Anja Rantanen1, Anneli Pitkänen2, Irmeli Paimensalo-Karell3,4, Marko Elovainio5, Pirjo Aalto2. 1. School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. 2. Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. 3. Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. 4. Medical Imaging Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. 5. National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
AIM: To examine the differences in work-related motivational and stress factors between two nursing allocation models (the primary nursing model and the individual patient allocation model). BACKGROUND: A number of nursing allocation models are applied in hospital settings, but little is known about the potential associations between various models and work-related psychosocial profiles in nurses. METHOD: A cross-sectional study using an electronic questionnaire. The data were collected from nurses (n = 643) working in 22 wards. In total, 317 questionnaires were returned (response rate 49.3%). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in motivational characteristics between the different models. The nurses working according to the individual patient allocation model were more satisfied with their supervisors. The work itself and turnover caused more stress to the nurses working in the primary nursing model, whereas patient-related stress was higher in the individual patient allocation model. CONCLUSION: No consistent evidence to support the use of either of these models over the other was found. Both these models have positive and negative features and more comparative research is required on various nursing practice models from different points of view. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nursing directors and ward managers should be aware of the positive and negative features of the various nursing models.
AIM: To examine the differences in work-related motivational and stress factors between two nursing allocation models (the primary nursing model and the individual patient allocation model). BACKGROUND: A number of nursing allocation models are applied in hospital settings, but little is known about the potential associations between various models and work-related psychosocial profiles in nurses. METHOD: A cross-sectional study using an electronic questionnaire. The data were collected from nurses (n = 643) working in 22 wards. In total, 317 questionnaires were returned (response rate 49.3%). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in motivational characteristics between the different models. The nurses working according to the individual patient allocation model were more satisfied with their supervisors. The work itself and turnover caused more stress to the nurses working in the primary nursing model, whereas patient-related stress was higher in the individual patient allocation model. CONCLUSION: No consistent evidence to support the use of either of these models over the other was found. Both these models have positive and negative features and more comparative research is required on various nursing practice models from different points of view. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nursing directors and ward managers should be aware of the positive and negative features of the various nursing models.
Authors: Pedro Parreira; Paulo Santos-Costa; Manoel Neri; António Marques; Paulo Queirós; Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-21 Impact factor: 3.390