| Literature DB >> 26018308 |
Kássio Sousa1, Carlos Vieira Andrade-Junior2, Juliana Melo da Silva3, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte4, Gustavo De-Deus5, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da Silva5.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The search for new instruments to promote an appropriate cervical preparation has led to the development of new rotary instruments such as TripleGates. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no study evaluating TripleGates effect on the "risk zone" of mandibular molars.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26018308 PMCID: PMC4428461 DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720130542
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Oral Sci ISSN: 1678-7757 Impact factor: 2.698
Figure 1Scanning electron microscope photomicrograph (X10) showing the TripleGates instrument
Figure 2A) Example of a preoperative image in the Gates-Glidden group; B) Postoperative image in Gates-Glidden group; C) Example of a preoperative image in TripleGates group; D) Postoperative image in TripleGates group
Mean and standard deviation (SD) of the canal area increase in percentages after the use of the tested instruments
| Group | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
| Gates-Glidden | 52.8±31.7A |
| TripleGates | 44.8±28.8A |
Same letters represent no statistically significant difference (p<0.05)
Means (mm) and standard deviation (SD) of dentin wall thickness on the initial and postinstrumentation images and percentage reduction in each group at the mesial and distal aspects of the root canal
| Images | Gates-Glidden | TripleGates | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesial | Distal | Mesial | Distal | |
| Initial | 1.35±0.17 mm | 1.11±0.16 mm | 1.32±0.17 mm | 1.09±0.15 mm |
| Final | 1.15±0.16 mm | 0.65±0.19 mm | 1.10±0.18 mm | 0.60±0.18 mm |
| Reduction (%) | 14.22±3.2%A | 42.50±6.7%B | 16.71±4.5%A | 45.00±8.3%B |
Different letters indicate statistical significant differences between the percentage of wear of the mesial and distal wall provided by the instruments tested (p<0.05).