Literature DB >> 26018306

The effects of frenotomy on breastfeeding.

Roberta Lopes de Castro Martinelli1, Irene Queiroz Marchesan2, Reinaldo Jordão Gusmão3, Heitor Marques Honório4, Giédre Berretin-Felix5.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Although the interference of tongue-tie with breastfeeding is a controversial subject, The use of lingual frenotomy has been widely indicated by health professionals.
OBJECTIVE: To observe changes in breastfeeding patterns after lingual frenotomy concerning the number of sucks, pause length between groups of sucking and mother's complaints.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Oral yes/no questions about breastfeeding symptoms and sucking/swallowing/breathing coordination were answered by the mothers of 109, 30 day old infants. On the same day the infants had their lingual frenulum assessed by administering a lingual frenulum protocol. After the assessment, all tongue-tied infants were referred for frenotomy; nevertheless, only 14 underwent the surgery. Of the 109 infants, 14 infants who did not have frenulum alterations were included as controls. Birth order and gender were the criteria for recruiting the control group. The tongue-tied infants underwent lingual frenotomy at 45 days of age. At the conclusion of the frenotomy, the infants were breastfed. At 75 days old, both groups--control and post-frenotomy--were reassessed. Before the reassessment the same oral yes/no questions were answered by the mothers of the 14 infants who underwent frenotomy. The mothers of the control group answered the questionnaire only at the time of the first assessment. Data were subjected to statistical analysis.
RESULTS: After frenotomy, the number of sucks increased and the pause length between sucking decreased during breastfeeding. The controls maintained the same patterns observed in the first assessment. From the questionnaire answered by the mothers of the 14 tongue-tied infants, at 30 days and 75 days, we observed that the symptoms concerning breastfeeding and sucking/swallowing/breathing coordination were improved after lingual frenotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: After lingual frenotomy, changes were observed in the breastfeeding patterns of the the tongue-tied infants while the control group maintained the same patterns. Moreover, all symptoms reported by the mothers of the tongue-tied infants had improved after frenotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26018306      PMCID: PMC4428459          DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720140339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci        ISSN: 1678-7757            Impact factor:   2.698


INTRODUCTION

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that mothers exclusively breastfeed for the first 6 months of the child’s life. The benefits of breastfeeding have been reported and the causes of precipitated weaning have been widely studied. Although lingual frenulum alteration (tongue-tie) has been considered as one of the causes for breastfeeding difficulties, it is a subject of much controversy among various healthcare professionals , - , .Tongue-tie occurs when a common minor embryologic tissue remnant causes restrictions in the normal movement of the tongue . Breastfeeding difficulties due to tongue-tie include ineffective latching, inadequate milk transfer and maternal nipple pain. According to several studies, lingual frenotomy is suggested when these complaints are reported , - , . Benefits after frenotomy such as better latching, maternal nipple pain reduction, and maintenance of breastfeeding practices have been reported , - , . Nevertheless, studies on the physiological aspects of sucking and on pause length between groups of sucking before and after lingual frenotomy were not found in the literature. Two hypotheses are formulated: 1) lingual frenotomy improves the patterns of sucking and breastfeeding in infants with tongue-tie; 2) symptoms during breastfeeding reported by mothers decreased after lingual frenotomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study design

This was a prospective longitudinal study conducted with infants to observe changes in breastfeeding patterns after lingual frenotomy concerning the following items: number of sucks, pause length between groups of sucking and complaints from mothers.

Subjects

109 infants born at the Santa Therezinha Hospital in Brotas – São Paulo, Brazil from January to May 2011 had their lingual frenulum assessed by a speech-language pathologist from a public health care service in Brotas. After the assessment, all tongue-tied infants were referred for frenotomy; however, only 14 – 10 males and 4 females – underwent the surgery. For different reasons many families decided not to have the surgery. Of the 109 infants, the 14 infants– 10 males and 4 females – that did not have any lingual frenulum alteration were included as controls. Birth order and gender were the criteria for recruiting the control group. All infants were being breastfed. All infants were first assessed at 30 days old and then reassessed at 75 days old. Perinatal complications, craniofacial anomalies and visible genetic syndromes were the exclusion criteria. An informed consent form was given to the parents prior to frenotomy and they were made aware of the how the procedure would be carried out. The research was approved by CEFAC’s Ethics Committee (019/10).

Evaluation and intervention procedures

Previous to assessment, oral yes/no questions about breastfeeding symptoms and sucking/swallowing/breathing coordination were answered by the mothers of 109 infants at 30 days old. On the same day the infants had their lingual frenulum assessed by administering the lingual frenulum protocol proposed by Martinelli, Marchesan and Berretin-Felix , (2012,2013) before and during breastfeeding. The protocol consists of a clinical history evaluation, anatomo-functional evaluation and non-nutritive and nutritive sucking evaluations. This study considered the assessment of the number of sucks in each one of the three first groups of sucking. One group of sucking consists of a number of sucks in a row followed by pause. The average of sucks of the three first groups of sucking was calculated. Pause lengths between groups of sucking were calculated in seconds using a chronometer and the average pause length between the three first groups of sucking was calculated. The result of the assessment indicated the infants with and without lingual frenulum alteration. After the assessment, all tongue-tied infants were referred for frenotomy; nevertheless, only 14 underwent the surgery. The tongue-tied infants underwent lingual frenotomy at 45 days of age. All surgeries were performed by an otorhinolaryngologist, who decided to perform the procedures with a topical anesthetic. The infant’s tongue was lifted upwards with a grooved director. Sterile scissors were used to release the lingual frenulum. Suture was not necessary. At the conclusion of the procedure, the infants were immediately breastfed. At 75 days of age, both groups – control and post-frenotomy – were reassessed. Before the reassessment the same oral yes/no questions were answered by the mothers of the 14 infants who underwent frenotomy. The mothers of the control group answered the questionnaire only during the first assessment. The questionnaire contained the following questions: a) Is time between feedings less than one hour? b) Does the infant sleep less than 2 hours between feedings? c) Does the infant alternate between sucking and sleeping during breastfeeding? d) Does the infant feel tired during breastfeeding? e) Does the infant suck a little and then stop for a long rest period? f) Does the infant chew on the nipple during breastfeeding? g) Does the infant have a strong suck? h) Does the infant frequently make tongue clicking noises during breastfeeding? i) Does the infant slip off of the nipple during breastfeeding? j) Do you have nipple pain during breastfeeding? k) Does the infant frequently make sounds while swallowing the milk during breastfeeding? l) Does the infant frequently choke during breastfeeding? m) Does the infant frequently get hiccups immediately after breastfeeding? n) Does the infant frequently cough during breastfeeding? o) Does the infant frequently regurgitate immediately after breastfeeding?

Statistical analysis

The quantitative data was subjected to statistical analysis using the Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance test followed by Tukey test – which is a multiple comparison test – considering group factor as an independent variable and time (first and second evaluation) as a dependent variable. The qualitative data had a descriptive analysis. The data’s statistical analysis had a significance level of 5% (p<0.05).

RESULTS

After lingual frenotomy, the number of sucks increased and the pause length between sucking groups decreased during breastfeeding as shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Average values of the measurement related to the number of sucks and length of pauses during breast feeding for both groups: infants with and without lingual frenulum alteration (tongue-tie)

 Group with tongue-tieControl groupStatistical analysis (≠ between groups)
The average number of sucks in each one of the three first groups of sucking before sugery   
Average at 30 days of age19.36±13.0255.76±21.00p=0.005*
The average number of sucks in each one of the three first groups of sucking after surgery   
Average at 75 days of age53.76±7.9954.50±20.88p>0.05
Statistical analysis (≠ between moments)p<0.001*p>0.05 
Pause length measurement before surgery calculeted in seconds   
Average at 30 days of age6.14±2.473.00±0.63p<0.001*
Pause length measurement after surgery calculated in seconds   
Average at 75 days3.88±0.883.30±0.67p>0.05
Statistical analysis (≠ between moments)p=0.013*p>0.05 

*statistically significant difference

*statistically significant difference From the questionnaire answered by the mothers of the 14 tongue-tied infants, at 30 days and 75 days, we observed that the symptoms concerning breastfeeding and sucking/swallowing/breathing coordination were improved after the lingual frenotomy as shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Questionnaire answers: percentage of symptoms reported by the mothers of the 28 infants

SYMPTOMSControl GroupGroup with lingual frenulum alteration
 Initial QInitial QFinal Q
 % Yes% Yes% Yes
BREASTFEEDING   
Is time between feedings less than one hour?092,850
Does the infant sleep less than 2 hours between feedings?085.710
Does the infant alternate between sucking and sleeping during breastfeeding?064.280
Does the infant feel tired during breastfeeding?01000
Does the infant suck a little and then stop a long time for resting?01000
Does the infant chew the nipple during breastfeeding?7.14500
Does the infant have a strong suck?35.7185.710
Does the infant frequently click the tongue during breastfeeding?14.2964.280
Does the infant slip off the nipple during breastfeeding?071.420
Do you have nipple pain during breastfeeding?21.4342.850
SUCKING/SWALLOWING/BREATHING COORDINATION
Does the infant frequently make sounds while swallowing the milk during breastfeeding?21.43500
Does the infant frequently choke during breastfeeding?28.5757.140
Does the infant frequently get hiccups immediately after breastfeeding?21.43507.14
Does the infant frequently cough during breastfeeding?07.140
Does the infant frequently regurgitate immediately after breastfeeding?21.4314.280

Initial Q=Initial Questionnaire; Final Q=Final Questionnaire

Initial Q=Initial Questionnaire; Final Q=Final Questionnaire Before lingual frenotomy, the main symptoms reported were: fatigue during breastfeeding, long pauses between sucks for resting, short time between feedings (less than one hour), strong sucks, and less than two-hours of sleep between feedings. Other symptoms also reported were: slipping off the nipple, chewing on the nipple, hiccups, sounds during breastfeeding, nipple pain, regurgitation and coughing. After lingual frenotomy, the only symptom reported by one of the mothers was hiccups. The other symptoms reported by the mothers before frenotomy were absent after frenotomy as shown in Table 2. The controls maintained the same breastfeeding patterns observed in the first assessment.

DISCUSSION

Although the interference of alterations to the lingual frenulum with breastfeeding is a subject of controversy, lingual frenotomy has been widely indicated by healthcare professionals, mainly due to government breastfeeding campaigns - , , . Various prospective cohort studies and randomized trials were published in the last 15 years, reporting nipple pain and breastfeeding difficulties , , , . Despite the importance of breastfeeding, studies correlating tongue-tie to the number of sucks and pause length between sucking groups after frenotomy were not found in the literature. The findings of this study clearly demonstrated improvements in sucking after lingual frenotomy, and confirmed the importance of administering a lingual frenulum evaluation protocol for early frenotomy indication. Better latching and breastfeeding quality as well as increasing the time between feedings after frenotomy have been reported in the literature - . Those findings may be explained by the fact that after lingual frenotomy, the movements of the tongue are released; consequently, the number of sucks increased and the pause length between sucking groups decreased. The results of this study, shown in Table 1, are in agreement with the literature , - . Moreover, the literature reports that independently of the frenulum, ineffective latching may be caused by characteristics of the nipple . Before frenotomy the mothers of the tongue-tied infants had reported a short time between feedings – less than 1 hour – reduced feeding time, infant fatigue during breastfeeding, and inefficient milk transfer and sleep, which caused stress for both the mother and the infant. The improvement of the symptoms reported by mothers after the surgery confirmed the positive results of the lingual frenotomy. Although mothers were aware of the procedure, thus introducing a significant bias, the results demonstrated were in agreement with literature . Moreover, those findings are in agreement with the reports stating that breastfeeding difficulties diminish after lingual frenotomy - , , , , - . By administering the existing lingual frenulum assessment protocols found in literature , - , speech-sanguage pathologists, mainly orofacial motricity/dysphagia specialists, should be able to assess and diagnose tongue-tie interfering with breastfeeding in order to avoid precipitated weaning. Breastfeeding is a key aspect of maternal, newborn and child health because it provides all the nutrients and antibodies required for healthy development. Moreover, breastfeeding is also beneficial for the emotional connection between mother and child .

CONCLUSIONS

After lingual frenotomy, the tongue-tied infants displayed changes in breastfeeding patterns – the number of sucks increased and the pause length between groups of sucking decreased – while the control group maintained the same breastfeeding patterns. Moreover, all symptoms reported by the mothers of tongue-tied infants were improved after lingual frenotomy.
  12 in total

1.  A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of tongue-tie division and its immediate effect on breastfeeding.

Authors:  Janet Berry; Mervyn Griffiths; Carolyn Westcott
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Randomized, controlled trial of division of tongue-tie in infants with feeding problems.

Authors:  Monica Hogan; Carolyn Westcott; Mervyn Griffiths
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.954

3.  Ankyloglossia: assessment, incidence, and effect of frenuloplasty on the breastfeeding dyad.

Authors:  Jeanne L Ballard; Christine E Auer; Jane C Khoury
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Lingual frenulum protocol with scores for infants.

Authors:  Roberta Lopes de Castro Martinelli; Irene Queiroz Marchesan; Giédre Berretin-Felix
Journal:  Int J Orofacial Myology       Date:  2012-11

Review 5.  Fifteen-minute consultation: the infant with a tongue tie.

Authors:  Douglas M Bowley; G Suren Arul
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 1.309

6.  Efficacy of neonatal release of ankyloglossia: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Melissa Buryk; David Bloom; Timothy Shope
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 7.  Tongue-tie and breastfeeding: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Janet Edmunds; Sandra C Miles; Paul Fulbrook
Journal:  Breastfeed Rev       Date:  2011-03

Review 8.  Clinical inquiries. When should you treat tongue-tie in a newborn?

Authors:  Anthony Cho; Gary Kelsberg; Sarah Safranek
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  Benefits of frenulotomy in infants with ankyloglossia.

Authors:  Neeraj Sethi; Dominique Smith; Sahr Kortequee; Victoria M M Ward; Susan Clarke
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.675

10.  The effects of office-based frenotomy for anterior and posterior ankyloglossia on breastfeeding.

Authors:  Cliff O'Callahan; Susan Macary; Stephanie Clemente
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 1.675

View more
  5 in total

1.  Double lingual frenulum: a case report.

Authors:  Reham O Filfilan; Soulafa A Almazrooa
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-26

2.  Surface Electromyographic Analysis of the Suprahyoid Muscles in Infants Based on Lingual Frenulum Attachment during Breastfeeding.

Authors:  Ellia Christinne Lima França; Lucas Carvalho Aragão Albuquerque; Roberta Lopes Castro Martinelli; Ilda Machado Fiuza Gonçalves; Cejana Baiocchi Souza; Maria Alves Barbosa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Effect of Lingual Frenotomy on Tongue and Lip Rest Position: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Roberta Lopes Castro Martinelli; Irene Queiroz Marchesan; Reinaldo Jordão Gusmão; Giédre Berretin-Felix
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-05

4.  Lingual laser frenotomy in newborns with ankyloglossia: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fabio Dell'Olio; Maria Elisabetta Baldassarre; Fabio Giovanni Russo; Federico Schettini; Rosaria Arianna Siciliani; Pietro Paolo Mezzapesa; Angela Tempesta; Nicola Laforgia; Gianfranco Favia; Luisa Limongelli
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  Management of Ankyloglossia and Breastfeeding Difficulties in the Newborn: Breastfeeding Sessions, Myofunctional Therapy, and Frenotomy.

Authors:  Elvira Ferrés-Amat; Tomasa Pastor-Vera; Paula Rodríguez-Alessi; Eduard Ferrés-Amat; Javier Mareque-Bueno; Eduard Ferrés-Padró
Journal:  Case Rep Pediatr       Date:  2016-08-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.