| Literature DB >> 26023339 |
Masoumeh Asgarshirazi1, Mamak Shariat2, Hosein Dalili3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Still there is no consensus on the best treatment for abdominal pain-related functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGIDs).Entities:
Keywords: Abdominal Pain; Mentha Piperita; Synbiotics
Year: 2015 PMID: 26023339 PMCID: PMC4443394 DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.17(4)2015.23844
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran Red Crescent Med J ISSN: 2074-1804 Impact factor: 0.611
Variables Between the Groups[a,b]
| Variable | A (Colpermin) | B (Lactol) | C (Folic acid) | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 7.06 ± 2.38 | 7.44 ± 2.44 | 7.42 ± 2.49 | 0.783 |
|
| 0.190 | |||
| Male | 19 | 13 | 8 | |
| Female | 15 | 16 | 17 | |
|
| 67.05 ± 36.97 | 56.37 ± 25.56 | 53.40 ± 16.81 | 0.154 |
|
| 4.24 ± 1.57 | 4.83 ± 1.64 | 4.44 ± 1.87 | 0.381 |
|
| 5.23 ± 1.34 | 5.75 ± 1.21 | 5.20 ± 1.15 | 0.172 |
|
| 0.674 | |||
| Periumblical | 20 | 16 | 12 | |
| LLQ-Hypogastric | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| Epigastric | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Diverse pain | 9 | 11 | 10 | |
|
| 0.608 | |||
| FAP | 19 | 15 | 11 | |
| Dyspepsia | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| IBS | 9 | 10 | 11 | |
| APS | 5 | 2 | 1 |
aAbbreviations: APS, Abdominal Pain Syndrome; FAP, Functional Abdominal Pain; IBS, Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
bData are presented as Mean ± SD.
cANOVA analyse.
dChi-square test.
Figure 1.Consort Flow Chart
Means and Standard Deviations of Scores Before and After the Intervention [a]
| Variable | A (Colpermin, n = 34) | B (Lactol, n = 29) | C (Placebo, n = 25) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Final | Baseline | Final | Baseline | Final | |
|
| 67.05 ± 36.97 | 26.17 ± 11.61 | 56.37 ± 25.56 | 37.06 ± 25.51 | 53.40 ± 16.81 | 51.60 ± 23.74 |
|
| 0.0001 | 0.008 | 0.730 | |||
|
| 4.24 ± 1.57 | 2.00 ± 0.98 | 4.83 ± 1.64 | 2.14 ± 0.87 | 4.44 ± 1.87) | 3.40 ± 1.41) |
|
| 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.032 | |||
|
| 5.23 ± 1.34 | 3.11 ± 1.36 | 5.75 ± 1.21 | 3.93 ± 1.06 | 5.20 ± 1.15 | 4.24 ± 1.33 |
|
| 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.002 | |||
aPaired t-test.
Comparison Between Drugs and Placebo and Between Two Drugs[a]
| Mean Changes in Pain Duration | Mean Changes in Pain Frequency | Mean Changes in Pain Severity | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 40.882 | 2.235 | 2.117 |
|
| 1.800 | 1.040 | 0.960 |
|
| 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.001 |
|
| 19.310 | 2.690 | 1.827 |
|
| 1.800 | 1.040 | 0.960 |
|
| 0.012 | 0.0001 | 0.373 |
|
| 40.882 | 2.235 | 2.117 |
|
| 19.310 | 2.690 | 1.827 |
|
| 0.040 | 0.619 | 0.013 |
aGLM analysis.
Figure 2.Comparison of Frequency Changes Between Groups
Figure 4.Comparison of Pain Severity Changes Between Groups