| Literature DB >> 26018014 |
Pierpaolo Petrone1, Massimo Niola2, Pierpaolo Di Lorenzo2, Mariano Paternoster2, Vincenzo Graziano2, Giuseppe Quaremba3, Claudio Buccelli2.
Abstract
Here we describe the findings of a unique example of the early techniques adopted in neurosurgery around 5000 years ago, consisting in a double well healed skull trephination associated with a post-cranial traumatic event occurring intra vitam to a young male from the Early Chalcolithic cemetery of Pontecagnano (South Italy, ca. 4,900 - 4,500 cal BP). Morphological, X-ray and 3D-CT scan skull-cap evaluation revealed that the main orifice was produced by scraping, obtained by clockwise rotary motion of a right-handed surgeon facing the patient, while the partial trephination was carried out by using a stone point as a drilling tool. In both cases, bone regrowth is indicative of the individual's prolonged postoperative survival and his near-complete recovery. The right femur shows a poorly healed mid-shaft fracture presumably induced by a high energy injury, and a resulting chronic osteomyelitis, affecting both femurs by hematogenous spread of the infection. Our observations on the visual and radiological features of skull and femur lesions, along with evidence on the timing of experimental bone regrowth vs. healing of lower limb fractures associated to long-term bone infections now suggest that this young man underwent a double skull trephination in order to alleviate his extremely painful condition induced by chronic osteomyelitis, which is thought to have been the cause of death.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26018014 PMCID: PMC4445912 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124790
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Cases of cranial trephination in the protohistory of the Italian peninsula.
| Site | Period | Sex/age | Description | Technique | Survival | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abruzzi | Neolithic | ♀ / Adult | Double: a. Ellipsoid / Left parietal | Scr, P-T | L-term | 1 |
| b. Rounded / Left parietal | Scr | L-term | ||||
| Basilicata | Neolithic | ♂ / Adult | Ellipsoid / Frontal, parietals | Inc | L-term | 2 |
| Latium | Neolithic | ♂ / Adult | Ellipsoid / Frontal, parietals | Scr + Inc | S-term | 2 |
| Campania | Copper Age | ♂ / Adult | Ovoid / Frontal, Left parietal | Scr | L-term | 3 |
| Liguria | Copper Age | ♀? / Adult | Linear incisions / Parietal | Inc, P-T | S-term | 2 |
| Latium | Copper Age | ♂ / Adult | Triple: a. Ellipsoid / Frontal | Burin | L-term | 2 |
| b. Ellipsoid / Frontal | Scr | L-term | ||||
| c. Ellipsoid / Parietal | Scr | L-term | ||||
| Tuscany | Copper Age | ♀ / Adult | Sub quadrangular / Left parietal | Scr | L-term | 2 |
| Tuscany | Copper Age | ♂ / Adult | Ellipsoid / Frontal, parietals | Scr | L-term | 2 |
| Sardinia | Copper Age | ♂ / Adult | Ellipsoid / Frontal, parietals | Scr? | L-term | 2 |
| Sardinia | Copper Age | ♂ / Adult | 1. Ellipsoid / Frontal | Scr | L-term | 2 |
| ♂ / Adult | 2. Ovoid / Occipital | Scr | L-term | |||
| Tuscany | Bronze Age | ♂ / Adult | 1. Ellipsoid / Frontal, parietals | Scr | L-term | 2 |
| ♂ / Juvenile | 2. Lanceolate / Frontal | Inc | L-term | |||
| ♂ / Adult | 3. Lanceolate / Frontal | Inc | L-term | |||
| ? / Adult | 4. Double: a. Circular /? Parietal | Scr | L-term | |||
| b. Circular /? Parietal | Burin | S-term | ||||
| ♂ / Child | 5. Linear incision / Frontal | Inc | L-term | |||
| Sardinia | Bronze Age | ♂ / Adult | 1. Circular / Lozenge | Scr | S-term | 2 |
| ♂ / Adult | 2. Double: a. Ellipsoid, rounded | Scr | S-term | |||
| b. Ellipsoid, rounded | Scr | S-term | ||||
| ♂ / Adult | 3. Double: a. Ellipsoid / Frontal | Scr | L-term | |||
| b. Lanceolate / Occipital | Scr | no | ||||
| ♂ / Adult | 4. Quadruple: a. Ellipsoid / Frontal | Burin | L-term | |||
| b. Ellipsoid / Left parietal | Burin | L-term | ||||
| c. Ellipsoid / Occipital | Burin | L-term | ||||
| d. Circular / Left parietal | Scr | L-term | ||||
| ♀ / Adult | 5. Ellipsoid / Right parietal | Scr + Inc | L-term | |||
| ♂ / Adult | 6. Triple: a. Circular / Frontal | Scr | L-term | |||
| b. Circular / Parietals | Scr | L-term | ||||
| c. Circular / Parietals | Scr | S-term | ||||
| Sicily | Bronze Age | ♂ / Adult | Ovoid / Right parietal | Scr | L-term | 2 |
| Lombardy | Bronze Age | ♀ / Adult | Ellipsoid / Frontal | Scr | L-term | 2 |
| Friuli-V.G. | Bronze Age | ♂ / Adult | Ellipsoid / Right parietal | Scr | L-term | 2 |
Scr = scraping; Inc = incision; P-T = post-traumatic; L-term = long-term; S-term = short-term;? = undefined Ref (Reference): 1 = Capasso et al. (2002); 2 = Fornaciari et al. (1993); 3 = Present article
Fig 1Plan of grave PC 6589.
Grave 6589 consists of a single funerary chamber and a pit. The last deposition (specimen 6589.1, dark gray) is positioned at the center of the chamber, while three more skeletons are shifted (secondary burial) to the north-west side. A further group of bones belong to a dog’s skeleton. Scale bar measures 1 meter (modified from Bailo Modesti et al. 1998).
Differential diagnosis for skull trephination (modified from Steinbock, 1976, Aufderheide et al., 1997, and Ortner, 2003).
| Skull lesions | Lesion features | Features of 6589.1 major skull lesion | Features of 6589.1 minor skull lesion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Oval, symmetrical lesions; irregular shape and borders. | Ellipsoidal, volcano-like shape; lesion not symmetrical. | Round, conical shape; lesion not symmetrical. |
| 2. | Sharply defined borders; asymmetric shape. | Beveled borders; symmetric shape. | Beveled borders; symmetric shape. |
| 3. | Inner table defects size exceeds outer; sharply defined borders. | Outer table defect size exceeds inner. | Defect involving the sole outer table. |
| 4. | Much more irregular; possible retaining of fracture line. | Regular; absence of fracture lines. | Regular; absence of fracture lines. |
| 5. | Irregular, often multiple, destructive; no reactive borders, erosion, osteolysis. | Regular, well defined, new bone formation; lone in its cranial district. | Regular, defined, new bone formation; lone in its cranial district. |
| 6. | Destructive. Differently from trauma, trephination and cauterization, benign tumors do not produce synostosis. | New bone formation; advanced synostosis. | New bone formation; advanced synostosis. |
| 7. | Irregular, multiple, osteolysis; extensive sclerotic healing. | Regular, well defined; new bone formation; lone in its cranial district. | Regular, defined; new bone formation; lone in its cranial district. |
| 8. | New bone response, irregular, diffuse. | Regular, well defined. | Regular, defined. |
| 9. | Depression not sharply demarcated, symmetrical; thinning of the outer table. | Regular, well defined, not symmetrical; thick outer table. | Regular, defined, not symmetrical; thick outer table. |
| 10. | Erosion by stone abrasion, acid soils, animal effects; irregular. | Regular, new bone formation; close environment (burial structure). | Regular, new bone formation; close environment (burial structure). |
| 11. | Accidental holes by sharp instruments or picks; irregular, sharp edges. | Regular, beveled borders; absence of fractures. | Regular, beveled borders; absence of fractures, intact inner table. |
Taphonomic (biological, geological, human) agents possibly involved in causing the skull lesions.
| Taphonomic agents | Bone assemblage attributes |
|---|---|
| a. position | deep (few meters) from surface |
| b. depositional unit attributes | laying on tuffaceous fine textured sediment |
| c. anatomical distribution of damage | proximal and/or distal |
| d. weathering | low, flaking of outer surface |
| e. gnawing damage | absent |
| f. polish/abrasion/corrosion | random superficial fine erosion |
| g. distortion/deformation | absent |
| h. fractures, crushing | random, mostly affecting smaller, more fragile bones |
| i. completeness | incomplete skeleton, larger bones articulated with other bones |
Fig 2Double skull trephination affecting specimen 6589.1.
Superior (A) and lateral (B) view and corresponding X-ray images of the skull-cap. Wide crater-like elliptical depression across the bregma, showing well-defined, irregular borders (A, B). Gross morphology and X-ray images show healing, new bone being more radiolucent and with less mature architecture compared with surrounding old bone. A further minor depression in located close to the lambda (arrows) (A, B). Scale bar equals 5 cm.
Fig 3Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) scan of the main skull trephination.
Frontal (A) and sagittal (B) plane CT scan. Extensive and irregular bone reconstruction is apparent. No evidence is seen of incomplete healing processes as in the case of complication by infection. Note the different angle at the top/bottom (frontal plane) (A) and front/back (sagittal plane) (B) bone around the hole, indicative of right-handed clockwise rotation applied during the action of scraping (arrows). Detail of the main lesion, whose edges show active regenerative bone processes (A1). Endocranial aspect of the lesion. The bone surrounding the hole is intact (A2). 3D reconstruction of the outer aspect of the trepanned cranial vault. The arrows show the clockwise rotation movement (C). Scale bars measure 3 cm.
Fig 4Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) scan slices of the main skull trephination.
Coronal (A) and sagittal (B) plane CT scan cross section sequence. Note the oblique orientation of the hole walls, and the defect edges remodeled into one compact bone layer, as a result of the loss of diploic structures. The smoothed, beveled edges are also indicative of bone regrowth. Scale bars measure 3 cm.
Fig 5Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) scan of the minor skull trephination.
(A, B) Sagittal plane CT scan (A). Only the external cortical layer of the bone is affected (arrow). Detail of the cone-shaped lesion, identified as an incomplete trephination with a possible ritual purpose (B). Bone remodeling, hypervascularity and pitting of the ectocranial surface suggest an advanced phase of the bone healing process. Scale bar measures 3 cm.
Fig 6Details of the femoral nonunion fracture.
Anterior (A), medial (B), posterior (C) and lateral (D) views of the middle shaft of the right femur showing a transverse simple linear fracture (arrows), characterized by unhealed margins and lack of bone callus regeneration (A-D). Wide cloaca opening, surrounded by reactive bone (D). Detail of few bone bridges (box) on the medial aspect of the lesion, indicative of poor bone repair. Scale bar equals 1 cm.
Fig 7Traumatic and osteomyelitic femoral lesions.
Latero-lateral (A) and antero-posterior (B) X-ray images, and posterior view (C) of the right femur (A, B). Diffuse periosteal new bone apposition (involucrum) testified by a more radiolucent enlarged cortical bone layer, a reduced medullary cavity, and a cloaca drainage canal, diagnostic of long-term chronic osteomyelitis (C). Abnormal size of the femoral shaft induced by periosteal new bone apposition. At the mid-shaft, the fracture line and the cloaca opening are evident (arrows). Scale bar equals 5 cm.
Fig 8Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) scan of the femoral lesion.
Posterior (A), anterior (B), and medial (C) views of the transverse simple linear fracture. New bone apposition (involucrum) is evident. The bone lesion is characterized by poor healing (arrows) (D). Detail of the cloaca opening (box) and, above, the uninterrupted fracture line. Scale bar equals 3 cm.