BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Empirical antifungal therapy prevents invasive fungal infections in patients with cancer. This study assessed the empirical efficacy of intravenous itraconazole in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and investigated the pharmacokinetics and clinical implications. METHODS: Oral itraconazole syrup was started (2.5 mg/kg twice daily) for prophylaxis, and patients with persistent neutropenic fever for more than 2 days were switched to intravenous itraconazole (5 mg/kg twice daily for 2 days for induction and 5 mg/kg daily for maintenance) as empirical treatment. Empirical antifungal efficacy was assessed retrospectively in 159 transplantations, and a full pharmacokinetic study was prospectively conducted in six of these patients. Successful antifungal efficacy was defined as the fulfillment of all components of a five-part composite end point. RESULTS: The overall empirical antifungal success rate fulfilling all criteria was 42.1 %. No death or drug-related serious adverse events occurred during the study. Mean trough plasma concentration of itraconazole after oral prophylaxis and intravenous induction were 577.2 and 1659.7 μg/L, respectively. Mean area under the concentration-time curve of itraconazole and its metabolite at steady state were 42,837 ± 24,746 μg·h/L and 63,094 ± 19,255 μg·h/L. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous itraconazole was effective and safe as an empirical antifungal agent in pediatric patients; this was due to the fast and satisfactory increase in drug concentration by switching from oral to intravenous therapy.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Empirical antifungal therapy prevents invasive fungal infections in patients with cancer. This study assessed the empirical efficacy of intravenous itraconazole in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and investigated the pharmacokinetics and clinical implications. METHODS: Oral itraconazole syrup was started (2.5 mg/kg twice daily) for prophylaxis, and patients with persistent neutropenic fever for more than 2 days were switched to intravenous itraconazole (5 mg/kg twice daily for 2 days for induction and 5 mg/kg daily for maintenance) as empirical treatment. Empirical antifungal efficacy was assessed retrospectively in 159 transplantations, and a full pharmacokinetic study was prospectively conducted in six of these patients. Successful antifungal efficacy was defined as the fulfillment of all components of a five-part composite end point. RESULTS: The overall empirical antifungal success rate fulfilling all criteria was 42.1 %. No death or drug-related serious adverse events occurred during the study. Mean trough plasma concentration of itraconazole after oral prophylaxis and intravenous induction were 577.2 and 1659.7 μg/L, respectively. Mean area under the concentration-time curve of itraconazole and its metabolite at steady state were 42,837 ± 24,746 μg·h/L and 63,094 ± 19,255 μg·h/L. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous itraconazole was effective and safe as an empirical antifungal agent in pediatric patients; this was due to the fast and satisfactory increase in drug concentration by switching from oral to intravenous therapy.
Authors: L Grigull; O Kuehlke; A Beilken; A Sander; C Linderkamp; H Schmid; K Seidemann; K W Sykora; F R Schuster; K Welte Journal: Pediatr Transplant Date: 2007-05
Authors: J Heykants; A Van Peer; V Van de Velde; P Van Rooy; W Meuldermans; K Lavrijsen; R Woestenborghs; J Van Cutsem; G Cauwenbergh Journal: Mycoses Date: 1989 Impact factor: 4.377
Authors: Thomas J Walsh; Hedy Teppler; Gerald R Donowitz; Johan A Maertens; Lindsey R Baden; Anna Dmoszynska; Oliver A Cornely; Michael R Bourque; Robert J Lupinacci; Carole A Sable; Ben E dePauw Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-09-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Susan M Abdel-Rahman; Richard F Jacobs; Joseph Massarella; Ralph E Kauffman; John S Bradley; Hui C Kimko; Gregory L Kearns; Kevin Shalayda; Christopher Curtin; Samuel D Maldonado; Jeffrey L Blumer Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2007-05-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ben De Pauw; Thomas J Walsh; J Peter Donnelly; David A Stevens; John E Edwards; Thierry Calandra; Peter G Pappas; Johan Maertens; Olivier Lortholary; Carol A Kauffman; David W Denning; Thomas F Patterson; Georg Maschmeyer; Jacques Bille; William E Dismukes; Raoul Herbrecht; William W Hope; Christopher C Kibbler; Bart Jan Kullberg; Kieren A Marr; Patricia Muñoz; Frank C Odds; John R Perfect; Angela Restrepo; Markus Ruhnke; Brahm H Segal; Jack D Sobel; Tania C Sorrell; Claudio Viscoli; John R Wingard; Theoklis Zaoutis; John E Bennett Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Hyeong Jin Lee; Bongjin Lee; June Dong Park; Hyung Joo Jeong; Yu Hyeon Choi; Hee Young Ju; Che Ry Hong; Ji Won Lee; Hyery Kim; Dong In Suh; Kyung Duk Park; Hyoung Jin Kang; Hee Young Shin; Hyo Seop Ahn Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 4.162