Conrad Rockel1,2, Michael D Noseworthy1,2,3,4. 1. McMaster School of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 2. Imaging Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the effect of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) acquisition parameters on principal and minor eigenvector stability within human lower leg skeletal muscles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lower leg muscles were evaluated in seven healthy subjects at 3T using an 8-channel transmit/receive coil. Diffusion-encoding was performed with nine signal averages (NSA) using 6, 15, and 25 directions (NDD). Individual DTI volumes were combined into aggregate volumes of 3, 2, and 1 NSA according to number of directions. Tensor eigenvalues (λ1 , λ2 , λ3 ), eigenvectors (ε1 , ε2 , ε3 ), and DTI metrics (fractional anisotropy [FA] and mean diffusivity [MD]) were calculated for each combination of NSA and NDD. Spatial maps of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), λ3 :λ2 ratio, and zenith angle were also calculated for region of interest (ROI) analysis of vector orientation consistency. RESULTS: ε1 variability was only moderately related to ε2 variability (r = 0.4045). Variation of ε1 was affected by NDD, not NSA (P < 0.0002), while variation of ε2 was affected by NSA, not NDD (P < 0.0003). In terms of tensor shape, vector variability was weakly related to FA (ε1 :r = -0.1854, ε2 : ns), but had a stronger relation to the λ3 :λ2 ratio (ε1 :r = -0.5221, ε2 :r = -0.1771). Vector variability was also weakly related to SNR (ε1 :r = -0.2873, ε2 :r = -0.3483). Zenith angle was found to be strongly associated with variability of ε1 (r = 0.8048) but only weakly with that of ε2 (r = 0.2135). CONCLUSION: The second eigenvector (ε2 ) displayed higher directional variability relative to ε1 , and was only marginally affected by experimental conditions that impacted ε1 variability.
PURPOSE: To explore the effect of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) acquisition parameters on principal and minor eigenvector stability within human lower leg skeletal muscles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lower leg muscles were evaluated in seven healthy subjects at 3T using an 8-channel transmit/receive coil. Diffusion-encoding was performed with nine signal averages (NSA) using 6, 15, and 25 directions (NDD). Individual DTI volumes were combined into aggregate volumes of 3, 2, and 1 NSA according to number of directions. Tensor eigenvalues (λ1 , λ2 , λ3 ), eigenvectors (ε1 , ε2 , ε3 ), and DTI metrics (fractional anisotropy [FA] and mean diffusivity [MD]) were calculated for each combination of NSA and NDD. Spatial maps of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), λ3 :λ2 ratio, and zenith angle were also calculated for region of interest (ROI) analysis of vector orientation consistency. RESULTS: ε1 variability was only moderately related to ε2 variability (r = 0.4045). Variation of ε1 was affected by NDD, not NSA (P < 0.0002), while variation of ε2 was affected by NSA, not NDD (P < 0.0003). In terms of tensor shape, vector variability was weakly related to FA (ε1 :r = -0.1854, ε2 : ns), but had a stronger relation to the λ3 :λ2 ratio (ε1 :r = -0.5221, ε2 :r = -0.1771). Vector variability was also weakly related to SNR (ε1 :r = -0.2873, ε2 :r = -0.3483). Zenith angle was found to be strongly associated with variability of ε1 (r = 0.8048) but only weakly with that of ε2 (r = 0.2135). CONCLUSION: The second eigenvector (ε2 ) displayed higher directional variability relative to ε1 , and was only marginally affected by experimental conditions that impacted ε1 variability.
Authors: Nadya Shusharina; Xiaofeng Liu; Jaume Coll-Font; Anna Foster; Georges El Fakhri; Jonghye Woo; Thomas Bortfeld; Christopher Nguyen Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2022-07-22 Impact factor: 4.174
Authors: Bruce M Damon; Martijn Froeling; Amanda K W Buck; Jos Oudeman; Zhaohua Ding; Aart J Nederveen; Emily C Bush; Gustav J Strijkers Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Melissa T Hooijmans; Martijn Froeling; Zaida Koeks; Jan J G M Verschuuren; Andrew Webb; Erik H Niks; Hermien E Kan Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 4.044