariona Badia; Juan Antonio Llompart-Pou; Jesús Abelardo Barea-Mendoza; Mario Chico-Fernández; Marcelino Sánchez-Casado; José Manuel Jiménez; Dolores María Mayor; Javier Trujillano Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 4.615