| Literature DB >> 26017391 |
Davina Derous1, Thomas Kelder, Evert M van Schothorst, Marjan van Erk, Anja Voigt, Susanne Klaus, Jaap Keijer, Marijana Radonjic.
Abstract
Health is influenced by interplay of molecular, physiological and environmental factors. To effectively maintain health and prevent disease, health-relevant relations need to be understood at multiple levels of biological complexity. Network-based methods provide a powerful platform for integration and mining of data and knowledge characterizing different aspects of health. Previously, we have reported physiological and gene expression changes associated with adaptation of murine epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT) to 5 days and 12 weeks of high-fat diet (HFD) and low-fat diet feeding (Voigt et al. in Mol Nutr Food Res 57:1423-1434, 2013. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201200671 ). In the current study, we apply network analysis on this dataset to comprehensively characterize mechanisms driving the short- and long-term adaptation of eWAT to HFD across multiple levels of complexity. We built a three-layered interaction network comprising enriched biological processes, their transcriptional regulators and associated changes in physiological parameters. The multi-layered network model reveals that early eWAT adaptation to HFD feeding involves major changes at a molecular level, including activation of TGF-β signalling pathway, immune and stress response and downregulation of mitochondrial functioning. Upon prolonged HFD intake, initial transcriptional response tails off, mitochondrial functioning is even further diminished, and in turn the relation between eWAT gene expression and physiological changes becomes more prominent. In particular, eWAT weight and total energy intake negatively correlate with cellular respiration process, revealing mitochondrial dysfunction as a hallmark of late eWAT adaptation to HFD. Apart from global understanding of the time-resolved adaptation to HFD, the multi-layered network model allows several novel mechanistic hypotheses to emerge: (1) early activation of TGF-β signalling as a trigger for structural and morphological changes in mitochondrial organization in eWAT, (2) modulation of cellular respiration as an intervention strategy to effectively deal with excess dietary fat and (3) discovery of putative intervention targets, such those in pathways related to appetite control. In conclusion, the generated network model comprehensively characterizes eWAT adaptation to high-fat diet, spanning from global aspects to mechanistic details. Being open to further exploration by the research community, it provides a resource of health-relevant interactions ready to be used in a broad range of research applications.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26017391 PMCID: PMC4446272 DOI: 10.1007/s12263-015-0470-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes Nutr ISSN: 1555-8932 Impact factor: 5.523
Fig. 1Network of biological processes after 5 days of HFD. Differentially enriched biological processes (HFD vs. LFD) after 5 days of HFD feeding are analysed using Enrichment map (Cytoscape). The nodes represent biological processes, and edges represent overlap between genes in the enriched processes. The colour of the nodes represents the significance and the direction of the expression (blue—downregulation; red—upregulation; green—both up- and downregulation). The size of the nodes corresponds to the size of the gene set. The width of edges is based on similarity coefficients between the nodes, derived from the overlap of the gene set underlying the processes. Related biological processes were grouped into seven main clusters
Fig. 2Network of biological processes after 12 weeks of HFD feeding. Similar as in Fig. 1, for timepoint 12 weeks
Fig. 3Multi-level network model of eWAT adaptation to 5 days of HFD. The three-layered network model comprising (1) biological processes, (2) transcription regulators (TFs) and (3) physiological parameters associated with eWAT gene expression after 5 days of HFD feeding. The processes layer includes differentially enriched biological processes as described in Fig. 1. The regulatory network layer includes TFs whose targets are enriched among the differentially expressed genes (HFD vs. LFD after 5 days of HFD feeding). TFs with highly overlapping target gene sets are clustered into single nodes. The physiological network layer includes parameters significantly correlated with eWAT expression data. The connections between the three layers are based on the overlap between underlying gene sets. The width of edges is based on the overlap between underlying gene sets. The colour coding of nodes is as described in Fig. 1, where for TFs, the direction of the expression of their targets is represented (red—activation, blue—repression)
Fig. 4Multi-level network model of eWAT adaptation to 12 weeks of HFD. Similar to Fig. 3, for timepoint 12 weeks. The dashed lines indicate a different use of cut-off for the overlap coefficient (see “Methods” section)
Connections between three layers (processes–transcription factors (TF)–physiological parameters) for 5 days and 12 weeks. The relationship indicates between which layers the edge occurs, and the size of overlap shows the amount of genes overlapping. Similarly, coefficient is a measurement of similarity between the two gene set of the two nodes connected by an edge
| Edge ID | Relationship | Size of overlap | Similarity coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| BM gain—HMGA1 | Physiology–TF | 1 | 0.5 |
| BM gain—OSR2 | Physiology–TF | 1 | 1 |
| ESR1—regulation_of_biological_quality | TF–processes | 3 | 0.6 |
| FANK 1—Chromosome | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| FANK1—nucleus | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| FANK1—RNA_polymerase_II_transcription_factor_activity | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| HMGA1—cytoskeletal_protein_binding | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| HMGA1—extracellular_region | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| HMGA1—kinase_regulator_activity | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| HMGA1—pattern_binding | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| HMGA1—polysaccharide_binding | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| HMGA1—signal_transduction | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| ING2—negative_regulation_of_biological_process | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| ING2—regulation_of_biological_quality | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| ING2—regulation_of_multicellular_organismal_process | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| ING2—response_to_external_stimulus | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| ING2—response_to_stress | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| ING2—response_to_wounding | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| MECOM—biopolymer_metabolic_process | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| MECOM—nucleobasenucleosidenucleotide_and_nucleic_acid_metabolic_process | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| MECOM—RNA_biosynthetic_process | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| MECOM—signal_transduction | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| MECOM—transcription | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| MTPN—regulation_of_biological_quality | TF–processes | 2 | 0.5 |
| NCOA6—negative_regulation_of_biological_process | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| NCOA6—regulation_of_biological_quality | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| NCOA6—response_to_external_stimulus | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| NCOA6—response_to_stress | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| NCOA6—response_to_wounding | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| ORS2—receptor_binding | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| OSR2—anatomical_structure_development | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| OSR2—multicellular_organismal_development | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| OSR2—signal_transduction | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| PPARD—oxidoreductase_activity | TF–processes | 2 | 0.666666667 |
| SLC2A4RG—carbohydrate_metabolic_process | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| SLC2A4RG—cell_surface | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| SLC2A4RG—integral_to_membrane | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| SLC2A4RG—membrane_part | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| SLC2A4RG—organelle_membrane | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| SLC2A4RG—plasma_membrane | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| SLC2A4RG—plasma_membrane_part | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| SLC2A4RG—regulation_of_biological_quality | TF–processes | 1 | 1 |
| TAF6—chromosome | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| TAF6—nucleus | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| TAF6—RNA_polymerase_II_transcription_factor_activity | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
| NCOA6—regulation_of_multicellular_organismal_process | TF–processes | 1 | 0.5 |
|
| 0.4 | ||
| Energy intake (KJ/D)(whole intervention period)—cellular_respiration | Physiology–processes | 6 | 0.333333333 |
| eWAT weight (g)—cellular_respiration | Physiology–processes | 5 | 0.315789474 |
| eWAT weight (g)—cofactor_biosynthetic_process | Physiology–processes | 6 | 0.388888889 |
| eWAT weight (g)—proteasome_complex | Physiology–processes | 7 | 0.5 |
| ETS2—energy intake (KJ/D)(whole intervention period) | TF–physiology | 7 | 0.571428571 |
| FOSL1—energy intake (KJ/D)(first 3 days after diet switch) | TF–physiology | 8 | 0.615384615 |
| FOXO4—eWAT weight (g) | TF–physiology | 8 | 0.583333333 |
| MLXIPL—eWAT weight (g) | TF–physiology | 7 | 0.6 |
| NCOA6—eWAT weight (g) | TF–physiology | 3 | 0.5 |
| NFYA—eWAT weight (g) | TF–physiology | 8 | 0.5 |
| PDE—energy intake (KJ/D)(whole intervention period) | TF–physiology | 2 | 0.5 |
| RCOR1—energy intake (KJ/D)(first 3 days after diet switch) | TF–physiology | 1 | 0.5 |
| SMAD5—energy intake (KJ/D)(first 3 days after diet switch) | TF–physiology | 3 | 0.666666667 |
| SMAD5—eWAT weight (g) | TF–physiology | 4 | 0.5 |
| SOX10—energy intake (KJ/D)(whole intervention period) | TF–physiology | 4 | 0.53125 |
| SREBF2—eWAT weight (g) | TF–physiology | 17 | 0.5 |
| DEK—membrane_part | TF–processes | 2 | 0.625 |
| FXR—lipid_metabolic_process | TF–processes | 5 | 0.666666667 |
| HNRNPD—biopolymer_metabolic_process | TF–processes | 2 | 0.666666667 |
| KDM3A—extracellular_region | TF–processes | 4 | 0.5 |
| KDM3A—response_to_external_stimulus | TF–processes | 3 | 0.666666667 |
| KDM3A—signal_transduction | TF–processes | 4 | 0.6 |
| NCOA6—response_to_external_stimulus | TF–processes | 3 | 0.4 |