Literature DB >> 26020296

Effects of group housing on sow welfare: a review.

M Verdon, C F Hansen, J-L Rault, E Jongman, L U Hansen, K Plush, P H Hemsworth.   

Abstract

Factors that have been shown to impact the welfare of group-housed sows are discussed in this review. Floor space allowance markedly affects sow welfare. In addition to quantity of floor space, the quality of space is important: spatial separation between sows can be provided with visual or physical barriers and stalls. Whereas 1.4 m/sow is insufficient, further research is required to examine space effects in the range of 1.8 to 2.4 m/sow in more detail. The period immediately after mixing has the most pronounced effects on aggression and stress, and therefore, well-designed mixing pens offer the opportunity to reduce aggression, injury, and stress while allowing the social hierarchy to quickly form. Because hunger is likely to lead to competition for feed or access to feeding areas, strategies to reduce hunger between meals through higher feeding levels, dietary fiber, or foraging substrate should be examined. However, feeding systems, such as full-body feeding stalls, can also affect aggression and stress by providing protection at feeding, but deriving conclusions on this topic is difficult because research directly comparing floor feeding, feeding stalls, and electronic sow feeder systems has not been conducted. Familiar sows engage in less aggression, so mixing sows that have been housed together in the previous gestation may reduce aggression. Although there is evidence in other species that early experience may affect social skills later in life, there are few studies on the effects of early "socialization" on aggressive behavior of adult sows. Genetic selection has the potential to reduce aggression, and therefore, continued research on the opportunity to genetically select against aggressiveness and its broader implications is required. Most research to date has examined mixing sows after insemination and knowledge on grouping after weaning is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26020296     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  16 in total

1.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

2.  Behavioral changes of sows with changes in flattening rate.

Authors:  Ka-Young Yang; Dong-Hwa Jang; Kyeong-Seok Kwon; Taehwan Ha; Jong-Bok Kim; Jae Jung Ha; Jun-Yeob Lee; Jung Kon Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Minimal floor space allowance for gestating sows kept in pens with electronic sow feeders on fully slatted floors.

Authors:  Yuzhi Z Li; Shiquan Q Cui; Xiaojian J Yang; Lee J Johnston; Samuel K Baidoo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Social status and previous experience in the group as predictors of welfare of sows housed in large semi-static groups.

Authors:  Sophie Brajon; Jamie Ahloy-Dallaire; Nicolas Devillers; Frédéric Guay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Floor Feeding Sows Their Daily Allocation over Multiple Drops per Day Does Not Result in More Equitable Feeding Opportunities in Later Drops.

Authors:  Megan Verdon; Natalia Zegarra; Rutu Achayra; Paul H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Improving behavior characteristics and stress indices of gestating sows housed with group housing facility.

Authors:  Yongdae Jeong; Yohan Choi; Doowan Kim; Joeun Kim; Yejin Min; Hyunjung Jung; Younghwa Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-30

Review 7.  Management and Feeding Strategies in Early Life to Increase Piglet Performance and Welfare around Weaning: A Review.

Authors:  Laia Blavi; David Solà-Oriol; Pol Llonch; Sergi López-Vergé; Susana María Martín-Orúe; José Francisco Pérez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  Causes, consequences and biomarkers of stress in swine: an update.

Authors:  Silvia Martínez-Miró; Fernando Tecles; Marina Ramón; Damián Escribano; Fuensanta Hernández; Josefa Madrid; Juan Orengo; Silvia Martínez-Subiela; Xavier Manteca; José Joaquín Cerón
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  High-performing farms exploit reproductive potential of high and low prolific sows better than low-performing farms.

Authors:  Satomi Tani; Carlos Piñeiro; Yuzo Koketsu
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-07-16

10.  Mixing Sows into Alternative Lactation Housing Affects Sow Aggression at Mixing, Future Reproduction and Piglet Injury, with Marked Differences between Multisuckle and Sow Separation Systems.

Authors:  Emma C Greenwood; Jonathon van Dissel; Jessica Rayner; Paul E Hughes; William H E J van Wettere
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.