Literature DB >> 26019456

Needle-knife fistulotomy vs double-guidewire technique in patients with repetitive unintentional pancreatic cannulations.

Su Jin Kim1, Dae Hwan Kang1, Hyung Wook Kim1, Cheol Woong Choi1, Su Bum Park1, Byeong Jun Song1, Young Mi Hong1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the success rates and adverse events of early needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF) and double-guidewire technique (DGT) in patients with repetitive unintentional pancreatic cannulations.
METHODS: From a total of 1650 patients admitted for diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at a single tertiary care hospital (Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea) between January 2009 and December 2012, 134 (8.1%) patients with unsuccessful biliary cannulation after 5 min trial of conventional methods, together with 5 or more repetitive unintentional pancreatic cannulations, were enrolled in the study. Early NKF and DGT groups were assigned 67 patients each. In the DGT group, NKF was performed for an additional 7 min if successful cannulation was not achieved.
RESULTS: The success rates with early NKF and the DGT were 79.1% (53/67) and 44.8% (30/67) (P < 0.001), respectively. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was lower in the early NKF group than in the DGT group [4.5% (3/67) vs 14.9% (10/67), P = 0.041]. The mean cannulation times in the early NKF and DGT groups after assignment were 257 s and 312 s (P = 0.013), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that early NKF should be considered as the first approach to selective biliary cannulation in patients with repetitive unintentional pancreatic cannulations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cannulation; Double guidewire technique; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Needle knife fistulotomy; Pancreatitis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26019456      PMCID: PMC4438026          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  32 in total

1.  Prophylactic temporary 3F pancreatic duct stent to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with a difficult biliary cannulation: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Lee; Jong Ho Moon; Hyun Jong Choi; Seung Hyo Han; Young Koog Cheon; Young Deok Cho; Sang-Heum Park; Sun-Joo Kim
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: core technique and recent innovations.

Authors:  M J Bourke; G Costamagna; M L Freeman
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Use of a pancreatic duct stent or guidewire facilitates bile duct access with low rates of precut sphincterotomy: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Gregory A Coté; Daniel K Mullady; Sreenivasa S Jonnalagadda; Rajesh N Keswani; Sachin B Wani; Christine E Hovis; Tarek Ammar; Abed Al-Lehibi; Steven A Edmundowicz; Sri Komanduri; Riad R Azar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Abhishek Choudhary; Matthew L Bechtold; Murtaza Arif; Nicholas M Szary; Srinivas R Puli; Mohamed O Othman; Wilson P Pais; Mainor R Antillon; Praveen K Roy
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Papillary roof incision using the Erlangen-type pre-cut papillotome to achieve selective bile duct cannulation.

Authors:  K F Binmoeller; H Seifert; H Gerke; U Seitz; M Portis; N Soehendra
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Early use of needle-knife fistulotomy is safe in situations where difficult biliary cannulation is expected.

Authors:  Jun Uk Lim; Kwang Ro Joo; Jae Myung Cha; Hyun Phil Shin; Joung Il Lee; Jae Jun Park; Jung Won Jeon; Bum-Soo Kim; Sunhyung Joo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Precut sphincterotomy: a reliable salvage for difficult biliary cannulation.

Authors:  Ulku Saritas; Yucel Ustundag; Ferda Harmandar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Double guidewire technique vs transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation.

Authors:  Young Wook Yoo; Sang-Woo Cha; Woong Cheul Lee; Sae Hee Kim; Anna Kim; Young Deok Cho
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Pancreatic stent insertion: consequences of failure and results of a modified technique to maximize success.

Authors:  Martin L Freeman; Carol Overby; Dongfeng Qi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 10.  Effect of precut sphincterotomy on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abhishek Choudhary; Jessica Winn; Sameer Siddique; Murtaza Arif; Zainab Arif; Ghassan M Hammoud; Srinivas R Puli; Jamal A Ibdah; Matthew L Bechtold
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  2 in total

1.  Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Risk factors and predictors of severity.

Authors:  Ayman El Nakeeb; Ehab El Hanafy; Tarek Salah; Ehab Atef; Hosam Hamed; Ahmad M Sultan; Emad Hamdy; Mohamed Said; Ahmed A El Geidie; Tharwat Kandil; Mohamed El Shobari; Gamal El Ebidy
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-11-16

2.  A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Feasibility Trial of Double-guidewire Techniques for Difficult Biliary Cannulation Comparing a New Double-guidewire-supported Sphincterotome (MagicTome) to a Conventional Device.

Authors:  Tomoya Ogawa; Shomei Ryozawa; Atsushi Irisawa; Atsuhiro Masuda; Yuki Tanisaka; Akashi Fujita; Masafumi Mizuide; Akane Yamabe; Goro Shibukawa; Arata Sakai; Hideyuki Shiomi; Hayato Yoshinaka; Yoshihiro Okabe; Yoshifumi Arisaka; Hiromu Kutsumi
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 1.271

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.