David P Thomas1, Kathryn S Panaretto2, Matthew Stevens3, Pele T Bennet4, Ron Borland5. 1. Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia. david.thomas@menzies.edu.au. 2. University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia. 3. Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia. 4. Queensland Aboriginal and Islander Health Council, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 5. Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's protection from second-hand smoke at home and work. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The Talking About The Smokes project surveyed 2522 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people from communities served by 34 Aboriginal community-controlled health services and one community in the Torres Strait, using quota sampling, from April 2012 to October 2013. We made comparisons with data from Australian smokers in the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project (ITC Project), collected from either July 2010 to May 2011 or September 2011 to February 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether smoking was not allowed anywhere in the home, or not allowed in any indoor area at work. RESULTS: More than half (56%) of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander smokers and 80% of non-smokers reported that smoking was never allowed anywhere in their home. Similar percentages of daily smokers in our sample and the Australian ITC Project data reported bans. Most employed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander daily smokers (88%) reported that smoking was not allowed in any indoor area at work, similar to the Australian ITC Project estimate. Smokers working in smoke-free workplaces were more likely to have smoke-free homes than those in workplaces where smoking was allowed indoors (odds ratio, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.67-4.87). Smokers who lived in smoke-free homes were more likely to have made a quit attempt in the past year, to want to quit, and to have made quit attempts of 1 month or longer. CONCLUSION: Most Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are protected from second-hand smoke at work, and similar proportions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander smokers and other Australian smokers do not allow smoking inside their homes.
OBJECTIVE: To examine Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's protection from second-hand smoke at home and work. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The Talking About The Smokes project surveyed 2522 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people from communities served by 34 Aboriginal community-controlled health services and one community in the Torres Strait, using quota sampling, from April 2012 to October 2013. We made comparisons with data from Australian smokers in the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project (ITC Project), collected from either July 2010 to May 2011 or September 2011 to February 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether smoking was not allowed anywhere in the home, or not allowed in any indoor area at work. RESULTS: More than half (56%) of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander smokers and 80% of non-smokers reported that smoking was never allowed anywhere in their home. Similar percentages of daily smokers in our sample and the Australian ITC Project data reported bans. Most employed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander daily smokers (88%) reported that smoking was not allowed in any indoor area at work, similar to the Australian ITC Project estimate. Smokers working in smoke-free workplaces were more likely to have smoke-free homes than those in workplaces where smoking was allowed indoors (odds ratio, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.67-4.87). Smokers who lived in smoke-free homes were more likely to have made a quit attempt in the past year, to want to quit, and to have made quit attempts of 1 month or longer. CONCLUSION: Most Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are protected from second-hand smoke at work, and similar proportions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander smokers and other Australian smokers do not allow smoking inside their homes.
Authors: Alan R Clough; Kristy Grant; Jan Robertson; Matthew Wrigley; Nina Nichols; Tracey Fitzgibbon Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 2.692