Hasan O Topçu1, Can T İskender2, Hakan Timur2, Oktay Kaymak2, Tuba Memur2, Nuri Danışman2. 1. Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: dronurtopcu@gmail.com. 2. Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether myomectomy during cesarean delivery is safe and feasible among pregnant women with leiomyomas. METHODS: In a retrospective study, data were reviewed from pregnant women with uterine leiomyomas who delivered by cesarean at a center in Turkey between May 1, 2007, and April 30, 2014. Women were divided into two groups: cesarean myomectomy (CM) or cesarean only (CO). Data were analyzed for characteristics of the uterine leiomyomas, hematologic changes occurring between the preoperative and postoperative periods, duration of the operation, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Overall, 76 women formed the CM group and 60 formed the CO group. The mean diameter of the leiomyomas did not differ between CM and CO groups (4.6±2.5cm vs 5.2±2.2cm; P=0.175). More patients in the CM group than in the CO group had subserous (24 [31.6%] vs 7 [11.7%]; P=0.006) and uterine corpus (57 [75.0%] vs 30 [50.0%]; P=0.003) leiomyomas. Fewer patients in the CM group had intramural (44 [57.9%] vs 49 [81.7%]; P=0.003) and fundal (15 [19.7%] vs 25 [41.7%]; P=0.005) leiomyomas. CONCLUSION: Surgeons were more likely to remove corporal and subserous leiomyomas than other types; size did not seem to affect decision making. CM can be a safe operation for some patients.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether myomectomy during cesarean delivery is safe and feasible among pregnant women with leiomyomas. METHODS: In a retrospective study, data were reviewed from pregnant women with uterine leiomyomas who delivered by cesarean at a center in Turkey between May 1, 2007, and April 30, 2014. Women were divided into two groups: cesarean myomectomy (CM) or cesarean only (CO). Data were analyzed for characteristics of the uterine leiomyomas, hematologic changes occurring between the preoperative and postoperative periods, duration of the operation, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Overall, 76 women formed the CM group and 60 formed the CO group. The mean diameter of the leiomyomas did not differ between CM and CO groups (4.6±2.5cm vs 5.2±2.2cm; P=0.175). More patients in the CM group than in the CO group had subserous (24 [31.6%] vs 7 [11.7%]; P=0.006) and uterine corpus (57 [75.0%] vs 30 [50.0%]; P=0.003) leiomyomas. Fewer patients in the CM group had intramural (44 [57.9%] vs 49 [81.7%]; P=0.003) and fundal (15 [19.7%] vs 25 [41.7%]; P=0.005) leiomyomas. CONCLUSION: Surgeons were more likely to remove corporal and subserous leiomyomas than other types; size did not seem to affect decision making. CM can be a safe operation for some patients.