Literature DB >> 26020171

Estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values across challenged environments to select for robust pigs.

J M Herrero-Medrano, P K Mathur, J ten Napel, H Rashidi, P Alexandri, E F Knol, H A Mulder.   

Abstract

Robustness is an important issue in the pig production industry. Since pigs from international breeding organizations have to withstand a variety of environmental challenges, selection of pigs with the inherent ability to sustain their productivity in diverse environments may be an economically feasible approach in the livestock industry. The objective of this study was to estimate genetic parameters and breeding values across different levels of environmental challenge load. The challenge load (CL) was estimated as the reduction in reproductive performance during different weeks of a year using 925,711 farrowing records from farms distributed worldwide. A wide range of levels of challenge, from favorable to unfavorable environments, was observed among farms with high CL values being associated with confirmed situations of unfavorable environment. Genetic parameters and breeding values were estimated in high- and low-challenge environments using a bivariate analysis, as well as across increasing levels of challenge with a random regression model using Legendre polynomials. Although heritability estimates of number of pigs born alive were slightly higher in environments with extreme CL than in those with intermediate levels of CL, the heritabilities of number of piglet losses increased progressively as CL increased. Genetic correlations among environments with different levels of CL suggest that selection in environments with extremes of low or high CL would result in low response to selection. Therefore, selection programs of breeding organizations that are commonly conducted under favorable environments could have low response to selection in commercial farms that have unfavorable environmental conditions. Sows that had experienced high levels of challenge at least once during their productive life were ranked according to their EBV. The selection of pigs using EBV ignoring environmental challenges or on the basis of records from only favorable environments resulted in a sharp decline in productivity as the level of challenge increased. In contrast, selection using the random regression approach resulted in limited change in productivity with increasing levels of challenge. Hence, we demonstrate that the use of a quantitative measure of environmental CL and a random regression approach can be comprehensively combined for genetic selection of pigs with enhanced ability to maintain high productivity in harsh environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26020171     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

1.  Quantifying the health challenges in an Australian piggery using medication records for the definition of disease resilience1.

Authors:  Sarita Z Y Guy; Li Li; Peter C Thomson; Susanne Hermesch
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of nursery feeding program on serum haptoglobin, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of pigs reared on commercial farms.

Authors:  Heather Reinhardt; Anna K Shoveller; Abdolvahab Farzan; Brian McBride; Lee-Anne Huber; Cornelis F M de Lange
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Genotype by feed interaction for feed efficiency and growth performance traits in pigs.

Authors:  R M Godinho; J W M Bastiaansen; C A Sevillano; F F Silva; S E F Guimarães; R Bergsma
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Genomic Selection Improves Response to Selection in Resilience by Exploiting Genotype by Environment Interactions.

Authors:  Han A Mulder
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Thermal sensitivity of growth indicates heritable variation in 1-year-old rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Authors:  Matti Janhunen; Juha Koskela; Nguyễn Hữu Ninh; Harri Vehviläinen; Heikki Koskinen; Antti Nousiainen; Ngô Phú Thỏa
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Use of multi-trait and random regression models to identify genetic variation in tolerance to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Graham Lough; Hamed Rashidi; Ilias Kyriazakis; Jack C M Dekkers; Andrew Hess; Melanie Hess; Nader Deeb; Antti Kause; Joan K Lunney; Raymond R R Rowland; Han A Mulder; Andrea Doeschl-Wilson
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Opportunities to Improve Resilience in Animal Breeding Programs.

Authors:  Tom V L Berghof; Marieke Poppe; Han A Mulder
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Genetic analysis of reproductive performance in sows during porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) and porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) outbreaks.

Authors:  Cassandra L Scanlan; Austin M Putz; Kent A Gray; Nick V L Serão
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-01

9.  Revealing new candidate genes for reproductive traits in pigs: combining Bayesian GWAS and functional pathways.

Authors:  Lucas L Verardo; Fabyano F Silva; Marcos S Lopes; Ole Madsen; John W M Bastiaansen; Egbert F Knol; Mathew Kelly; Luis Varona; Paulo S Lopes; Simone E F Guimarães
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Genetic Parameters for Resistance to Non-specific Diseases and Production Traits Measured in Challenging and Selection Environments; Application to a Rabbit Case.

Authors:  Mélanie Gunia; Ingrid David; Jacques Hurtaud; Mickaël Maupin; Hélène Gilbert; Hervé Garreau
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.