F Dai1, F Zhang1, D Sun1, Z H Zhang1, S W Dong2, J Z Xu1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, National and Regional United Engineering Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. 2. School of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Materials Science, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Abstract
Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (allo-MSCs) have recently garnered increasing interest for their broad clinical therapy applications. Despite this, many studies have shown that allo-MSCs are associated with a high rate of graft rejection unless immunosuppressive therapy is administered to control allo-immune responses. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) is a co-inhibitory molecule expressed on T cells that mediates the inhibition of T-cell function. Here, we investigated the osteogenic differentiation potency of allo-MSCs in an activated immune system that mimics the in vivo allo-MSC grafting microenvironment and explored the immunomodulatory role of the helper T cell receptor CTLA4 in this process. We found that MSC osteogenic differentiation was inhibited in the presence of the activated immune response and that overexpression of CTLA4 in allo-MSCs suppressed the immune response and promoted osteogenic differentiation. Our results support the application of CTLA4-overexpressing allo-MSCs in bone tissue engineering.
Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (allo-MSCs) have recently garnered increasing interest for their broad clinical therapy applications. Despite this, many studies have shown that allo-MSCs are associated with a high rate of graft rejection unless immunosuppressive therapy is administered to control allo-immune responses. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) is a co-inhibitory molecule expressed on T cells that mediates the inhibition of T-cell function. Here, we investigated the osteogenic differentiation potency of allo-MSCs in an activated immune system that mimics the in vivo allo-MSC grafting microenvironment and explored the immunomodulatory role of the helper T cell receptor CTLA4 in this process. We found that MSC osteogenic differentiation was inhibited in the presence of the activated immune response and that overexpression of CTLA4 in allo-MSCs suppressed the immune response and promoted osteogenic differentiation. Our results support the application of CTLA4-overexpressing allo-MSCs in bone tissue engineering.
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a type of pluripotent stem cell
that possesses the capacity for self-renewal and differentiation into multiple
functional cell types (1). Although evidence
indicates that MSCs have therapeutic potential in bone tissue engineering and tissue
repair and regeneration (2), differences in
patient age and the limited number of available autologous MSCs represent major
obstacles to their clinical application. Accordingly, due to their stability and ready
availability in large quantities, allogeneic MSCs (allo-MSCs) represent an attractive
alternative as a seed cell source for bone tissue engineering (2,3).The low immunogenicity of MSCs is attributable to their expression of major
histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and adhesion molecules including vascular cell
adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), intracellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), and lymphocyte
function-associated antigen 3 (LFA-3) and their lack of expression of MHC class II
molecules (e.g., CD40, CD80, and CD86) (4,5). Indeed, a number of studies have indicated that
MSCs are immunosuppressive both in vitro and in vivo
(6), exerting a profound inhibitory effect on
the proliferation of T cells, B cells, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells. In
addition, an array of soluble factors including transforming growth factor (TGF)-β,
prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), and inducible nitric oxide
synthase (iNOS) have been suggested to mediate the immunosuppressive effects of MSCs.
Consistent with their immunosuppressive properties, allo-MSCs have been shown to prolong
skin allograft survival in immunocompetent baboons and to prevent the rejection of
melanoma tumor cells in immunocompetent mice (7,8). Despite this, many studies have
shown that unless immunosuppressive therapy is administered to control the allo-immune
responses, allo-MSCs are associated with a high rate of graft rejection (9–13). For
example, in a study of rats with a femoral segmental defect, Tsuchida et al. (9) found that treatment with a short-term
immunosuppressant increased the survival time of grafted allo-MSCs and enhanced their
ability to repair critical bone defects to a degree comparable to that of autologous
MSCs. Moreover, increased rejection of allogeneic donor bone marrow (BM) cells following
infusion of donor MSCs in a murine model of allogeneic BM transplantation has been
attributed to induction of a memory T-cell response by allo-MSCs (10). In this context, it has been shown that tissue damage gives
rise to an inflammatory response involving immune cells and is associated with increased
fracture healing time and a higher rate of complications (14). Accordingly, we hypothesized that immune system activation may
directly affect allo-MSC differentiation potential.Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) is an important co-inhibitory
molecule expressed on activated T cells that mediates T-cell anergy, apoptosis, and
clone deletion and is associated with increased immune tolerance (15). The mechanism of action of CTLA4 involves competitive
inhibition of CD28 binding with B7 on antigen-presenting cells (APCs), thereby blocking
the B7-CD28 costimulatory pathway and inhibiting T-cell activation (15). A fusion protein comprising the extracellular
domain of CTLA4 and a modified CH2-CH3 domain of IgG (16) (CTLA4-Ig) has been shown to inhibit T-cell-dependent antibody responses;
prolong transplanted organ survival; and induce long-term donor-specific tolerance in
transplants of heart, kidney, bone, and skin (17–19). Moreover, we have shown that
human bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMMSCs) overexpressing CTLA4-Ig
differentiate normally into osteoblasts in vitro and form bone tissue
in xenotransplantation models in the absence of general immunosuppression (5). Accordingly, in the current study, we set out to
evaluate the osteogenic differentiation potency of allo-MSCs in an in
vitroimmune activation microenvironment and to characterize the mechanism
underlyingCTLA4 promotion of MSC osteogenic differentiation.
Material and Methods
Isolation, culture expansion, and flow cytometry analysis of MSCs
MSCs were isolated and cultured using a previously described method (5). Briefly, about 10 mL iliac crest marrow
aspirate was collected from healthy volunteers in a syringe containing 3000 U of
heparin. Written informed consent was obtained from all volunteers. The marrow sample
was diluted with 10 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and loaded onto 20 mL Ficoll
(TBD Corporation, China) with a density of 1.073 g/mL in a 50-mL conical tube. Cell
separation was accomplished by centrifugation at 900g for 20 min at
20°C. Nucleated cells were collected from the interface, diluted with 20 mL PBS, and
centrifuged at 900g for 10 min at 20°C. Cells were resuspended in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing F12 (Hyclone, USA) and 10% fetal
bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, USA). Cells were cultured at a density of
7.5×106 cells per 37.5 cm2 flask in F12-DMEM containing 10%
FBS at 37°C and 5% CO2. When subconfluent, cells were detached using 0.05%
trypsin-EDTA (Gibco) and subcultured at a density of 1.8×105 cells per
37.5-cm2 flask. After the third passage, cells were harvested for
detection of surface antigens by flow cytometry. Cells (5×105) were
incubated for 30 min with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled anti-CD105
monoclonal antibody (Sigma, USA) and phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled anti-CD34 monoclonal
antibody (Sigma). FITC-labeled anti-IgG2b monoclonal antibody (Sigma) and PE-labeled
anti-IgG1 monoclonal antibody (Sigma) were used as isotype controls. Cells were
washed with PBS and resuspended in PBS containing 1% formalin and 0.1% bovine serum
albumin (BSA, Sigma). Data were acquired on a FACSCalibur platform (BD Biosciences,
USA), and CD105-positive/CD34-negative populations were designated as BMMSCs.
Infection of MSCs with adenovirus containing theCTLA4-Ig
gene
Recombinant adenoviruses expressing genes encoding humanCTLA4-Ig
(pAdEasy-CTLA4-EGFP) and EGFP
(pAdEasy-EGFP) were gifts from Dr. Jun Wu (Third Military Medical
University, China). Viral solutions at a titer of 3×106 colony forming
units (CFUs)/mL were used to infect MSCs at 70% confluence. Green fluorescent protein
(GFP)-positive cells were detected by fluorescence microscopy, and
CTLA4 expression was characterized by flow cytometry and Western
blot (see respective sections).
Preparation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and establishment of an immune
activation microenvironment
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by Ficoll density gradient
centrifugation of heparinized peripheral blood collected from healthy human
volunteers. PBMCs were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 100
U/mL penicillin and 100 U/mL streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, and 10% FBS (Gibco). PBMCs
were stimulated with 2.5 μg/mL phytohemagglutinin (PHA, Sigma) for 72 h to establish
the immune activation microenvironment.
Detection of CD80 and CD86 expression in PBMCs
PBMCs (5×105) were stimulated with 2.5 μg/mL PHA for 24 h, after which
cells were harvested, washed, and stained for 30 min with FITC-labeled anti-CD80
monoclonal antibody (BD Biosciences) and PE-labeled anti-CD86 monoclonal antibody (BD
Biosciences). FITC-labeled anti-IgG2b monoclonal antibody (BD Biosciences) and
PE-labeled anti-IgG2a (BD Biosciences) were used as isotype controls, respectively.
Cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in PBS containing 1% formalin and 0.1%
BSA. Data were acquired on a FACSCalibur platform (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using
the FlowJo software (FlowJo, USA).
Cell proliferation and cytokine production
PBMCs (5×105) were cocultured with 1×105 or 5×104
γ-irradiated (30 Gy) MSCs orCTLA4-infected MSCs (MSCs-CTLA4) in a
U-bottom 96-well plate for 3 days in the presence or absence of 2.5 μg/mL PHA. Cell
proliferation was measured using a Cell Counting Kit-8 assay (Dojindo, Japan)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. Levels of interleukin (IL)-2 and
interferon (IFN)-γ in supernatants were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (R&D Systems,
USA).
Osteogenic differentiation of MSCs in vitro
In vitro osteogenic differentiation of MSCs was performed as
described previously (5). Briefly, PBMCs were
stimulated with 2.5 μg/mL PHA to establish the immune-activation microenvironment and
cocultured with MSCs or MSCs-CTLA4 at a ratio of 5:1 for 72 h in flat-bottom 96-well
plates. The culture medium was then replaced with osteogenic medium [F12-DMEM and 10%
FBS plus 100 nM dexamethasone (Sigma), 0.05 mM ascorbic acid-2-phosphate (Sigma), and
10 mM β-glycerophosphate (Sigma)], which was replaced every 3 days for 21 days.
Osteogenic differentiation was evaluated at day 9 by alkaline phosphatase (ALP)
staining using a Sigma FASTTM BCIP/NBT tablet, and at day 21 using Alizarin red S
staining. The image was analyzed using the Image-Pro-Plus 6.0 software (Media
Cybernetics, USA).
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Total RNA was extracted using an RNA Pure Separate Extraction kit (BioTeke, China)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was synthesized using First Strand
cDNA Synthesis Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Thermo Fisher
Scientific, USA). Real-time PCR was performed on an ABI7500 real-time PCR system
(Applied Biosystems, USA) using SYBR Premix EX Taq™ II (Takara, Japan). The primers
used were as follows:RUNX2 (125 bp): 5′-AGATGATGACACTGCCACCTCTG-3′
(F), 5′-GGGATGAAATGCTTGGGAACTGC-3′ (R); ALP(162 bp):
5′-ACCATTCCCACGTCTTCACATTTG-3′ (F), 5′-AGACATTCTCTCGTTCACCGCC-3′ (R);
Collagen 1 (147 bp): 5′-CCTGGAAAGAATGGAGATGATG-3′ (F),
5′-ATCCAAACCACTGAAACCTCTG-3′(R);GAPDH (159 bp):
5′-ACCCATCACCATCTTCCAGGAG-3′ (F), 5′-GAAGGGGCGGAGATGATGAC-3′(R). Relative expression
levels were calculated by normalizing to the expression of the housekeeping gene
glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).
Western blot
Total protein was extracted with radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer
(KeyGEN BioTECH, China) and separated by 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), then transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes
(Millipore, USA). After blocking nonspecific protein binding with 5% BSA, blots were
incubated with primary antibodies against CTLA4 (1:1000, R&D Systems, USA),
Collagen 1 (1:1000, Abcam, UK), Runx2 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and
GAPDH (1:12000, Sanjian, China). After extensive washing with PBS containing 0.1%
Triton X-100, membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated
secondary antibody (1:5000, Zhongshan, China) for 30 min at room temperature. The
signals were visualized by ChemiDoc XRS (Bio-Rad, USA) using an Enhanced
Chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Biosciences, UK) and analyzed using the ImageJ2x
software (USA).
Data analysis
Results are reported as means±SD. The statistical significance of differences between
groups was analyzed using two-tailed independent Student's t-tests.
Analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism 5.0 statistical software package
(GraphPad Software Inc., USA). P<0.05 was considered to be statistically
significant.
Results
CTLA4 expression in MSCs-CTLA4
Fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis demonstrated expression of CD105
and a lack of expression of CD34 in third-passage MSCs, indicating their successful
expansion (data not shown). Expression ofCTLA4-Ig in MSCs was
determined by flow cytometry (Figure 1A) and
fluorescence microscopy (Figure 1B), which
showed that approximately 69% of MSCs-CTLA4 were GFP positive, and 95% of MSCs-CTLA4
exhibited strong fluorescence in both regular and osteogenic media. Western blotting
confirmed elevated levels of CTLA4-Ig protein in MSCs-CTLA4 (Figure 1C).
Figure 1
Expression of CTLA4-Ig in mesenchymal stem cells
(MSCs)-CTLA4. A, Flow cytometry analysis of green fluorescent
protein (GFP) expression level in MSCs-CTLA4 population shows that the
percentage of GFP-positive cells was 68.98%. B, Strong
fluorescent signal in MSCs-CTLA4 as determined by fluorescence microscopy
(magnification 100×).C, Western blot shows elevated expression
of CTLA4-Ig protein in MSCs-CTLA4.
Effect of MSCs-CTLA4 on T lymphocyte proliferation and activation
Next, to investigate the effect of allo-MSCs on T lymphocyte proliferation,
γ-irradiated MSCs-CTLA4 or MSCs were cocultured with PBMCs at a ratio of 1:5 or 1:10
in the presence or absence of 2.5 μg/mL PHA. We found that lymphocyte proliferation
was inhibited by allo-MSCs-CTLA4 at both ratios in the presence or absence of PHA,
but not by allo-MSCs (Figure 2A-C), confirming
the inhibitory effect of CTLA4 on T lymphocyte proliferationin
vitro.
Figure 2
Proliferation and activation of T lymphocytes in the presence of
mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and MSCs-CTLA4. γ-irradiated MSCs-CTLA4 or MSCs
were cocultured with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at a ratio of
1:5 (A) or 1:10 (B) in the presence or
absence of 2.5 μg/mL phytohemagglutinin (PHA). Cell proliferation was measured
by CCK-8 assay. Data are reported as the absorbance values of each
group.C, Representative light microscope image
(magnification 100×). D and E, Levels of
interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon (IFN)-γ in supernatants. Data are reported as
means±SD. *P<0.05 (Student's t-test).
Consistent with this, levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ in the supernatant of MSCs-CTLA4 were
significantly lower than in the supernatants of MSCs and PHA-positive control cells
(Figure 2Dand E).
Osteogenic differentiation potency of MSCs-CTLA4 in an immune activation state
in vitro
Next, we evaluated the effect of CTLA4 expression on MSC osteogenic
differentiation in an immune activation state. MSCs-CTLA4 and MSCs exhibited
comparable rates of osteogenic differentiation when cultured in osteogenic medium
alone. However, when cells were cocultured with PHA-stimulated PBMCs in osteogenic
medium, expression of Runx2, Collagen 1, and ALP were significantly lower at both the
protein (Figure 3A and B) and mRNA (Figure 3C) levels in MSCs than in MSCs-CTLA4.
Consistent with this, ALP and Alizarin red S staining indicated that both ALP
activity and the number of mineralized nodules were significantly lower in MSCs than
in MSCs-CTLA4 (Figure 4A-C) cultured under the
same conditions. Collectively, these results indicate that MSC osteogenic
differentiation is impaired in an activated immune microenvironment and that this
inhibition is relieved by CTLA4expression.
Figure 3
Protein levels and mRNA expression of Runx2, collagen 1 and alkaline
phosphatase (ALP). Activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were
co-cultured with mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) or MSC-CTLA4 at a ratio of 5:1
for 2 h in flat-bottom 96-well plates, after which culture medium was replaced
with osteogenic medium and incubated for 21 days.A
andB, Protein levels of Runx2 and collagen 1 after 9 days
of culture in osteogenic medium. C, mRNA expression levels of
Runx2, collagen 1 and ALP after 9 days of osteo-induced cultivation. Data are
reported as means±SD. *P<0.05 (Student's t-test).
Figure 4
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and number of calcium nodules after
21-days culture in osteogenic medium. A, Images of ALP and
Alizarin red S staining. B, ALP activity. C,
Number of mineralized nodules determined quantitatively by Alizarin red S
staining. MSC: mesenchymal stem cells; PHA: phytohemagglutinin; PBMC:
peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Data are reported as means±SD. *P<0.05
(Student'st-test).
Discussion
The current study set out to evaluate functional interactions between allo-MSCs and
activated immune cells to better understand the mechanisms of immune-mediated rejection
of MSC grafts. To accurately mimic host immune system activation during allo-MSCs
grafting, we used PHA, a T-cell activation mitogen, to stimulate the proliferation of
PBMC-derived T lymphocytesin vitro. We demonstrated, for the first
time, that osteogenic differentiation of allo-MSCs was inhibited in this
immune-activated state and that overexpression of the helper T cell receptor
CTLA4 in these cells restored their osteogenic differentiation
potential in this environment.Previous studies have demonstrated inhibition of T-cell proliferation by MSCs in
mixed-lymphocyte culture or during incubation with mitogens (20–22), indicating that in
addition to low immunogenicity, allo-MSCs also possess immunosuppressive properties.
Under certain circumstances however, immunosuppression may have negative or undesirable
effects such as inhibition of graft implantation. For example, Poncelet et al. (11) reported that, although MSCs had no
immunogenicity in vitro, they could activate the host immune system
in vivo. Moreover, infusion of donor MSCs has been shown to induce a
memory T-cell response that significantly increased rejection of allogeneic donor BM
cells (10). Furthermore, promotion by allo-MSCs
implants of host-derived lymphoid CD8+T, natural killer T (NKT), and NK cells
has been shown to result in immune rejection (12), suggesting that MSCs are not intrinsically immunoprivileged and are
unsuitable as universal donors in immunocompetent MHC-mismatched recipients.We found that levels of the osteogenic markers Runx2, Collagen 1, and ALP, ALP activity,
and the number of mineralized nodules were all significantly reduced in allo-MSCs
cocultured with PHA-stimulated PBMCs in osteogenic medium compared to allo-MSCs cultured
alone (Figures 3 and 4). These results are consistent with previous reports suggesting
that allo-MSC osteogenic differentiation is compromised in an activated immune
microenvironment. Our data further strengthened the hypothesis that activation of the
host immune system during implantation of allo-MSCs might result in limited new bone
formation.Processes invoked to explain immune system activation during grafting include tissue
damage-induced inflammation and recognition of implanted scaffold materials as antigens
by APCs (23–25). In addition, MSC differentiation into a variety of cell types after
implantation has been shown to be accompanied by increased expression of MHC-class II
molecules, enhancing their antigenicity and immunogenicity (26). Based on these observations, we hypothesized that activation of
the immune system might directly affect the allo-MSC differentiation potential and that
immune rejection destroys these seed cells prior to their differentiation into
osteoblasts. Accordingly, to promote the acceptance of grafted allo-MSCs, we converted
these cells to tolerance-inducing cells by overexpressing the helper T cell
receptorCTLA4. The CTLA4-Ig fusion protein was previously shown to
block the CD80/CD86-CD28 costimulatory pathway to induce antigen-specific immune
suppression and to promote osteogenic differentiation of MSCs in xenotransplantation
models in the absence of general immunosuppression. Consistent with these reports,
CTLA4 overexpression in allo-MSCs enhanced their inhibition of
lymphocyte proliferation and IL-2 and IFN-γ production (Figure 2) and increased lymphocyte expression of CD80 and CD86 (Supplementary
Figure S1). CTLA4 also induced the expression of IDO, which acts in
trans to suppress activation of conventional T cells (27), confirming thatCTLA4 exerts its inhibitory
effect on T lymphocytes functionin vitro by competitively binding with
CD28 and blocking the B7-CD28 costimulatory pathway. The other possible molecular
mechanism is thatCTLA4 inhibits T cell receptor (TCR) signal
transduction by binding to TCRζ and inhibiting tyrosine phosphorylation after T cell
activation (28). CTLA4 has been
shown to suppress T cell activation and function via recruitment of the phosphatases SH2
domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase 1 (SHP1), SHP2, and serine/threonine protein
phosphatase 2A (PP2A). These phosphatases dephosphorylate several of the major signaling
nodes such as nuclear factor of activated T cells (NF-AT), NF-κB, mammalian target of
rapamycin (mTOR) and activator protein 1 (AP-1), which are essential for costimulation
of T cells (29). Furthermore,
CTLA4 overexpression enhanced the osteogenic differentiation
capacity of allo-MSCs in osteogenic medium in the activated immune state, but not under
normal osteogenic conditions (Figures 3 and 4).Our study has a number of limitations. The intricate nature of bone reconstruction
involves the interactions of variety of cells in vivo, which
complicates the development of a suitable bone remodeling and immune microenvironment
ex vivo (30,31). Indeed, although grafted allo-MSCs have been shown
to be capable of prolonged survival, they fail to successfully differentiate into bone
tissue in vivo (9).
Consequently, althoughCTLA4 promoted the osteogenic differentiation of
MSCsin vitro, whether it has similar effects in
vivo will require further study. Secondly, although adenoviruses achieve
more efficient gene transfer than retroviruses and do not integrate the target gene into
the host cell genome, their potential tumorigenicity restricts their clinical
applications (32). Consequently, additional
studies will be required to verify the safety ofCTLA4 overexpression in
allo-MSCs in vivo.In conclusion, our results demonstrated that the osteogenic differentiation of allo-MSCs
is compromised in an activated immune environment and that expression in these cells of
CTLA4 reversed this inhibition. Our study holds promise for the
future success of allo-MSC engraftment in bone engineering and holds out the possibility
that CTLA4-expressing MSCs can give rise to bone tissue in
vivo, even in the setting of immune-mediated rejection.
Authors: Na Wei; Jun Kai Fan; Jin Fa Gu; Ling Feng He; Wen Hao Tang; Xin Cao; Xin Yuan Liu Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: K M Lee; E Chuang; M Griffin; R Khattri; D K Hong; W Zhang; D Straus; L E Samelson; C B Thompson; J A Bluestone Journal: Science Date: 1998-12-18 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Alma J Nauta; Geert Westerhuis; Alwine B Kruisselbrink; Ellie G A Lurvink; Roel Willemze; Willem E Fibbe Journal: Blood Date: 2006-05-11 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: T Watanabe; T Miyatake; H Kumamoto; N Mafune; S Kubota; H Okamoto; T Murashita; T Uede; K Yasuda Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Vicky Nicolaidou; Mei Mei Wong; Andia N Redpath; Adel Ersek; Dilair F Baban; Lynn M Williams; Andrew P Cope; Nicole J Horwood Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bernardo Zoehler; Letícia Fracaro; Lidiane Maria Boldrini-Leite; José Samuel da Silva; Paul J Travers; Paulo Roberto Slud Brofman; Maria da Graça Bicalho; Alexandra Cristina Senegaglia Journal: Cells Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 7.666