N Homer1, D S Grewal1,2, R G Mirza1, A T Lyon1, M K Gill1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Eye Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate frequency of injections, visual and anatomical outcomes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients transitioned to intravitreal aflibercept after failure to extend treatment interval beyond 8 weeks with prior intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with nAMD switched to aflibercept following ≥ 6 prior intravitreal ranibizumab or bevacizumab injections at 4-8-week intervals. Three monthly aflibercept injections were given followed by a treat-and-extend dosing regimen. RESULTS: Twenty-one eyes of 18 patients who had received a mean of 23.8 ± 18.8 (mean ± SD; range 6-62) prior ranibizumab or bevacizumab injections were included. Over a mean follow-up of 24 months after the transition, 9.2 ± 2.9 (range 4-21) aflibercept injections were required. Interval between aflibercept injections increased to 57.3 days (range 35-133 days), as compared with 37 ± 6.1 days (range 29-54 days) with the prior agents (P = 0.01). Mean best-corrected visual acuity was preserved (0.42 ± 0.31 vs 0.42 ± 0.23 logMAR; P = 0.2). Mean OCT central subfoveal thickness (292.1 ± 83.2 μm to 283.6 ± 78.6 μm; P = 0.4) and mean macular volume (7.9 ± 0.95 mm(3) to 7.67 ± 0.94 mm(3); P = 0.16) remained stable. CONCLUSION: Patients requiring treatment more frequently than every 8 weeks with ranibizumab and bevacizumab were transitioned to > 8-week treatment interval with aflibercept while maintaining the anatomic and visual gains.
PURPOSE: To evaluate frequency of injections, visual and anatomical outcomes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients transitioned to intravitreal aflibercept after failure to extend treatment interval beyond 8 weeks with prior intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with nAMD switched to aflibercept following ≥ 6 prior intravitreal ranibizumab or bevacizumab injections at 4-8-week intervals. Three monthly aflibercept injections were given followed by a treat-and-extend dosing regimen. RESULTS: Twenty-one eyes of 18 patients who had received a mean of 23.8 ± 18.8 (mean ± SD; range 6-62) prior ranibizumab or bevacizumab injections were included. Over a mean follow-up of 24 months after the transition, 9.2 ± 2.9 (range 4-21) aflibercept injections were required. Interval between aflibercept injections increased to 57.3 days (range 35-133 days), as compared with 37 ± 6.1 days (range 29-54 days) with the prior agents (P = 0.01). Mean best-corrected visual acuity was preserved (0.42 ± 0.31 vs 0.42 ± 0.23 logMAR; P = 0.2). Mean OCT central subfoveal thickness (292.1 ± 83.2 μm to 283.6 ± 78.6 μm; P = 0.4) and mean macular volume (7.9 ± 0.95 mm(3) to 7.67 ± 0.94 mm(3); P = 0.16) remained stable. CONCLUSION:Patients requiring treatment more frequently than every 8 weeks with ranibizumab and bevacizumab were transitioned to > 8-week treatment interval with aflibercept while maintaining the anatomic and visual gains.
Authors: Nishant Kumar; Marcela Marsiglia; Sarah Mrejen; Adrian Tien-Chin Fung; Jason Slakter; John Sorenson; K Bailey Freund Journal: Retina Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Omesh P Gupta; Gary Shienbaum; Avni H Patel; Christopher Fecarotta; Richard S Kaiser; Carl D Regillo Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Wyatt B Messenger; J Peter Campbell; Ambar Faridi; Loton Shippey; Steven T Bailey; Andreas K Lauer; Christina J Flaxel; Thomas S Hwang Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Gary Shienbaum; Omesh P Gupta; Christopher Fecarotta; Avni H Patel; Richard S Kaiser; Carl D Regillo Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Andrew A Chang; Haitao Li; Geoffrey K Broadhead; Thomas Hong; Timothy E Schlub; Wijeyanthy Wijeyakumar; Meidong Zhu Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jeffrey S Heier; David M Brown; Victor Chong; Jean-Francois Korobelnik; Peter K Kaiser; Quan Dong Nguyen; Bernd Kirchhof; Allen Ho; Yuichiro Ogura; George D Yancopoulos; Neil Stahl; Robert Vitti; Alyson J Berliner; Yuhwen Soo; Majid Anderesi; Georg Groetzbach; Bernd Sommerauer; Rupert Sandbrink; Christian Simader; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: L Tiosano; O Segal; N Mathalone; A Pollack; R Ehrlich; I Klemperer; Y Barak; I Moroz; I Chowers; M Goldstein Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Maria Waizel; Margarita G Todorova; Michael Masyk; Katharina Wolf; Annekatrin Rickmann; Khaled Helaiwa; Björn R Blanke; Peter Szurman Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 2.209
Authors: Theodoros Empeslidis; Matthew Storey; Theodoros Giannopoulos; Vassileios Konidaris; Paris G Tranos; Evangelia S Panagiotou; Irini C Voudouragkaki; Anastasios G Konstas Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Peter J Kertes; Ivan J Galic; Mark Greve; Geoff Williams; Jason Baker; Marcel Lahaie; Tom Sheidow Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 7.389