Literature DB >> 26022409

Predicting the preservation of cultural artefacts and buried materials in soil.

Mark Kibblewhite1, Gergely Tóth2, Tamás Hermann3.   

Abstract

This study identifies factors affecting the fate of buried objects in soil and develops a method for assessing where preservation of different materials and stratigraphic evidence is more or less likely in the landscape. The results inform the extent of the cultural service that soil supports by preserving artefacts from and information about past societies. They are also relevant to predicting the state of existing and planned buried infrastructure and the persistence of materials spread on land. Soils are variable and preserve different materials and stratigraphic evidence differently. This study identifies the material and soil properties that affect preservation and relates these to soil types; it assesses their preservation capacities for bones, teeth and shells, organic materials, metals (Au, Ag, Cu, Fe, Pb and bronze), ceramics, glass and stratigraphic evidence. Preservation of Au, Pb and ceramics, glass and phytoliths is good in most soils but degradation rates of other materials (e.g. Fe and organic materials) is strongly influenced by soil type. A method is proposed for using data on the distribution of soil types to map the variable preservation capacities of soil for different materials. This is applied at a continental scale across the EU for bones, teeth and shells, organic materials, metals (Cu, bronze and Fe) and stratigraphic evidence. The maps produced demonstrate how soil provides an extensive but variable preservation of buried objects.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Archaeology; Artefacts; Burial; Cultural services; Preservation; Soil; Stratigraphy

Year:  2015        PMID: 26022409     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

1.  A new perspective on studying burial environment before archaeological excavation: analyzing bacterial community distribution by high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Jinjin Xu; Yanfei Wei; Hanqing Jia; Lin Xiao; Decai Gong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Surface chromium on Terracotta Army bronze weapons is neither an ancient anti-rust treatment nor the reason for their good preservation.

Authors:  Marcos Martinón-Torres; Xiuzhen Li; Yin Xia; Agnese Benzonelli; Andrew Bevan; Shengtao Ma; Jianhua Huang; Liang Wang; Desheng Lan; Jiangwei Liu; Siran Liu; Zhen Zhao; Kun Zhao; Thilo Rehren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Palynological evidence for pre-agricultural reindeer grazing and the later settlement history of the Lycksele region, northern Sweden.

Authors:  Ilse M Kamerling; J Edward Schofield; Kevin J Edwards
Journal:  Archaeol Anthropol Sci       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 1.989

4.  Function, life histories, and biographies of Lower Paleolithic patinated flint tools from Late Acheulian Revadim, Israel.

Authors:  Bar Efrati; Ran Barkai; Stella Nunziante Cesaro; Flavia Venditti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Unique chemical parameters and microbial activity lead to increased archaeological preservation at the Roman frontier site of Vindolanda, UK.

Authors:  C H Orr; R Williams; H H Halldórsdóttir; A Birley; E Greene; A Nelson; T K Ralebitso-Senior; G Taylor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Morphological Study of Bio-Based Polymers in the Consolidation of Waterlogged Wooden Objects.

Authors:  Zarah Walsh-Korb; Ingrid Stelzner; Juliana Dos Santos Gabriel; Gerhard Eggert; Luc Avérous
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.