Literature DB >> 26020348

Composition and quality characteristics of carcasses from pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake on high- or low-energy diets.

E K Arkfeld, J M Young, R C Johnson, C A Fedler, K Prusa, J F Patience, J C M Dekkers, N K Gabler, S M Lonergan, E Huff-Lonergan.   

Abstract

The objective was to determine the extent to which feeding low-energy, high-fiber (LEHF) and high-energy, low-fiber (HELF) diets impacts meat quality and carcass composition of pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake (RFI). Two experiments were conducted in the divergently selected Iowa State University RFI lines: Exp. 1 evaluated carcasses of generation (G) 8 pigs fed on commercial feeders; Exp. 2 evaluated composition, pork quality, sensory, and postmortem proteolysis of pigs fed on electronic single-space feeders in G 8 and 9. Pigs (N = 177) in Exp. 1 were randomly assigned a pen (mixed sex and line; N = 8). Groups (n = 3) of pigs were slaughtered at a mean BW of 121.5 kg. Pigs in Exp. 2 (G8: n = 158; G9: n = 157) were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 pens of each diet per G. Pigs from G8 were slaughtered at a mean BW of 122.5 kg and G9 at a mean of 128.4 kg. Data were analyzed using the mixed procedure of SAS. Fixed effects were line, diet, sex, and all appropriate interactions. Random effects were group, pen, litter, and sire and covariate of off-test BW. For Exp. 2, G was added as a fixed effect and sensory day was added as a random effect when applicable. In Exp. 1, carcasses from low RFI (LRFI) pigs were leaner and had less fat depth (P < 0.01). Carcasses from pigs fed the LEHF diet had a lighter HCW and greater estimated percent lean than pigs fed HELF diet (P < 0.01). In Exp. 2, LRFI pigs on the HELF diet had the greatest loin depth (P < 0.01). Chops from HRFI pigs had greater drip loss, color scores, lean tissue a*, and percent lipid and lesser percent moisture than LRFI ( P< 0.05). Chops from pigs on the LEHF diet had lesser muscle L* values and greater percent moisture than chops from pigs fed the HELF diet (P < 0.05). Chops from LRFI pigs were juicer than those from HRFI pigs (P < 0.05). Protein extracted at d 2 postmortem from LRFI pigs on the LEHF diet had a greater 38 kDa desmin degradation product than protein from LRFI pigs fed the HELF diet (P < 0.05). Day 5 postmortem extracted protein from HRFI pigs had greater 38 kDa desmin degradation product than LRFI (P = 0.05). Pigs fed LEHF (P < 0.01) had adipose with a greater iodine value than adipose from HELF fed pigs. Pork sensory quality from pigs differentially selected for residual feed intake was not influenced by energy content of the diet the pigs were fed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26020348     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Effect of a dual enteric and respiratory pathogen challenge on swine growth, efficiency, carcass composition, and pork quality1.

Authors:  Amanda C Outhouse; Emma T Helm; Brian M Patterson; Jack C M Dekkers; Wendy M Rauw; Kent J Schwartz; Nicholas K Gabler; Elisabeth Huff-Lonergan; Steven M Lonergan
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of lower-energy, higher-fiber diets on pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake when fed higher-energy, lower-fiber diets.

Authors:  E D Mauch; J M Young; N V L Serão; W L Hsu; J F Patience; B J Kerr; T E Weber; N K Gabler; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Whole Blood Transcriptomics Is Relevant to Identify Molecular Changes in Response to Genetic Selection for Feed Efficiency and Nutritional Status in the Pig.

Authors:  Maëva Jégou; Florence Gondret; Annie Vincent; Christine Tréfeu; Hélène Gilbert; Isabelle Louveau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Review: divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.

Authors:  H Gilbert; Y Billon; L Brossard; J Faure; P Gatellier; F Gondret; E Labussière; B Lebret; L Lefaucheur; N Le Floch; I Louveau; E Merlot; M-C Meunier-Salaün; L Montagne; P Mormede; D Renaudeau; J Riquet; C Rogel-Gaillard; J van Milgen; A Vincent; J Noblet
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Impact of a high-fibre diet on genetic parameters of production traits in growing pigs.

Authors:  V Déru; A Bouquet; C Hassenfratz; B Blanchet; C Carillier-Jacquin; H Gilbert
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Nutritional approaches to slow late finishing pig growth: implications on carcass composition and pork quality.

Authors:  Emma T Helm; Jason W Ross; John F Patience; Steven M Lonergan; Elisabeth Huff-Lonergan; Laura L Greiner; Leah M Reever; Chad W Hastad; Emily K Arkfeld; Nicholas K Gabler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Post-weaning blood transcriptomic differences between Yorkshire pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.

Authors:  Haibo Liu; Yet T Nguyen; Dan Nettleton; Jack C M Dekkers; Christopher K Tuggle
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.