| Literature DB >> 26015780 |
Agnieszka Brzozowska1, Paweł Majak1, Joanna Jerzyńska1, Katarzyna Smejda1, Monika Bobrowska-Korzeniowska1, Włodzimierz Stelmach2, Magdalena Koczkowska3, Iwona Stelmach1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is evidence that parameters obtained from exhaled breath condensate (EBC) reflect changes in the level of the airway lining fluid. The telation between exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and EBC inflammatory markers has not been analyzed in the context of the inflammatory profile in the airways in asthmatic children. AIM: To show the cytokine profile in EBC of children with severe/refractory asthma as well as correlations between the fractional exhaled NO (FeNO) level and cytokine concentrations.Entities:
Keywords: children; cytokines; exhaled breath condensate; nitric oxide; refractory asthma
Year: 2015 PMID: 26015780 PMCID: PMC4436230 DOI: 10.5114/pdia.2014.40953
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Postepy Dermatol Alergol ISSN: 1642-395X Impact factor: 1.837
Characteristics of study patients
| Parameter | Patients | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
| Age [years] | 17 | 8 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 16 | 17 | 17 |
| Gender | Male | Male | Female | Female | Male | Female | Female | Male |
| Asthma duration [years] | 6 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 2 |
| FEV1 [% pred.] | 84.8 | 88 | 82.4 | 73.6 | 95.2 | 76 | 72 | 100.8 |
| FeNO [ppb] | 8.9 | 30.8 | 31.6 | 108 | 15.6 | 251 | 71.2 | 23.7 |
| Allergy profile | Seasonal/perennial | Seasonal | Seasonal | Seasonal/perennial | Seasonal | Seasonal/perennial | Seasonal/perennial | Seasonal/perennial |
| Cat allergy | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Current allergy exposure | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Asthma exacerbation | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
Number of asthma exacerbations requiring hospitalization during last 12 months.
Descriptive statistics and partial correlations between study variables
| Variables | Mean [pg/ml] | SD [pg/ml] | Range [pg/ml] | Lower detection limit [pg/ml] | Coefficient of variation (SD/mean × 100%) | Correlations with FeNO [ppb] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFN-γ | 10.9 | 1.6 | 4.6 | 8.9 | 14.9 | 0.508 |
| IL-1a | 19.5 | 10.6 | 32 | 14.5 | 54.6 | 0.176 |
| IL-1ra | 125.6 | 39.4 | 128.1 | 67.4 | 31.3 | 0.155 |
| IL-2 | 41 | 7.4 | 22.9 | 19.9 | 18 | 0.777 |
| IL-5 | 28.9 | 8.9 | 26.7 | 22.0 | 30.6 | 0.032 |
| IL-6 | 16.4 | 4 | 12.1 | 9.6 | 24.3 | 0.631 |
| IL-7 | 24.3 | 2.9 | 8.4 | 16.9 | 12.1 | 0.054 |
| IL-8 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 21.3 | 0.583 |
| IL-12p70 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 20.1 | 0.231 |
| IL-13 | 11.8 | 3.1 | 8.6 | 7.5 | 26.5 | –0.478 |
| IL-15 | 65.4 | 12.3 | 35.6 | 24.1 | 18.9 | 0.485 |
| IL-16 | 33.7 | 4.3 | 14 | 24.4 | 12.7 | –0.084 |
| IL-17 | 135 | 53.9 | 165.8 | 115.0 | 39.9 | 0.118 |
| MCP-1 | 81.5 | 23.6 | 69.9 | 29.1 | 28.9 | 0.752 |
| MIG | 188.1 | 36.1 | 91.4 | 84.0 | 19.2 | 0.06 |
| MIP-1a | 40.8 | 18.3 | 48.8 | 16.5 | 44.8 | 0.582 |
| MIP-1b | 2.9 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 25.7 | 0.475 |
| PDGFBB | 6.8 | 3.3 | 9.5 | 6.3 | 47.8 | 0.942 |
| TIMP-2 | 302.1 | 150.7 | 410.7 | 212.9 | 49.9 | 0.734 |
| TNF-α | 34.4 | 3 | 9.5 | 13.5 | 8.6 | 0.176 |
All correlations between two different variables were controlled for the effects of age, FEV1 and number of asthma exacerbations. Data presented as a correlation coefficient.
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Figure 1Correlations between cytokines (IL-2, MCP-1, PDGF-BB, TIMP-2) concentration in the airways and the fractional exhaled nitric oxide FeNO level
Partial correlations between cytokines
| IFN-γ | IL-1a | IL-2 | IL-5 | IL-6 | IL-7 | IL-8 | IL-12p70 | IL-15 | IL-17 | MCP-1 | MIG | MIP1b | PDGFBB | TIMP2 | TNF-α | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.45 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.45 | 0.79 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.55 | 0.29 | 0.45 |
| 0.69 | 0.05 | –0.05 | –0.67 | |
|
| 0.45 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.19 | 0.48 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.38 | –0.31 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.14 | –0.21 |
| |
|
|
| 0.24 | 0.17 |
| 0.45 |
| –0.07 |
| 0.02 | 0.71 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.19 | 0.29 | –0.14 | |
|
| 0.76 | 0.31 | 0.17 | –0.17 | 0.71 | –0.31 | 0.50 | 0.07 | 0.52 | –0.02 |
| 0.64 | –0.14 | –0.36 |
| |
|
| 0.45 | 0.19 | 0.90 | –0.17 | 0.31 |
| –0.17 |
| –0.21 |
| 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 0.14 | |
|
|
| 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.71 | 0.31 | 0.19 | 0.52 | 0.69 | –0.05 | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.67 | –0.12 | 0.02 | –0.50 | |
|
| 0.33 | 0.14 | 0.83 | –0.31 |
| 0.19 | –0.24 |
| –0.31 |
| 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.36 | 0.57 | 0.24 | |
|
| 0.33 | 0.14 | –0.07 | 0.50 | –0.17 | 0.52 | –0.24 | 0.17 | 0.36 | 0.21 | 0.33 |
| 0.36 | 0.38 | –0.24 | |
|
| 0.55 | 0.38 | 0.76 | 0.07 |
| 0.69 |
| 0.17 | –0.40 |
| 0.17 | 0.33 | 0.05 | 0.38 | 0.00 | |
|
| 0.21 | –0.19 | –0.33 | 0.64 | –0.52 | 0.36 | –0.60 |
| –0.24 | 0.60 | –0.19 | 0.43 | 0.69 | 0.05 | 0.05 | –0.24 |
|
| 0.29 | –0.31 | 0.02 | 0.52 | –0.21 | –0.05 | –0.31 | 0.36 | –0.40 | –0.31 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.02 | –0.26 | |
|
| 0.45 | 0.24 | 0.71 | –0.02 |
| 0.60 |
| 0.21 |
| –0.31 | 0.26 | 0.38 | 0.33 | 0.67 | 0.14 | |
|
|
| 0.29 | 0.29 |
| 0.10 | 0.71 | 0.02 | 0.33 | 0.17 | 0.36 | 0.26 | 0.57 | 0.05 | –0.10 | –0.64 | |
|
| 0.69 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.64 | 0.12 | 0.67 | 0.05 |
| 0.33 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.57 | 0.38 | 0.36 | –0.43 | |
|
| 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.19 | –0.14 | 0.33 | –0.12 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.05 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.05 | 0.38 |
| 0.02 | |
|
| –0.05 | –0.21 | 0.29 | –0.36 | 0.52 | 0.02 | 0.57 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.02 | 0.67 | –0.10 | 0.36 |
| 0.52 | |
|
| –0.67 |
| –0.14 | –0.79 | 0.14 | –0.50 | 0.24 | –0.24 | 0.00 | –0.26 | 0.14 | –0.64 | –0.43 | 0.02 | 0.52 |
All correlations between two different variables were controlled for the effect of all other variables. Data presented as a correlation coefficient; significant correlations are bolded.