Literature DB >> 26021721

Strikingly rapid neural basis of motion-induced position shifts revealed by high temporal-resolution EEG pattern classification.

Hinze Hogendoorn1, Frans A J Verstraten2, Patrick Cavanagh3.   

Abstract

Several visual illusions demonstrate that the neural processing of visual position can be affected by visual motion. Well-known examples are the flash-lag, flash-drag, and flash-jump effect. However, where and when in the visual processing hierarchy such interactions take place is unclear. Here, we used a variant of the flash-grab illusion (Vision Research 91 (2013), pp. 8-20) to shift the perceived positions of flashed stimuli, and applied multivariate pattern classification to individual 64-channel EEG trials to dissociate neural signals corresponding to veridical versus perceived position with high temporal resolution. We show illusory effects of motion on perceived position in three separate analyses: (1) A classifier can distinguish different perceived positions of a flashed object, even when the veridical positions are identical. (2) When the perceived positions of two objects presented in different locations become more similar, the classifier performs less well than when they become more different, even if the veridical positions remain unchanged. (3) Finally, a classifier can discriminate the perceived position of an object even when trained on objects presented in physically different positions. These effects are evident as early as 81ms post-stimulus, concurrent with the very first EEG signals indicating that any stimulus is present at all. This finding shows that the illusion must begin at an early level, probably as part of a predominantly feed-forward mechanism, leaving the influence of any recurrent processes to later stages in the development of the effect.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decoding; EEG; Flash-grab; Illusion; Motion-induced position-shift; Visual Awareness

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26021721     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Motion Extrapolation for Eye Movements Predicts Perceived Motion-Induced Position Shifts.

Authors:  Elle van Heusden; Martin Rolfs; Patrick Cavanagh; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Self-touch modulates the somatosensory evoked P100.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn; Marjolein Kammers; Patrick Haggard; Frans Verstraten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Motion-Induced Position Shifts Activate Early Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Peter J Kohler; Patrick Cavanagh; Peter U Tse
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  Predictive Coding with Neural Transmission Delays: A Real-Time Temporal Alignment Hypothesis.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn; Anthony N Burkitt
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-05-07

6.  Motion extrapolation in the High-Phi illusion: Analogous but dissociable effects on perceived position and perceived motion.

Authors:  Philippa Johnson; Sidney Davies; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The Decision Decoding ToolBOX (DDTBOX) - A Multivariate Pattern Analysis Toolbox for Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Stefan Bode; Daniel Feuerriegel; Daniel Bennett; Phillip M Alday
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2019-01

8.  Adaptation to feedback representation of illusory orientation produced from flash grab effect.

Authors:  Yijun Ge; Hao Zhou; Chencan Qian; Peng Zhang; Lan Wang; Sheng He
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.