Literature DB >> 26014885

Assessment of methods to recover DNA from bacteria, fungi and archaea in complex environmental samples.

Karina Guillén-Navarro1, David Herrera-López2, Mariana Y López-Chávez2, Máximo Cancino-Gómez2, Ana L Reyes-Reyes3.   

Abstract

DNA extraction from environmental samples is a critical step for metagenomic analysis to study microbial communities, including those considered uncultivable. Nevertheless, obtaining good quality DNA in sufficient quantities for downstream methodologies is not always possible, and it depends on the complexity and stability of each ecosystem, which could be more problematic for samples from tropical regions because those ecosystems are less stable and more complex. Three laboratory methods for the extraction of nucleic acids from samples representing unstable (decaying coffee pulp and mangrove sediments) and relatively stable (compost and soil) environments were tested. The results were compared with those obtained using two commercial DNA extraction kits. The quality of the extracted DNA was evaluated by PCR amplification to verify the recovery of bacterial, archaeal, and fungal genetic material. The laboratory method that gave the best results used a lysis procedure combining physical, chemical, and enzymatic steps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26014885     DOI: 10.1007/s12223-015-0403-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)        ISSN: 0015-5632            Impact factor:   2.099


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of the spatial homogeneity of physico-chemical parameters and bacterial 16S rRNA genes in sediment samples from a dumping site for dredging sludge.

Authors:  N Boon; C Marlé; E M Top; W Verstraete
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Comparative denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of fungal communities associated with whole plant corn silage.

Authors:  L A May; B Smiley; M G Schmidt
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Integrated lysis procedures reduce extraction biases of microbial DNA from mangrove sediment.

Authors:  Yun-Xia Jiang; Ji-Guo Wu; Ke-Qiang Yu; Chun-Xiang Ai; Fei Zou; Hong-Wei Zhou
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of genes encoding 16S rRNA and gel-electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients.

Authors:  H Heuer; M Krsek; P Baker; K Smalla; E M Wellington
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Archaea in coastal marine environments.

Authors:  E F DeLong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Diversity of fungi, bacteria, and actinomycetes on leaves decomposing in a stream.

Authors:  Mitali Das; Todd V Royer; Laura G Leff
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Bacterial diversity and distribution in the holocene sediments of a northern temperate lake.

Authors:  David M Nelson; Samuel Ohene-Adjei; Feng Sheng Hu; Isaac K O Cann; Roderick I Mackie
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  A nested PCR approach for improved recovery of archaeal 16S rRNA gene fragments from freshwater samples.

Authors:  Elisabeth W Vissers; Paul L E Bodelier; Gerard Muyzer; Hendrikus J Laanbroek
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  Sequence heterogeneities of genes encoding 16S rRNAs in Paenibacillus polymyxa detected by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  U Nübel; B Engelen; A Felske; J Snaidr; A Wieshuber; R I Amann; W Ludwig; H Backhaus
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Water quality and presence of pesticides in a tropical coastal wetland in southern Mexico.

Authors:  A Héctor Hernández-Romero; Cristian Tovilla-Hernández; Edi A Malo; Ricardo Bello-Mendoza
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.