Literature DB >> 26023539

Comparison of occlusal contact areas of class I and class II molar relationships at finishing using three-dimensional digital models.

Hyejoon Lee1, Minji Kim1, Youn-Sic Chun1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared occlusal contact areas of ideally planned set-up and accomplished final models against the initial in class I and II molar relationships at finishing.
METHODS: Evaluations were performed for 41 post-orthodontic treatment cases, of which 22 were clinically diagnosed as class I and the remainder were diagnosed as full cusp class II. Class I cases had four first premolars extracted, while class II cases had maxillary first premolars extracted. Occlusal contact areas were measured using a three-dimensional scanner and RapidForm 2004. Independent t-tests were used to validate comparison values between class I and II finishings. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare initial, set up, and final models.
RESULTS: Molars from cases in the class I finishing for the set-up model showed significantly greater contact areas than those from class II finishing (p < 0.05). The final model class I finishing showed significantly larger contact areas for the second molars (p < 0.05). The first molars of the class I finishing for the final model showed a tendency to have larger contact areas than those of class II finishing, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.078).
CONCLUSIONS: In set-up models, posterior occlusal contact was better in class I than in class II finishing. In final models, class I finishing tended to have larger occlusal contact areas than class II finishing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contact area; Molar; Occlusion; Orthodontic treatment; Tooth movement

Year:  2015        PMID: 26023539      PMCID: PMC4446372          DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2015.45.3.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Orthod            Impact factor:   1.372


  10 in total

1.  Reappraisal of Class II molar relationships diagnosed from the lingual side.

Authors:  L D; M B
Journal:  Clin Orthod Res       Date:  2001-05

2.  Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.

Authors:  Ralph Delong; Ching-Chang Ko; Gary C Anderson; James S Hodges; W H Douglas
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Measurement of occlusal contact area effective in mastication.

Authors:  A YURKSTAS; R S MANLY
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1949-03

4.  Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics.

Authors:  J S Casko; J L Vaden; V G Kokich; J Damone; R D James; T J Cangialosi; M L Riolo; S E Owens; E D Bills
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Evaluation of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation using the T-Scan system.

Authors:  V C Garrido García; A García Cartagena; O González Sequeros
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.837

6.  Posttreatment changes of skeletal morphology following treatment aimed at restriction of maxillary growth.

Authors:  V Fotis; B Melsen; S Williams
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1985-10

7.  Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission.

Authors:  C H Gibbs; P E Mahan; H C Lundeen; K Brehnan; E K Walsh; W B Holbrook
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Intercuspal contacts of the natural dentition in centric occlusion.

Authors:  J Ehrlich; S Taicher
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Differences in molar relationships and occlusal contact areas evaluated from the buccal and lingual aspects using 3-dimensional digital models.

Authors:  Sook-Yoon Jang; Minji Kim; Youn-Sic Chun
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique.

Authors:  Jae-Hong Kim; Ki-Baek Kim; Woong-Chul Kim; Ji-Hwan Kim; Hae-Young Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 1.372

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle's classification of malocclusion.

Authors:  Jungin Bae; Woo-Sung Son; Seong-Sik Kim; Soo-Byung Park; Yong-Il Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  An investigation into structural behaviors of skulls chewing food in different occlusal relationships using FEM.

Authors:  Yeo-Kyeong Lee; Youn-Sic Chun
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2019-12-20

3.  Posterior dental compensation and occlusal function in adults with different sagittal skeletal malocclusions.

Authors:  Soonshin Hwang; Yoon Jeong Choi; Sooin Jung; Sujin Kim; Chooryung J Chung; Kyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  The Effects of Orthodontic Brackets on the Time and Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking.

Authors:  Hyojin Heo; Minji Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.