Literature DB >> 26021347

The DSM 5 and the Istanbul Protocol: Diagnosis of psychological sequels of torture.

Thomas Wenzel1, Andreas Frewer, Siroos Mirzaei.   

Abstract

The Manual on Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, commonly known as the Istanbul Protocol, is an interdisciplinary standard supported by, among others, the United Nations and the World Medical Association. It aims at aiding the fight against torture by giving clear guidelines to ensure better and more effective assessment of physical and psychological sequels. Mental health is a key aspect of diagnostical assessment and documentation due to the severe and frequently long-lasting impact of torture that often lasts longer than physical sequels. The inclusion of psychological aspects and a psychiatric diagnosis is to be treated as an important obligatory. Care must be taken to avoid common pitfalls. The new and substantial revisions in the frequently used but also criticised Diagnostical and Statistical Manual (DSM) reflect challenges and opportunities in a comprehensive approach to the documentation of torture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26021347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Torture        ISSN: 1018-8185


  3 in total

1.  Cross-sectional study on awareness and knowledge of torture investigation and documentation among Greek doctors and senior medical students.

Authors:  Christina Orfanou; Costas Tsiamis; Evika Karamagioli; Anastasia Pikouli; Agis Terzidis; Emmanuel Pikoulis
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Associations between memory loss and trauma in US asylum seekers: A retrospective review of medico-legal affidavits.

Authors:  Altaf Saadi; Kathryn Hampton; Maria Vassimon de Assis; Ranit Mishori; Hajar Habbach; Rohini J Haar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Psychopathology and Quality of Life in Traumatized or Victimized Underage Individuals as Factors for Forensic Multilevel Assessment-A Pilot Investigation.

Authors:  Sabine Voelkl-Kernstock; Maria Kletecka-Pulker; Anna Felnhofer; Oswald David Kothgassner; Katrin Skala; Brigitte Hansmann; Thomas Wenzel
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.