| Literature DB >> 26016434 |
Shuyu Zhang1, Zhengzhong Kuang2, Xiakun Zhang3.
Abstract
This study analyzes the mechanism of influence of heat waves with strong sudden cooling on cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in ApoE-/- mice. The process of heat waves with strong sudden cooling was simulated with a TEM1880 meteorological-environment simulation chamber according to the data obtained at 5 a.m. of 19 June 2006 to 11 p.m. of 22 June 2006. Forty-eight ApoE-/- mice were divided into six blocks based on their weight. Two mice from each block were randomly assigned to control, heat wave, temperature drop, and rewarming temperature groups. The experimental groups were transferred into the climate simulator chamber for exposure to the simulated heat wave process with strong sudden temperature drop. After 55, 59, and 75 h of exposure, the experimental groups were successively removed from the chamber to monitor physiological indicators. Blood samples were collected by decollation, and the hearts were harvested in all groups. The levels of heat stress factors (HSP60, SOD, TNF, sICAM-1, HIF-1α), cold stress factors (NE, EPI), vasoconstrictor factors (ANGII, ET-1, NO), and four items of blood lipid (TC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C) were measured in each ApoE-/- mouse. Results showed that the heat waves increased the levels of heat stress factors except SOD decreased, and decreased the levels of vasoconstrictor factors and blood lipid factors except TC increased. The strong sudden temperature drop in the heat wave process increased the levels of cold stress factors, vasoconstrictor factors and four blood lipid items (except the level of HDL-C which decreased) and decreased the levels of heat stress factors (except the level of SOD which increased). The analysis showed that heat waves could enhance atherosclerosis of ApoE-/- mice. The strong sudden temperature drop during the heat wave process increased the plasma concentrations of NE and ANGII, which indicates SNS activation, and resulted in increased blood pressure. NE and ANGII are vasoconstrictors involved in systemic vasoconstriction especially in the superficial areas of the body and conducive to increased blood pressure. The increase in the blood lipid levels of TG, LDL-C, TC, and LDL-C/HDL-C further aggravated CVD. This paper explored the influence mechanism of the heat waves with sudden cooling on CVD in ApoE-/- mice.Entities:
Keywords: ApoE−/− mice; atherosclerosis; cold stress factor; heat stress factor; heat wave; hypertensive; mechanism; strong cooling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26016434 PMCID: PMC4483669 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120605743
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Experiment temperature curve (arrows represent sampling time points).
Comparison of rectal temperature, body weight, heart rate, and blood pressure of ApoE−/− mice (mean ± sd., n = 12).
| Group | Control Group | Heat Wave Group | Temperature Drop Group | Rewarming Temperature Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rectal Temperature (°C) | 37.98 ± 0.25 | 38.04 ± 0.25 | 36.98 ± 0.21 | 38.09 ± 0.32 |
| Body Weight (g) | 28.03 ± 2.48 | 28.00 ± 1.88 | 27.88 ± 1.33 | 29.83 ± 1.73 |
| Heart rate (beat/min) | 617 ± 40.67 | 575 ± 51.27 | 471 ± 34 | 496 ± 47 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 119 ± 1 | 118 ± 2.3 | 122 ± 0.67 | 117.7 ± 1.44 |
Compared with the control group, * p < 0.05; Compared with the heat wave group, # p < 0.05; Compared with the temperature drop group, ** p < 0.05.
Comparison of HSP60, SOD, TNF, sICAM-1, and HIF-α (mean ± sd., n = 6).
| Index | Control Group | Heat Wave Group | Temperature Drop Group | Rewarming Temperature Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSP60 (ng/ml) | 6.45 ± 0.47 | 7.88 ± 0.29 | 4.60 ± 0.39 | 6.26 ± 0.84 # |
| SOD (U/mgprot) | 420.19 ± 10.28 | 382.45 ± 7.27 | 412.84 ± 17.87 # | 408.43 ± 56.33 # |
| TNF (pg/ml) | 6.79 ± 0.67 | 7.98 ± 0.69 | 7.08 ± 0.83 | 7.26 ± 0.93 |
| sICAM-1 (ng/L) | 65.66 ± 2.16 | 84.09 ± 8.41 | 71.85 ± 3.64 | 72.89 ± 5.39 |
| HIF-1α (pg/L) | 745.22 ± 104.83 | 819.56 ± 83.59 | 652.47 ± 130.05 | 713.33 ± 97.86 # |
Compared with the control group, * p < 0.05; Compared with the heat wave group, # p < 0.05.
Figure 2Variations of ET-1 (a), NO (b), and NO/ET-1 (c) in mice. Compared with the control group, * p < 0.01; Compared with the heat wave group, # p < 0.01; Compared with the temperature drop group, △ p < 0.01.
Figure 3Analysis of NE in ApoE−/− mice. Compared with the control group, * p < 0.01; Compared with the heat wave group, # p < 0.01; Compared with the temperature drop group, △ p < 0.01.
Figure 4Analysis of EPI in ApoE−/− mice. Compared with the control group, * p < 0.01; Compared with the heat wave group, # p < 0.01; Compared with the temperature drop group, △ p < 0.01.
Figure 5Analysis of ANG II in ApoE−/− mice.
Comparison of HDL-C, LDL-C, TC, and TG levels in ApoE−/− mice.
| Index | Control Group | Heat Wave Group | Temperature Drop Group | Rewarming Temperature Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.66344 ± 0.27 | 0.64618 ± 0.03 | 0.61865 ± 0.02 | 0.70578 ± 0.49 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.66200 ± 0.09 | 1.54135 ± 0.16 | 1.68585 ± 0.16 # | 1.49493 ± 0.16 |
| Tc (mmol/L) | 2.25762 ± 0.05 | 2.20990 ± 0.22 | 2.34685 ± 0.11 | 2.04389 ± 0.93 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.7155 ± 0.15 #, | 2.83420 ± 0.71 | 3.09825 ± 0.93 | 2.90980 ± 0.92 |
| LDL-C/HDL-C | 2.505 | 2.402 | 2.725 # | 2.118 |
Compared with the control group, * p < 0.05; Compared with the heat wave group, # p < 0.05; Compared with the temperature drop group, ** p < 0.05.