Literature DB >> 26020332

Effects of roughage sources produced in a tropical environment on forage intake, and ruminal and microbial parameters.

R C O Ribeiro, S D J Villela, S C Valadares Filho, S A Santos, K G Ribeiro, E Detmann, D Zanetti, P G M A Martins.   

Abstract

Our objective was to study the effect of different roughage sources produced in a tropical environment on intake, digestibility, and ruminal parameters of crossbred bulls. Five rumen-fistulated 30-mo-old Holstein × Bos indicus bulls (average BW =459 ± 32.5 kg) were utilized in a 5 × 5 randomized Latin square design. The experiment consisted of five 19-d experimental periods (10 d for adaptation and 9 d for data collection) and 5 treatments. Experimental diets consisted of corn (Zea mays L.) silage (CS), Brachiaria grass (Brachiaria decumbens Stapf.) silage (BGS), elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach.) silage(EGS), Tifton 85 (Cynodon spp.) hay (T85), and fresh sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.; SC). Diets were formulated to have approximately 11% CP (DM basis)using a mixture of urea and ammonium sulfate (9:1 ratio) that was diluted in water and then mixed with roughage. Intake, ruminal outflow, digestibility coefficients,ruminal pool, intake, passage (kp) and digestion rates, microbial parameters, and pH data were assessed.D ry matter intake was greater (P < 0.01) for CS compared with SC. Among treatments, lesser (P < 0.01)potentially digestible NDF, ash- and protein-free NDF(apNDF), and digestible ash- and protein-free NDF intake values were observed for SC. Ruminal outflows of DM and nonfibrous carbohydrates were lesser (P <0.01) for SC compared with other treatments. Dry matter apparent digestibility and ruminal digestibility did not differ (P > 0.27) among treatments. No differences (P = 0.11) were observed for ruminal apNDF pool and ruminal kp of apNDF (P = 0.06) among treatments. No treatment effect (P > 0.28) was observed for DM and nitrogen of rumen-isolated bacteria, and microbial efficiency was greater (P = 0.02) for BGS among treatments.A treatment × time interaction (P < 0.01) was found for ruminal pH, with a quadratic pattern in terms of time for CS, BGS, EGS, and T85, whereas pH values for CA linearly decreased as a function of time. In summary, these roughages, when supplemented with an additional nitrogen sources, show similar overall apparent digestibility and ruminal pool values, but conversely, bulls fed sugarcane had less overall nutrient intake and lower ruminal outflow and digestion rate values. We conclude that fresh-cut sugarcane, when provided with urea, can affect digestion rate and, consequently, impact nutrient intake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26020332     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  Strategic supplementation of cassava top silage to enhance rumen fermentation and milk production in lactating dairy cows in the tropics.

Authors:  Metha Wanapat; Kampanat Phesatcha; Bounnaxay Viennasay; Burarat Phesatcha; Thiwakorn Ampapon; Sungchhang Kang
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Effects of High Forage/Concentrate Diet on Volatile Fatty Acid Production and the Microorganisms Involved in VFA Production in Cow Rumen.

Authors:  Lijun Wang; Guangning Zhang; Yang Li; Yonggen Zhang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Diet Transition from High-Forage to High-Concentrate Alters Rumen Bacterial Community Composition, Epithelial Transcriptomes and Ruminal Fermentation Parameters in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Sonny C Ramos; Chang Dae Jeong; Lovelia L Mamuad; Seon Ho Kim; Seung Ha Kang; Eun Tae Kim; Yong Il Cho; Sung Sill Lee; Sang Suk Lee
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  The Multifunctional Sactipeptide Ruminococcin C1 Displays Potent Antibacterial Activity In Vivo as Well as Other Beneficial Properties for Human Health.

Authors:  Clarisse Roblin; Steve Chiumento; Cédric Jacqueline; Eric Pinloche; Cendrine Nicoletti; Hamza Olleik; Elise Courvoisier-Dezord; Agnès Amouric; Christian Basset; Louis Dru; Marie Ollivier; Aurélie Bogey-Lambert; Nicolas Vidal; Mohamed Atta; Marc Maresca; Estelle Devillard; Victor Duarte; Josette Perrier; Mickael Lafond
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.