| Literature DB >> 26021288 |
Scott A Socolofsky1, E Eric Adams2, Michel C Boufadel3, Zachary M Aman4, Øistein Johansen5, Wolfgang J Konkel6, David Lindo7, Mads N Madsen8, Elizabeth W North9, Claire B Paris10, Dorte Rasmussen11, Mark Reed12, Petter Rønningen13, Lawrence H Sim14, Thomas Uhrenholdt15, Karl G Anderson16, Cortis Cooper17, Tim J Nedwed18.
Abstract
We compare oil spill model predictions for a prototype subsea blowout with and without subsea injection of chemical dispersants in deep and shallow water, for high and low gas-oil ratio, and in weak to strong crossflows. Model results are compared for initial oil droplet size distribution, the nearfield plume, and the farfield Lagrangian particle tracking stage of hydrocarbon transport. For the conditions tested (a blowout with oil flow rate of 20,000 bbl/d, about 1/3 of the Deepwater Horizon), the models predict the volume median droplet diameter at the source to range from 0.3 to 6mm without dispersant and 0.01 to 0.8 mm with dispersant. This reduced droplet size owing to reduced interfacial tension results in a one to two order of magnitude increase in the downstream displacement of the initial oil surfacing zone and may lead to a significant fraction of the spilled oil not reaching the sea surface.Entities:
Keywords: Chemical dispersant; Droplet size distribution; Lagrangian particle tracking; Model prediction; Multiphase plume; Subsea blowout
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26021288 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.05.039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Pollut Bull ISSN: 0025-326X Impact factor: 5.553