Literature DB >> 26015305

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Using Retrograde Intramedullary Nail Fixation: Comparison of Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus.

Dane K Wukich1, Brady R Mallory2, Natalie C Suder3, Bedda L Rosario4.   

Abstract

Retrograde intramedullary nailing for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis is a salvage procedure reserved for severe cases of deformity. The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of this technique in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). A total of 61 patients with and 56 without DM underwent retrograde intramedullary nailing and had a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The overall incidence of complication was 45.2%; however, the overall incidence of complications between those with and without DM was not significantly different (odds ratio [OR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38 to 1.65, p = .54). Patients with DM had a significantly greater rate of superficial infections (OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.01 to 68.67, p = .03). However, no difference was seen in the rate of deep infection (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.46, p = .83) or noninfectious complications (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.13, p = .09). Successful limb salvage was achieved for 96.8% of the patients with DM and 94.7% of those without DM (p = .66). A femoral head allograft was used in 32 (27.4%) of 117 patients to substitute for an osseous void. Of the 32 patients who required a femoral head allograft, 21 (67.7%) experienced a complication compared with 32 (37.6%) of 85 patients who did not require a femoral head allograft (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.35 to 7.41, p = .008). The incidence of patient satisfaction was 80% for patients with DM and 72% for those without DM (p = .36). Despite a high incidence of complications, limb salvage was accomplished in approximately 95% of patients with complicated deformities. Four patients (6.56%) with DM experienced a tibia fracture; therefore, we now routinely use a 300-mm-long nail for this reconstruction.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Charcot foot; complication; fusion; neuropathy; outcomes; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26015305      PMCID: PMC5664154          DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  40 in total

1.  Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail: a biomechanical analysis of the effect of nail length.

Authors:  Timothy Noonan; Michael Pinzur; Odysseas Paxinos; Robert Havey; Avinash Patwardhin
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  Biomechanical analysis of hindfoot fixation using an intramedullary rod.

Authors:  S S Fleming; T J Moore; W C Hutton
Journal:  J South Orthop Assoc       Date:  1998

3.  Retrograde Intramedullary Nail With Femoral Head Allograft for Large Deficit Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Bradly Bussewitz; J George DeVries; Michael Dujela; Jeffrey E McAlister; Christopher F Hyer; Gregory C Berlet
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Ankle arthrodesis with a retrograde femoral nail for Charcot ankle arthropathy.

Authors:  Michael S Pinzur; Timothy Noonan
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Comparison of radiographs and CT scans in the prospective evaluation of the fusion of hindfoot arthrodesis.

Authors:  Michael J Coughlin; Jerry S Grimes; Paul D Traughber; Carroll P Jones
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Midfoot and hindfoot arthrodeses in diabetic Charcot arthropathy.

Authors:  N C Stone; T R Daniels
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Retrograde intramedullary nailing for ankle arthrodesis.

Authors:  T J Moore; R Prince; D Pochatko; J W Smith; S Fleming
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.827

8.  Predictive risk assessment for major amputation after tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis.

Authors:  J George DeVries; Gregory C Berlet; Christopher F Hyer
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.827

9.  Union rate of tibiotalocalcaneal nails with internal or external bone stimulation.

Authors:  J George De Vries; Gregory C Berlet; Christopher F Hyer
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  A retrospective comparative analysis of Charcot ankle stabilization using an intramedullary rod with or without application of circular external fixator--utilization of the Retrograde Arthrodesis Intramedullary Nail database.

Authors:  J George DeVries; Gregory C Berlet; Christopher F Hyer
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 1.286

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Arthroscopic tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis].

Authors:  S F Baumbach; M Braunstein; F Maßen; M Regauer; W Mutschler; W Böcker; H Polzer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Total Ankle Arthroplasty or Ankle Arthrodesis for Treatment of Osteoarthritis in Patients With Diabetes.

Authors:  Arthur Tarricone; Allen Gee; Simon Chen; Karla De La Mata; Justin Muser; Wayne Axman; Prakash Krishnan; Vinayak Perake
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-07-26

3.  Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease as a Risk Factor for Periprosthetic Fractures in Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion With Intramedullary Nailing.

Authors:  Ashwin Bhadresha; Baljinder S Dhinsa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-15

Review 4.  The Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Bone Fracture Healing.

Authors:  Carlos Marin; Frank P Luyten; Bart Van der Schueren; Greet Kerckhofs; Katleen Vandamme
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.555

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.