Literature DB >> 26023084

New DNA Methylation Markers for Pancreatic Cancer: Discovery, Tissue Validation, and Pilot Testing in Pancreatic Juice.

John B Kisiel1, Massimo Raimondo2, William R Taylor3, Tracy C Yab3, Douglas W Mahoney4, Zhifu Sun4, Sumit Middha4, Saurabh Baheti4, Hongzhi Zou5, Thomas C Smyrk6, Lisa A Boardman3, Gloria M Petersen7, David A Ahlquist3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Discriminant markers for pancreatic cancer detection are needed. We sought to identify and validate methylated DNA markers for pancreatic cancer using next-generation sequencing unbiased by known targets. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: At a referral center, we conducted four sequential case-control studies: discovery, technical validation, biologic validation, and clinical piloting. Candidate markers were identified using variance-inflated logistic regression on reduced-representation bisulfite DNA sequencing results from matched pancreatic cancers, benign pancreas, and normal colon tissues. Markers were validated technically on replicate discovery study DNA and biologically on independent, matched, blinded tissues by methylation-specific PCR. Clinical testing of six methylation candidates and mutant KRAS was performed on secretin-stimulated pancreatic juice samples from 61 patients with pancreatic cancer, 22 with chronic pancreatitis, and 19 with normal pancreas on endoscopic ultrasound. Areas under receiver-operating characteristics curves (AUC) for markers were calculated.
RESULTS: Sequencing identified >500 differentially hyper-methylated regions. On independent tissues, AUC on 19 selected markers ranged between 0.73 and 0.97. Pancreatic juice AUC values for CD1D, KCNK12, CLEC11A, NDRG4, IKZF1, PKRCB, and KRAS were 0.92*, 0.88, 0.85, 0.85, 0.84, 0.83, and 0.75, respectively, for pancreatic cancer compared with normal pancreas and 0.92*, 0.73, 0.76, 0.85*, 0.73, 0.77, and 0.62 for pancreatic cancer compared with chronic pancreatitis (*, P = 0.001 vs. KRAS).
CONCLUSIONS: We identified and validated novel DNA methylation markers strongly associated with pancreatic cancer. On pilot testing in pancreatic juice, best markers (especially CD1D) highly discriminated pancreatic cases from controls. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26023084      PMCID: PMC4592385          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  32 in total

Review 1.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; N Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Association of tissue-specific differentially methylated regions (TDMs) with differential gene expression.

Authors:  Fei Song; Joseph F Smith; Makoto T Kimura; Arlene D Morrow; Tomoki Matsuyama; Hiroki Nagase; William A Held
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis.

Authors:  Peter W Laird
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Do cytokine concentrations in pancreatic juice predict the presence of pancreatic diseases?

Authors:  Kyung W Noh; Surakit Pungpapong; Michael B Wallace; Timothy A Woodward; Massimo Raimondo
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  CpG island methylation profile of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Norihiro Sato; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Ralph H Hruban; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Genome-wide profiling of methylated promoters in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Noriyuki Omura; Chung-Pin Li; Ang Li; Seung-Mo Hong; Kimberly Walter; Antonio Jimeno; Manuel Hidalgo; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.742

7.  K-ras mutations in stools and tissue samples from patients with malignant and nonmalignant pancreatic diseases.

Authors:  C Berndt; K Haubold; F Wenger; B Brux; J Müller; P Bendzko; T Hillebrand; E Köttgen; J Zanow
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Quantitative comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation mapping technologies.

Authors:  Christoph Bock; Eleni M Tomazou; Arie B Brinkman; Fabian Müller; Femke Simmer; Hongcang Gu; Natalie Jäger; Andreas Gnirke; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Shinichi Yachida; Siân Jones; Ivana Bozic; Tibor Antal; Rebecca Leary; Baojin Fu; Mihoko Kamiyama; Ralph H Hruban; James R Eshleman; Martin A Nowak; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Genome-scale DNA methylation mapping of clinical samples at single-nucleotide resolution.

Authors:  Hongcang Gu; Christoph Bock; Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Natalie Jäger; Zachary D Smith; Eleni Tomazou; Andreas Gnirke; Eric S Lander; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-01-10       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  52 in total

1.  Endoscopic Ultrasonography: From the Origins to Routine EUS.

Authors:  Eugene P DiMagno; Matthew J DiMagno
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Predicting the Grade of Dysplasia of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms Using Cyst Fluid DNA Methylation Markers.

Authors:  Tatsuo Hata; Marco Dal Molin; Seung-Mo Hong; Koji Tamura; Masaya Suenaga; Jun Yu; Hiraku Sedogawa; Matthew J Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Anne Marie Lennon; Ralph H Hruban; Michael G Goggins
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Molecular Diagnostics and Testing for Pancreatic Cysts.

Authors:  Jaime de la Fuente; Shounak Majumder
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-27

4.  Pancreatic Juice Mutation Concentrations Can Help Predict the Grade of Dysplasia in Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Surveillance.

Authors:  Masaya Suenaga; Jun Yu; Koji Shindo; Koji Tamura; Jose Alejandro Almario; Christopher Zaykoski; P Dane Witmer; Shahriar Fesharakizadeh; Michael Borges; Anne-Marie Lennon; Eun-Ji Shin; Marcia Irene Canto; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Non-invasive biomarkers in pancreatic cancer diagnosis: what we need versus what we have.

Authors:  Marta Herreros-Villanueva; Luis Bujanda
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

Review 6.  Endoscopic Pancreas Fluid Collection: Methods and Relevance for Clinical Care and Translational Science.

Authors:  Phil A Hart; Mark Topazian; Massimo Raimondo; Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate; William E Fisher; Gregory B Lesinski; Hanno Steen; Darwin L Conwell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  The Effect of Pancreatic Juice Collection Time on the Detection of KRAS Mutations.

Authors:  Masaya Suenaga; Beth Dudley; Eve Karloski; Michael Borges; Marcia Irene Canto; Randall E Brand; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Methylated DNA in Pancreatic Juice Distinguishes Patients With Pancreatic Cancer From Controls.

Authors:  Shounak Majumder; Massimo Raimondo; William R Taylor; Tracy C Yab; Calise K Berger; Brian A Dukek; Xiaoming Cao; Patrick H Foote; Chung Wah Wu; Mary E Devens; Douglas W Mahoney; Thomas C Smyrk; Rahul Pannala; Suresh T Chari; Santhi Swaroop Vege; Mark D Topazian; Bret T Petersen; Michael J Levy; Elizabeth Rajan; Ferga C Gleeson; Barham Abu Dayyeh; Cuong C Nguyen; Douglas O Faigel; Timothy A Woodward; Michael B Wallace; Gloria Petersen; Hatim T Allawi; Graham P Lidgard; John B Kisiel; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 9.  Surveillance for neoplasia in the pancreas.

Authors:  Kasper A Overbeek; Djuna L Cahen; Marcia Irene Canto; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 3.043

10.  A suite of DNA methylation markers that can detect most common human cancers.

Authors:  Lukas Vrba; Bernard W Futscher
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.