OBJECTIVES: Staging models for medical diseases are widely used to guide treatment and prognosis. Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic condition and it is among the most disabling disorders in medicine. The staging model proposed by Kapczinski in 2009 presents four progressive clinical stages of BD. Our aim was to evaluate pharmacological maintenance treatment across these stages in patients with BD. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine subjects who met DSM-IV criteria for BD were recruited from the Bipolar Disorders Program at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. All patients were in remission. The subjects were classified according to the staging model: 31 subjects were classified as stage I, 44 as stage II, 31 as stage III, and 23 as stage IV. RESULTS: Patterns of pharmacological treatment differed among the four stages (p = 0.001). Monotherapy was more frequent in stage I, and two-drug combinations in stage II. Patients at stages III and IV needed three or more medications or clozapine. Impairment in functional status (Functioning Assessment Short Test [FAST] scale scores) correlated positively with the number of medications prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated differences in pharmacological treatment in patients with stable BD depending on disease stage. Treatment response can change with progression of BD. Clinical guidelines could consider the staging model to guide treatment effectiveness.
OBJECTIVES: Staging models for medical diseases are widely used to guide treatment and prognosis. Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic condition and it is among the most disabling disorders in medicine. The staging model proposed by Kapczinski in 2009 presents four progressive clinical stages of BD. Our aim was to evaluate pharmacological maintenance treatment across these stages in patients with BD. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine subjects who met DSM-IV criteria for BD were recruited from the Bipolar Disorders Program at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. All patients were in remission. The subjects were classified according to the staging model: 31 subjects were classified as stage I, 44 as stage II, 31 as stage III, and 23 as stage IV. RESULTS: Patterns of pharmacological treatment differed among the four stages (p = 0.001). Monotherapy was more frequent in stage I, and two-drug combinations in stage II. Patients at stages III and IV needed three or more medications or clozapine. Impairment in functional status (Functioning Assessment Short Test [FAST] scale scores) correlated positively with the number of medications prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated differences in pharmacological treatment in patients with stable BD depending on disease stage. Treatment response can change with progression of BD. Clinical guidelines could consider the staging model to guide treatment effectiveness.
Authors: Michael Berk; Robert Post; Aswin Ratheesh; Emma Gliddon; Ajeet Singh; Eduard Vieta; Andre F Carvalho; Melanie M Ashton; Lesley Berk; Susan M Cotton; Patrick D McGorry; Brisa S Fernandes; Lakshmi N Yatham; Seetal Dodd Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Roger S McIntyre; Martin Alda; Ross J Baldessarini; Michael Bauer; Michael Berk; Christoph U Correll; Andrea Fagiolini; Kostas Fountoulakis; Mark A Frye; Heinz Grunze; Lars V Kessing; David J Miklowitz; Gordon Parker; Robert M Post; Alan C Swann; Trisha Suppes; Eduard Vieta; Allan Young; Mario Maj Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 79.683
Authors: Marta H Costa; Mauricio Kunz; Andrew A Nierenberg; Thilo Deckersbach; Michael Berk; Pedro V S Magalhaes Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Afra van der Markt; Ursula Mh Klumpers; Stasja Draisma; Annemiek Dols; Willem A Nolen; Robert M Post; Lori L Altshuler; Mark A Frye; Heinz Grunze; Paul E Keck; Susan L McElroy; Trisha Suppes; Aartjan Tf Beekman; Ralph W Kupka Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Lorena de la Fuente-Tomas; Belen Arranz; Gemma Safont; Pilar Sierra; Monica Sanchez-Autet; Ana Garcia-Blanco; Maria P Garcia-Portilla Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Afra van der Markt; Ursula M H Klumpers; Annemiek Dols; Stasja Draisma; Marco P Boks; Annet van Bergen; Roel A Ophoff; Aartjan T F Beekman; Ralph W Kupka Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 6.744