| Literature DB >> 26017792 |
Ali Sheikh Md Sayed1, Ke Xia1, Fei Li1, Xu Deng1, Umme Salma2, Tingbo Li3, Hai Deng1, Dafeng Yang1, Zhou Haoyang1, TianLun Yang1, Jun Peng3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Circulating microRNAs have been recognized as promising biomarkers for various diseases. The present study aimed to explore the potential roles of circulating miR-149, miR-424 and miR-765 as non-invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in middle-aged (40-60-year-old) patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26017792 PMCID: PMC4418278 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2015(04)07
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Clinical data from the study subjects.
| Age (years) | 53 (49–57) | 53 (49–57) | 54 (49–58) | 0.957 | 0.471 |
| Male/Female | 16/16 | 38/27 | 20/12 | 0.516 | 0.208 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22 (20–23) | 22 (19–25) | 23 (20–27) | 0.706 | 0.124 |
| Active Smoker (%) | 59.37 | 63.07 | 67 | 0.825 | 0.606 |
| Hypertension (%) | 56.25 | 70.76 | 73.3 | 0.177 | 0.192 |
| Dyslipidemia (%) | 37.50 | 41.53 | 43.33 | 0.826 | 0.796 |
| DM (%) | 15.63 | 20 | 23.33 | 0.783 | 0.529 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 127 (119–135) | 131 (117–146) | 134 (122–146) | 0.330 | 0.018 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 79 (72–86) | 80 (73–86) | 82 (75–90) | 0.587 | 0.076 |
| LVEF (%) | 66 (60–72) | 63 (55–71) | 62 (53–70) | 0.238 | 0.075 |
| Aspirin (%) | 34.3 | 53.84 | 60 | 0.086 | 0.074 |
| β-blocker (%) | 40.62 | 61.53 | 66.66 | 0.082 | 0.047 |
| CCB (%) | 31.25 | 38.46 | 46.66 | 0.511 | 0.298 |
| ACEI/ARB (%) | 28.12 | 35.84 | 40 | 0.502 | 0.423 |
| Statin (%) | 46.87 | 61.53 | 63.33 | 0.196 | 0.213 |
| Diuretic (%) | 18.75 | 24.61 | 26.66 | 0.612 | 0.550 |
The data are presented as the median and range. Abbreviations: UA, unstable angina; BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; CCB, calcium channel blocker; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; and ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker. p-value (non-CAD patients vs. CAD patients), p-value (non-CAD patients vs. UA patients).
Laboratory data from the study subjects.
| FBS (mmol/L) | 4.9 (4.3–5.4) | 5.1 (4.2–6.1) | 5.2 (3.9–6.7) | 0.234 | 0.490 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.5 (0.5–2.5) | 1.6 (0.6–2.7) | 1.8 (0.8–2.7) | 0.454 | 0.126 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.4 (2.9–5.9) | 4.9 (3.3–6.5) | 5.3 (3.7-7) | 0.177 | 0.038 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.9 (0.5–1.4) | 0.9 (0.4–1.4) | 0.9 (0.5–1.3) | 0.595 | 0.746 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.7 (1.5–3.8) | 2.9 (1.4–4.4) | 3.2 (2.1–4.3) | 0.872 | 0.024 |
| hs-CRP (mg/L) | 1.4 (0.5–2.7) | 19.8 (9.9–29.5) | 21.3 (15–27.5) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| AST (U/L) | 15.3 (6.9–24) | 17.7 (8.3–27.1) | 19.8 (12.6–27) | 0.294 | 0.019 |
| ALT (U/L) | 17.1 (9.1–25) | 19.1 (10.7–27.4) | 21.5 (13.4–29.6) | 0.244 | 0.042 |
| Cr (umol/L) | 71.5 (52.4–90) | 74.8 (53.4–96.1) | 79.8 (58.6–101.1) | 0.602 | 0.049 |
The data are presented as the median and range. Abbreviations: FBS, fasting blood sugar; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; and Cr, creatinine. p-value (CAD patients vs. non-CAD patients), p-value (UA patients vs. non-CAD patients).
Figure 1Plasma expression levels of miR-149, miR-424 and miR-765 in non-CAD patients, stable CAD patients and unstable CAD patients.
Figure 2Diagnostic accuracy of circulating miR-149, miR-424 and miR-765 were analyzed by ROC curve. A) ROC curve of miR-149, non-CAD patients vs. CAD. B) ROC curve of miR-149, non-CAD patients vs. unstable CAD patients. C) ROC curve of miR-149, CAD vs. unstable CAD patients. D) ROC curve of miR-424, non-CAD patients vs. CAD. E) ROC curve of miR-424, non-CAD patients vs. unstable CAD patients. F) ROC curve of miR-424, CAD vs. unstable CAD patients. G) ROC curve of miR-765, non-CAD patients vs. CAD. H) ROC curve of miR-765, non-CAD patients vs. unstable CAD patients. I) ROC curve of miR-765, CAD vs. unstable CAD patients.
Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis of miRNA ratios for predicting coronary artery disease.
| Non-CAD vs. CAD | 0.938 | 1.67 | 71.8% | 95.3% | 0.894 to 0.983 | <0.0001 |
| Non-CAD vs. UA | 0.951 | 1.71 | 75% | 96.6% | 0.905 to 0.997 | <0.0001 |
| CAD vs. UA | 0.539 | 1.15 | 75% | 40% | 0.415 to 0.663 | 0.540 |
| Non-CAD vs. CAD | 0.919 | 1.61 | 68.7% | 92.3% | 0.863 to 0.975 | <0.0001 |
| Non-CAD vs. UA | 0.960 | 1.77 | 84.3% | 93.3% | 0.920 to 1.000 | <0.0001 |
| CAD vs. UA | 0.682 | 1.35 | 89.2% | 46.6% | 0.559 to 0.805 | 0.005 |
| Non-CAD vs. CAD | 0.968 | 1.75 | 81.5% | 93.7% | 0.939 to 996 | <0.0001 |
| Non-CAD vs. UA | 0.977 | 1.80 | 83.3% | 96.8% | 0.949 to 1.005 | <0.0001 |
| CAD vs. UA | 0.760 | 1.57 | 66.5% | 90.7% | 0.635 to 0.885 | <0.0001 |
AUC, area under the curve; CAD, coronary artery disease; Non-CAD, non-coronary artery disease; UA, unstable angina (unstable coronary artery disease); 95% CI, confidence interval.